43.1 F
New York

tjvnews.com

Saturday, March 22, 2025
CLASSIFIED ADS
LEGAL NOTICE
DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
Home Blog
ISA director Ronen Bar announced on Sunday that he has no intention of leaving his position despite the Prime Minister’s intentions to dismiss him. Credit: Chaim Goldberg/Flash90

 

“Bar will conclude his duties on April 10, 2025, or when a permanent director is appointed—whichever comes first,” according to a statement from the Prime Minister’s Office in Jerusalem.

The proposal cited Netanyahu’s “persistent personal and professional distrust” of Bar, deemed detrimental to both the government and the security service.

The development marked the first time that the government has fired the head of the country’s domestic security agency (akin to the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the United States).

In response, the Movement for Quality Government in Israel filed a High Court petition seeking to overturn Bar’s dismissal.

Hours later, the court issued a temporary injunction preventing Bar from being removed. The order will reportedly remain in place up to April 8, by which time the court can hear the petitions that have been filed against the government’s move.

On Thursday, Netanyahu reportedly slammed Bar’s “soft approach” and thus “not the right person to rehabilitate” the Shin Bet after the colossal intelligence failures leading up to Hamas’s Oct. 7, 2023, massacre.

In February, the prime minister removed Bar from the hostage negotiation team and replaced him with another senior Shin Bet official working under Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer.

Ahead of Thursday’s vote, the agency released a letter Bar had sent to the Cabinet ripping its “unfounded claims,” which he described as “nothing more than a cover for extraneous and fundamentally invalid motives designed to disrupt the ability of the Shin Bet to fulfill its role.”

Israel’s Supreme Court, sitting as the High Court of Justice, on Tuesday rejected a petition that sought to bar Netanyahu from bringing his proposal to a Cabinet vote.

In doing so, the justices also ruled against the position of Israeli Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara, who had sought to delay the vote until after a full analysis of the “factual and legal basis” for Bar’s dismissal, as well as of the prime minister’s “authority to address the matter at this time.”

Netanyahu told Baharav-Miara on Monday that she lacks the authority to prevent his government from firing Bar.

“Your attempt to override the government’s mandate is a dangerous denial of the government’s express authority,” Netanyahu wrote to the attorney general.

The premier announced earlier this week that he would be seeking the dismissal of Bar. “At all times, but especially in such an existential war, the prime minister must have full confidence in the head of the Shin Bet,” said Netanyahu in a statement on Sunday night.

“But unfortunately, the situation is exactly the opposite—I do not have such confidence. I have an ongoing lack of trust in the Shin Bet chief. A distrust that has only grown over time,” added the statement.

On Thursday, violence erupted at an anti-government protest in Jerusalem as left-wing activists mobilized nationwide ahead of the Cabinet vote on Bar’s dismissal.

Demonstrators attempted to breach a police barricade on Gaza Street near Netanyahu’s residence, leading to clashes with officers. Protesters also blocked traffic in the area.

Footage appeared to show a physical altercation between a police officer and Knesset member Yair Golan, leader of the left-wing The Democrats Party.

Bars’s five-year term would have ended on Oct. 14, 2026.

Yeshiva University Recognizes LGBTQ+ Student Club After Legal Battle

Yeshiva University’s history dates back 138 years, originating on the Lower East Side of Manhattan. Over the decades, the university has expanded to four campuses across Manhattan and the Bronx, evolving from its traditional roots into a dynamic institution that is now making significant inroads into the healthcare sector. Pictured above is YU’s Wilf Campus in the Washington Heights section of Manhattan. Credit: yu.edu

(AP) — Yeshiva University has agreed to officially recognize an LGBTQ+ student club following years of legal disputes, some of which reached the U.S. Supreme Court.

The university announced Thursday it had reached an agreement with the students to end the litigation, confirming the club, now called Hareni, will be recognized and “will operate in accordance with the approved guidelines of Yeshiva University’s senior rabbis.”

“The club will be run like other clubs on campus, all in the spirit of a collaborative and mutually supportive campus culture,” the university said.

