69.4 F
New York

tjvnews.com

Thursday, April 24, 2025
CLASSIFIED ADS
LEGAL NOTICE
DONATE
SUBSCRIBE

Congress Must Break Up Meta for the Sake of Free Speech and Democracy

- Advertisement -

Related Articles

-Advertisement-

Must read

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

By David Ben Hooren

The ongoing antitrust trial between the Federal Trade Commission and Meta Platforms Inc. is more than a legal skirmish over corporate mergers—it is a moment of reckoning for American democracy. As The Wall Street Journal reported, this case has the potential to unravel Meta’s tightly controlled social media empire, force divestitures of Instagram and WhatsApp, and send a clear message that unchecked digital monopolies will no longer be tolerated. But if we are to confront the full weight of Meta’s power, Congress must act now—forcefully and decisively—to break up this corporate behemoth for reasons that go far beyond market dominance. At the heart of this battle lies a deeper, more insidious truth: Meta has become an engine of censorship, silencing voices that challenge its ideological orthodoxy. The cost is not just economic. It is constitutional.

Nowhere is this more glaring than in the case of The Jewish Voice (TJVNews.com), a legitimate, highly reputable news outlet that dares to maintain a conservative, pro-Israel, and pro-America stance. Without warning or explanation, Facebook permanently removed The Jewish Voice’s page—a digital lifeline to its readership—effectively erasing years of work, journalism, and community engagement. Despite The Jewish Voice sending numerous formal correspondences seeking an explanation or appeal, Meta offered nothing but silence. No rationale. No justification. No due process.

This is not content moderation. This is ideological purging.

Meta’s decision to eliminate The Jewish Voice from its platform is not an isolated incident; it is part of a broader pattern of suppressing viewpoints that do not align with its hyper-liberal worldview. What we are witnessing is a single individual—Mark Zuckerberg—assuming the role of an unelected, unaccountable arbiter of truth. Zuckerberg, a billionaire from Silicon Valley, a liberal Jew whose political biases are well documented, has created a system in which dissent from the progressive mainstream is treated as a threat to be neutralized rather than a viewpoint to be engaged.

Also bearing responsibility for the suppression of dissenting viewpoints at Meta are former Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg and current Instagram chief Adam Mosseri. Together with Mark Zuckerberg, the trio effectively operated as a unified leadership bloc, actively pursuing a coordinated strategy to marginalize voices they viewed as contrary to their progressive ideological objectives.

And let us be clear: The Jewish Voice’s only “crime” was daring to present a narrative that defended Israel unapologetically and called out anti-American and anti-Zionist sentiments that dominate elite discourse.

The removal of The Jewish Voice is not just an attack on a conservative newspaper. It is an assault on the First Amendment and the foundational principle of free expression. While Meta hides behind its status as a private company to justify its censorship, the reality is that Facebook has become the de facto public square. When that square is monopolized and curated by ideological gatekeepers, it ceases to be a space for democratic exchange. It becomes a filtered echo chamber engineered to exclude, suppress, and deplatform any voice deemed inconvenient.

According to The Wall Street Journal, Meta has long used its acquisition strategy not to foster innovation but to smother competition. Internal emails reveal that Zuckerberg viewed Instagram not as a complement to Facebook, but as a threat. “What we are really buying is time,” he wrote when acquiring the app. That’s not the language of a competitor; that’s the language of a monopolist terrified of disruption.

Meta’s defenders claim that consumers have “benefited” from the company’s acquisitions. But what good is slick functionality when the company behind it is eroding the most essential right of all—free speech? A platform that refuses to tolerate ideological diversity is not serving consumers. It is manipulating them.

The FTC’s case is vital, but Congress cannot afford to sit on the sidelines. Lawmakers must legislate where regulators alone may falter. A bipartisan coalition should be working right now to enact legislation that curtails Big Tech’s ability to amass and weaponize power. At a minimum, that means forcing Meta to spin off Instagram and WhatsApp, stripping it of the structural dominance it uses to censor voices such as The Jewish Voice. But this is just the beginning. Congress must also demand transparency in content moderation, protect political and religious speech, and hold tech executives personally accountable for unconstitutional censorship.

This is not about right or left. It is about right and wrong. When a single company controls the global conversation, dictates the boundaries of debate, and erases legitimate news outlets without explanation, that company has become a threat to democracy itself. Meta is no longer just a business. It is a regime.

The time to act is now. If we fail to break up Meta, we are handing the future of free speech—not just in America but across the world—to a handful of ideologically driven billionaires who believe their judgment supersedes the Constitution. We cannot afford that future. We must fight for one where all voices—liberal, conservative, Zionist, Christian, atheist, left or right—are allowed to be heard.

Break up Meta. For the sake of liberty, for the sake of democracy, and for the sake of every silenced voice still waiting for justice.

 

 

balance of natureDonate

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest article

- Advertisement -