The club was formerly known as the YU Pride Alliance, which had been at the center of the legal battle over whether the university’s religious beliefs exempted it from recognizing the group. In 2022, the case reached the Supreme Court, which allowed the club to be recognized but directed Yeshiva University to return to state court for further review.

In a separate statement Thursday, Hareni said it would enjoy the same privileges as other student organizations and plans to host events like movie nights, panel discussions, and career networking. The club will publicly use the term “LGBTQ+” on its flyers and advertisements.

 

“This agreement affirms that LGBTQ+ students at Yeshiva University are valued members of the community,” said Schneur Friedman, a president of the group.

 

“This victory is not just for our club — it’s for every student who deserves a safe space to be themselves,” added Hayley Goldberg, another president of Hareni.

Legendary Heavyweight Boxer George Foreman Dead at 76

(Breitbart) Heavyweight legend George Foreman died on Friday at the age of 76, his family announced.

His family said the lovable champion, whose career spanned decades, died surrounded by loved ones.

“Our hearts are broken,” the family wrote on Instagram. “With profound sorrow, we announce the passing of our beloved George Edward Foreman Sr., who peacefully departed on March 21, 2025, surrounded by loved ones.”

“A devout preacher, a devoted husband, a loving father, and a proud grand and great-grandfather, he lived a life marked by unwavering faith, humility, and purpose,” the family wrote.

“A humanitarian, an Olympian, and two-time heavyweight champion of the world, He was deeply respected — a force for good, a man of discipline, conviction, and a protector of his legacy, fighting tirelessly to preserve his good name — for his family.”

The family added that they “are grateful for the outpouring of love and prayers, and kindly ask for privacy as we honor the extraordinary life of a man we were blessed to call our own.”

His strong faith and ready smile made Foreman an instantly recognizable and memorable man. One of the few athletes who can be said to have accomplished more in his life after retiring from his sport through his intense devotion to faith, preaching, and all the initiatives that sprang from that, Foreman is a true champion inside and outside the ring.

Columbia U Concedes to Federal Demands Amid Campus Anti-Semitism Crisis, Sparking Fierce Debate Over Academic Independence

Columbia U Concedes to Federal Demands Amid Campus Anti-Semitism Crisis, Sparking Fierce Debate Over Academic Independence

By: Fern Sidman

In a move that has ignited both controversy and concern across academic and civil liberties circles, Columbia University has formally agreed to comply with a set of sweeping directives from the Trump administration as a prerequisite for reopening negotiations over $400 million in federal funding that was revoked due to the proliferation of anti-Semitic harassment on campus. The New York Daily News reported on Friday that the developments mark a dramatic escalation in the ongoing national debate over the balance between academic freedom and campus safety.

According to a letter obtained by The New York Daily News, Columbia’s interim president Katrina Armstrong confirmed that the university has consented to a series of federal demands in an effort to resolve the crisis.  All nine conditions required by President Trump, the Department of Education, and the Department of Justice have been addressed, Armstrong stated. Among the most consequential of these measures is an implementation of a protest mask ban to curb anonymity during demonstrations, a revised admissions and recruitment process, strict administrative oversight from a new senior vice provost who will monitor certain academic majors that, in the past, had provided anti-Semitic instruction.

The other conditions that were met include the empowerment of dozens of campus security personnel with arrest authority, and the installation of a high-level administrative overseer for the university’s Middle Eastern studies department.

Additionally, Armstrong announced that the campus judicial board for disciplining students will be made up of administrators and faculty members from now on, according to a report in The Epoch Times,  Also, the campus public safety staff is being increased to better handle disruptive situations, and the “intellectual diversity” in the faculty will be expanded, according to Armstrong.

These steps—unprecedented in scope for a private Ivy League institution—reflect the university’s attempts to stabilize its standing with federal agencies while addressing what the Trump administration described as “pervasive harassment of Jewish students” that warranted immediate intervention.

As The New York Daily News reported, Interim President Armstrong explained in her communication to faculty and students that Columbia’s compliance efforts are intended to preserve academic continuity and safeguard the welfare of the entire campus community. ‘At all times, we are guided by our values, putting academic freedom, free expression, open inquiry and respect for all at the fore of every decision we make,’ she wrote.

However, the measures have been met with growing backlash from within the Columbia community. Faculty members are particularly alarmed by what they see as an erosion of institutional autonomy—especially the federal directive to increase oversight of the Middle Eastern studies program (which has been funded by Qatar and other Muslim nations in the Middle East) in a move seen by liberal elites as politically motivated and academically invasive.

According to the information provided in The New York Daily News report, the Columbia chapter of the American Association of University Professors (AAUP) issued a scathing rebuke of the federal government’s March 13th memorandum, likening it to a “ransom letter.” The AAUP condemned the administration’s tactics as an unacceptable breach of academic governance, warning that such interference could set a dangerous precedent for future university-federal relations.

Despite Columbia’s concessions, there are no guarantees that federal funding will be reinstated. As The New York Daily News report emphasized, compliance is merely a “precondition for formal negotiations regarding Columbia University’s continued financial relationship with the United States government.” The Trump administration’s position highlights that only after demonstrable alignment with federal expectations will restoration of the funding even be considered.

Moreover, the administration’s memo also included a demand for “meaningful discipline” in response to last year’s campus protests, particularly the highly publicized occupation of Hamilton Hall by anti-Israel student activists who drew swastikas in the building.  On the same day the memo was circulated, Columbia swiftly moved to expel and suspend several students involved in the pro-Hamas protest, in what many view as an effort to signal its seriousness in addressing federal concerns.

This controversial disciplinary action, also reported by The New York Daily News, has drawn mixed reactions—some viewing it as a necessary step toward restoring order and campus safety, others as a troubling crackdown on student expression.

The university’s response could serve as a bellwether for how other institutions might navigate similar pressures under a federal administration willing to condition funding on ideological and administrative compliance.

For now, the future of Columbia’s federal funding—and the broader implications for higher education—remains uncertain.

Attorney General Announces Federal Charges for Tesla Dealership Attacks

U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi on March 20 warned people against carrying out attacks on Tesla dealerships or products, as she announced that three individuals who allegedly did so are facing federal charges.

“The days of committing crimes without consequence have ended,” Bondi said in a statement. “Let this be a warning: if you join this wave of domestic terrorism against Tesla properties, the Department of Justice will put you behind bars.”

Tesla CEO Elon Musk is a White House adviser who leads the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Daniel Clarke-Pounder, one of the alleged criminals, was charged with arson of property in interstate commerce after authorities said they identified him as the man who vandalized and set fire to a Tesla charging station in North Charleston, South Carolina, according to charging documents filed on March 14.

Clarke-Pounder used spray paint to write “[Expletive] Trump” and “Long Live Ukraine” before lighting beer bottles on fire and hurling them at the station, a Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives agent said.

Search warrants uncovered evidence linking Clarke-Pounder to the arson, including the sweatshirt the suspect was wearing in surveillance videos. Agents also found a notebook in Clarke-Pounder’s residence that outlined statements opposing DOGE.

Clarke-Pounder, who was released on March 17 while the case against him proceeds, has not yet entered a plea. His attorney did not respond to a request for comment.

In another incident, Adam Matthew Lansky was charged with illegal possession of a destructive device, according to a criminal complaint lodged on March 3 and later unsealed.

Lansky was identified as the person who threw Molotov cocktails at Tesla vehicles and a dealership in Salem, Oregon, on Jan. 20, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said in an affidavit. The attack caused an estimated $500,000 in damage.

Lansky returned to the dealership on Feb. 29 and allegedly fired gunshots into it, causing additional damage, according to the court filing. FBI analysis found Lansky’s fingerprints on items found at the scene.

During his initial court appearance, Lansky waived a preliminary hearing and the reading of the criminal complaint and was ordered detained as a danger. His arraignment is set for April 3.

Lansky’s attorney did not respond to an inquiry.

The third person charged is Justin Thomas Nelson, who currently goes by Lucy Grace Nelson.

Nelson was charged with malicious destruction of property after law enforcement identified him as the individual who spray painted “Nazi” on a sign at a Tesla dealership in Loveland, Colorado, on Feb. 2, according to an affidavit filed later in February.

Nelson was arrested at the same dealership on Feb. 24 and is also suspected of setting a fire near a Tesla Cybertruck there in January.

Nelson pleaded not guilty during a March 11 hearing and is set to go on trial in May.

Each of the three people faces at least five years, and up to 20 years, in prison if convicted.

Jews On the Precipice

Israel welcomed the publication of the ‘Handbook for the Practical Use of the IHRA Working Definition of Antisemitism’ by the European Commission as “a highly important document” that will help combat anti-Semitism on the Continent. Photo by Hillel Maeir/TPS on 22 January, 2020

Jews On the Precipice

By: Phyllis Chesler

I was once publicly mocked as the “Jewish Cassandra. I replied: “Sir, why do you say that? No one believed her, Troy was utterly destroyed, and she herself became Agamemnon’s sex-slave. Are you predicting that the Jewish people will not heed all the warnings that a good number of us are writing about? Are you a prophet of doom as well? Or are you one of the deniers among us?

And so, I’ve decided to republish some of my work from earlier in this century–on a regular basis. Perhaps my current readers never read any of this; perhaps historians might find such work useful. Fear not: I will also republish my work on film, opera, music, only some of which address “relevant” themes.

Do let me know what you think.

This article originally appeared in The Jewish Press on May 19, 2004

Some say that we are re-living the 1930’s. I disagree. Today, the danger to Jews is far graver and more complex than it was in the pagan or medieval-Christian world, or during World War Two.

Today, anti-Jewish, anti-Israeli, and anti-American propaganda has gone global. It is visually masterful, technologically sophisticated, and available around the clock, especially in Arabic. Jews and Zionists can be “seen” holding a meeting of the (fake) Elders of Zion, (falsely) demanding that Jesus be tortured and crucified, committing (fake) massacres in Jenin, and stabbing non-Jewish children to death for their blood.

Old-fashioned Czarist-, Nazi-, and Stalinist-era anti-Semitic stereotypes (the Jews control the media and the banks and seek world domination), have been added to the pre-existing Islamic views of Jews as subhuman infidels. The mix is a hot brew of relentless hatred.

Jew-haters are creating a situation in which — dare I say it? Yes, I must say it — another mass murder — perhaps even a Holocaust-like mass murder of Jews might be possible. Indeed, in my view, it has already begun, certainly not in America, and not yet in Europe — but in Israel.

Today, Jews who live in the Jewish state — a nation that was initially envisioned as the solution to the ceaseless persecution of the Jews — are far more endangered than those who live in the Diaspora. Worse: The existence of the Jewish state is now being used to justify verbal and physical attacks against Diaspora Jews around the world and on campuses throughout the Western world. For example, “Zionism” is an increasingly dirty word on campuses. I am also told that among American teenagers, the word “Jew” is increasingly being used pejoratively.

Israel has served as the laboratory, or ground zero, in the terrorist war against the West. It is where the Islamo-fascists have perfected their experiments, their grisly, spectacular, and well-choreographed mass murders and their ingenious use of hijacked planes.

In my recent book, The New Anti-Semitism: The Current Crisis and What We Must Do About It, I was among the first to characterize the new anti-Semitism as an alliance between Islamofascist terrorists and “politically correct” western intellectuals. Both groups have remained morally blind to the slaughter of innocent civilians in Israel and America. Worse, they have blamed that slaughter on Israeli and American policy. In their frenzy to scapegoat Israel for all human suffering, these new anti-Semites have joined the United Nations, international human rights groups, and the media in failing to condemn the most horrendous human rights abuses in the world, including genocide.

Reality Turned Upside-Down

The propaganda war against Israel and against Jews is staggering, both visually and linguistically. It is often vulgar and blatant but it is also subtle, earnest, persuasive. One is forced to confront Big Lies at every level, socially, professionally, among scholars and in the media.

Today, Israel is the world’s punching-bag symbol for “Colonial, Apartheid, Oppressor.” Although Yaser Arafat began his terrorist campaign against Israel in 1964 when the “offending” settlements were Tel Aviv and Haifa, his terrorism against Israel is justified because of the offending Israeli occupation of Gaza and the West Bank. Let me quote from ex-PLO terrorist Walid Shoebat, who has since converted to Christianity and is now pro-Israel. In an interview in the Jerusalem Post, Shoebat suggested the unthinkable: “The true occupation is of the minds of Palestinians, of teaching them hatred for Jews. That is the real occupation.”

Let me expand upon that. The true occupation also includes the utter Palestinianization and hijacking of the western media and the western academic world into believing that black is white, day is night, that the Palestinian Authority can do no wrong, and Israel can do no right.

Say this on many campuses in North America or Europe and you will be mocked, scorned, intimidated, bullied, raged at, perhaps even physically endangered. And not by illiterate, impoverished, formerly colonized people but by well-heeled tenured faculty and bright doctoral students — some of whom will soon run for public office.

“Politically correct” Americans, including some Jews, have joined Islamists in embracing the Palestinians as the most oppressed and most Noble of Savages whose misery, in their view, has been caused solely by a cabal of Zionists, Orthodox Jews, and Christian Republican conservatives.

This unholy alliance of politically correct progressives and Islamists has presented the long-suffering Palestinians and their corrupt and murderous leadership as secular versions of Jesus crucified. Newspaper cartoonists have literally portrayed Arafat as Jesus. They have also romanticized Arafat, bin Laden, and their human bombs as Che Guevara — and Nelson Mandela-like “freedom fighters.”

Bizarrely, tragically, these new anti-Semites have decided that Israel is the “greatest oppressor of all time,” and is “worse than the Nazis” — surely a new form of Holocaust denial.

They also characterize Israel as an “apartheid” state (which it is not). In fact, Islam is the largest practitioner of apartheid in the world, both in terms of religion and gender; Israel once again is the scapegoat for this.

Today, Israelis are being slaughtered not only because they happen to live in a nation engaged in a local war with a neighboring nation but because Israel is a Jewish nation that has been under almost perpetual siege since its birth in 1948. Twenty-one thousand Israelis have lost their lives in wars of self-defense and in acts of terrorism against the Jewish state since 1948.

Since the fall of 2000, Israelis have endured the equivalent of 9/11 almost every other week. I cannot imagine the level of post-traumatic stress symptomatology Israelis must be suffering — they, who have lived through so many unchosen wars of self-defense and whose parents and grandparents endured Hitler’s Final Solution, the Gulag, Cossack pogroms, and persecution and exile from Arab and Muslim lands.

The Israeli Toll in American Terms

As I’ve noted, the slow-bleed of Israelis from 1948-2000 has been barely noted among western intellectuals. “Everybody dies, other people also suffer. Enough with the Jews!” Jewish blood does not register with them — or, rather, Jews are supposed to die; they are not shocked when it happens. In an attempt to awaken such hard-hearted intellectuals, some of whom are, sadly, Jews, I decided to convert the Israeli reality into American terms.

Thus, from 9/29/2000 to 5/12/04, nine hundred and sixty one (961) Israelis were murdered by terrorists. This represents 0.015% of the Israeli Jewish, Christian, and Muslim population of six million, four hundred thousand. Based on an American population of approximately 293 million, the Israeli civilian death count is the equivalent of 44,005 Americans killed by terrorists on our own soil, in pizza parlors, on buses, at Passover sedorim, in our beds.

In addition, between 9/29/2000 and 5/12/04, a total of 6,344 Israelis were wounded by terrorists, often seriously, and for life. This represents .099% of the Israeli population. In American terms, this is the equivalent of approximately 290,000 Americans wounded by terrorists.

Every Israeli personally knows someone — a parent, a child, a spouse, a co-worker, a neighbor, a friend — who has been killed. Every Israeli personally knows someone who has been wounded for life. Ads for hospital beds and orthopedic devices regularly appear in mainstream newspapers, not in medical journals.

And yet, our “best and brightest” suggest that the Jews are “paranoid” about anti-Semitism, “alarmist,” “neurotic,” that Hitler killed millions of people who were not Jews (“Why do the Jews go on and on only about themselves as if they are the only victims?”), that the Israelis are now perpetuating a “Holocaust” upon the Palestinians, (another way of saying that “Hitler should have finished the Jews off”), that Israel is a “colonial” state that should be abolished — exterminated — and that this suggestion, which is being made by many progressives and intellectuals, does not necessarily amount to Jew-hatred.

Even Orwell might weep at this.

Meanwhile, as some Jewish American organizations launch major fundraising drives pegged to these latest alarming trends, their leaders hasten to reassure us that Jews in America are relatively safe; that Israel has a strong military, including a nuclear strike capacity. All true.

 

But if Israel (G-d forbid) ceases to exist, if America is fatefully weakened by the terrorist threat against it — who are we? If the Jews of Israel, Europe, and South America remain at peril — what then? Is it “okay” that we’re “okay” in America?

Hillel asked three questions, not just one. Let me remind us of these questions: “If I’m not for myself, who will be for me?” “When I am only for myself, what am I?” “And, if not now, when?”

Many Jewish progressives gloss over Hillel’s first question and focus only on his last two questions. Some Jews are often the first to demonize the Jewish state and the Jewish religion in their zeal to institute social justice as if doing so is a substitute for G-d.

Yes, of course Israel has made mistakes; what nation hasn’t? But nothing — I repeat, nothing — that Israel has done deserves the savage, obsessive, demonization and terrorism against it. The Israel Defense Forces have behaved with exquisite moral restraint given the enormous provocation against the Jewish state. They have not been congratulated for this but rather condemned.

Call to Action

As I have documented in my book about the new anti-Semitism, anti-Zionism is today’s new anti-Semitism.

So, what must we do? We must stand up to The Big Lies. We must take back the campuses. We must forge an alliance with Christian and Republican Americans to fight the war against terrorism and for a safe Israel. And yes, of course, the Israeli government and Jewish organizations and individuals must continue talking with Arab and world leaders.

But my most radical suggestion is a gathering of the twelve tribes. This must be undertaken in the same spirit in which Theodor Herzl convened the first World Zionist Congress. So many Jews who hold passionate and opposing views have simply stopped listening and talking to each other. The silence is more awful than arguments. Many Jews no longer act as if they believe the ‘Other’ has been created in G-d’s image. We must come together in order to strategize about our very survival.

Let me suggest that we consult the Torah for some perspective and guidance. What does the Torah teach us about anti-Semitism?

Early on, we see that G-d accepts Abel’s offering but rejects Cain’s. Despite G-d’s intervention, the heartbroken and enraged Cain kills his brother Abel, whose offering was “chosen” by G-d.

Yaakov favored Yosef — and Yosef’s older half-brothers envied, resented, and hated him. Yosef, the absolute apple of his father’s eye, the precocious dream-interpreter, the young peacock who struts about in his distinctive coat — oh how his brothers want him out of the way. Some want to kill him but they settle for selling him into slavery. Divine destiny will have Yosef both rescuing his people from famine and forgiving his brothers.

What happens when one is chosen, not only by one’s biological father but by G-d, one’s heavenly parent?

One breaks the hearts of all those who have not been chosen and such heartbreak often leads to envy and resentment. Oddly enough, despite the considerable hardship and danger, many people still want to be “the chosen one.”

While Jews do not cause Jew-hatred — nor does Israeli policy — we must also quietly consider that our chosenness, (or at least our perceived chosenness), does seem to have certain consequences. We are the first People of the Book and are, psychologically and theologically, the Mothers and Fathers of all those who have followed in our monotheistic footsteps. In addition, our Jewish ideas about G-d, mitzvot, justice, ethics, mercy, have indeed gotten us into trouble with all those who wish to worship idols, engage in child sacrifice, and to murder, rape, slander, and steal. The glory of being “chosen” is also a dangerous and difficult burden.

New York’s Highest Court Strikes Down Noncitizen Voting Law, Citing State Constitution

Minnesota
Minnesota Election Judge Faces Felony Charges For Allowing Unregistered People To Vote

New York’s Highest Court Strikes Down Noncitizen Voting Law, Citing State Constitution

Edited by: TJVNews.com

In a landmark decision that underscores the constitutional boundaries of voting rights in New York State, the New York Court of Appeals—the state’s highest judicial authority—has struck down a 2021 New York City law that would have granted voting rights to noncitizen residents in local elections. As reported by The New York Times, the ruling, issued on Thursday in a 6-1 decision, concludes that the law violated the State Constitution by attempting to extend the franchise beyond its clearly defined citizenry.

The law in question, officially known as Local Law 11, had been passed by the New York City Council during the final days of then-Mayor Bill de Blasio’s administration. It sought to enfranchise approximately 800,000 legal permanent residents, such as green card holders and individuals with work authorization, allowing them to vote in municipal elections—provided they had resided in the city for at least 30 days. While hailed by immigrant advocacy groups as a bold step toward inclusive democracy, the measure never went into effect due to immediate legal challenges.

According to the information provided in The New York Times report, Chief Judge Rowan D. Wilson, writing for the majority, left no ambiguity about the constitutional constraints governing the right to vote in New York. “It is plain from the language and restrictions contained in Article II that ‘citizen’ is not meant as a floor, but as a condition of voter eligibility,” Judge Wilson stated. He emphasized that the State Constitution clearly requires citizenship as a prerequisite, framing it not merely as a guideline but as a non-negotiable criterion.

However, in a noteworthy dissenting opinion, Judge Jenny Rivera offered a contrasting perspective. As quoted by The New York Times, Judge Rivera acknowledged the constitutional limits but emphasized that the state’s governing document also authorizes municipal self-governance. “The Constitution specifically authorizes municipal self-governance,” she wrote, “and so the city could exercise this power to enact Local Law 11 — but only by referendum.” Her dissent underscores a critical distinction: while the city may possess the authority to shape its own electoral rules, such a change must ultimately be validated by voters through a formal ballot measure.

The ruling represents a significant legal and political victory for those who opposed the law, particularly Republican Party leaders who filed the initial legal challenge. As noted by The New York Times, Republicans framed the measure as emblematic of what they characterized as Democratic overreach and misaligned priorities in the governance of New York City. They used the case as a rhetorical tool in broader national debates about voting rights, immigration, and the integrity of elections.

The Republican challenge aligned with a broader conservative strategy seen across the United States, where legal and legislative efforts have increasingly been directed at restricting access to the ballot box. As The New York Times reported, measures such as stringent voter ID laws and voter roll purges have become prominent features of this movement, reflecting a larger political trend toward narrowing the electorate under the guise of electoral security.

Although Mayor de Blasio and his successor, Mayor Eric Adams, both raised constitutional concerns about Local Law 11, neither chose to veto or sign it, effectively allowing it to become law by default. The New York Times report highlighted this political ambivalence, noting that while the legislation represented a progressive milestone, it also posed legal risks that were never fully addressed by the executive branch.

Following its passage, Local Law 11 faced swift legal action. In 2022, a lower court—the New York Supreme Court—struck it down, asserting that such a fundamental change in voter eligibility required a statewide referendum, not just city-level legislation. That decision laid the groundwork for the eventual appeal to the Court of Appeals, which has now definitively closed the chapter on this legislative effort.

However, Judge Rivera conceded that even this aspiration must ultimately be pursued through a statewide vote—a constitutional amendment process requiring broad public consensus. As noted in The New York Times report, her opinion signals that while the goal of immigrant enfranchisement may be morally and politically compelling to many, it cannot circumvent the legal foundations that currently govern electoral participation in New York.

The decision carries far-reaching implications not only for New York City, but also for other municipalities across the country considering similar measures. By affirming the constitutional requirement of citizenship for voting eligibility, the New York Court of Appeals has set a powerful precedent that will likely influence future legislative initiatives and judicial interpretations in other states.

As reported by The New York Times, Mayor Adams’ office responded to the ruling with a brief statement: “The highest court in New York State has made its decision, and we respect the court’s ruling.” It remains to be seen whether lawmakers will pursue a constitutional amendment or explore alternative strategies for expanding civic participation among immigrant communities.

The decision has been sharply criticized by legal scholars and civil rights organizations. Cesar Ruiz, associate counsel at LatinoJustice PRLDEF, who argued the case on appeal, expressed profound disappointment, calling the ruling “a terrible setback for our immigrant communities who contribute so much to the well-being of the city,” according to the report in The New York Times.

In a similar vein, Roderick M. Hills Jr., a constitutional law professor at New York University who supported the law through an amicus brief, argued that the court disregarded historical precedent. He pointed out in a statement to The New York Times that New York women were allowed to vote in state elections even before the Constitution was formally amended to permit it, thereby challenging the notion that voter qualifications must always be aligned with the constitution’s strictest letter. “The court simply ignored the longstanding principle that voting qualifications for local offices have never been identical to the state constitutional qualifications to vote,” Hills wrote. Still, he noted that the court stopped short of stripping the city of its broader authority to design local electoral systems—a modest silver lining in an otherwise restrictive judgment.

As The New York Times report detailed, the ruling was met with jubilation by Republican officials, many of whom had framed Local Law 11 as a radical overreach by Democratic lawmakers. State Senate Minority Leader Rob Ortt declared triumphantly, “Even the stacked Court of Appeals cannot deny the fact that the sacred right to vote is one that belongs to the American citizen only.”

Echoing this sentiment, Staten Island Borough President Vito J. Fossella, a lead plaintiff in the legal challenge, praised the decision as a vindication of constitutional clarity. “There are policies and decisions that are being made by some of the people in power at the city and state that really go over the line for people who might be middle of the road,” Fossella told The New York Times. He characterized the law as emblematic of a broader disconnect between progressive lawmakers and mainstream New Yorkers.

“The ruling really is just a validation of what we have maintained since Day 1,” Fossella added, “which is that the New York State Constitution is crystal clear on who can and cannot vote.”

The court’s decision raises profound questions about the balance between local autonomy and state constitutional supremacy, as well as the evolving role of immigrants in urban governance. Although the ruling did not fully eliminate New York City’s ability to legislate its own voting procedures, it clearly delineated the constitutional limits within which such efforts must operate.

Even those sympathetic to expanding voter eligibility acknowledged that future reform efforts will now require a much more rigorous process—namely, a statewide referendum to amend the Constitution, according to The New York Times report. In effect, this decision sets a high bar for any future attempt to reimagine the composition of the local electorate, relegating noncitizen voting rights to a distant political aspiration rather than an imminent legislative reality.

Century-Old East Village Synagogue to Be Demolished for Luxury Condos, Sparking Outcry Over Erased Heritage

The former site of the Lemberger Synagogue, converted to Iglesia Bautista Emmanuel in the 1970s, is set to be demolished and converted into a condominium. (Courtesy Greenwich Village Society for Historic Preservation and NYC Municipal Archives)

 

By: Fern Sidman

In a move that preservationists say reflects the erasure of immigrant heritage in favor of real estate profits, a century-old former synagogue in Manhattan’s East Village is slated for demolition to make way for six upscale condominium units. As was reported by The New York Post on Friday, the building at 256 East 4th Street, once a spiritual and cultural haven for Ukrainian Jewish immigrants, will soon be reduced to rubble—an outcome that has drawn sharp criticism from historic preservation advocates.

Originally erected in 1925, the building served as the synagogue for the Lemberger Congregation, a religious and community hub for immigrants from Lemberg—present-day Lviv, Ukraine. The structure has borne silent witness to nearly a century of demographic and cultural shifts in the neighborhood. However, preservationists argue that the city’s latest development trajectory is quickly burying this living history beneath glass-and-steel modernity.

“This vintage house of worship doesn’t have a prayer,” The New York Post reported, capturing the frustration of activists who see this demolition as another chapter in the slow dismantling of the East Village’s rich immigrant past.

According to the information provided in The New York Post report, the site transitioned from a synagogue to a Spanish-language Baptist church, known as Iglesia Bautista Emmanuel, in the 1970s—a transformation marked by the replacement of the Star of David on the building’s rondel with a Christian cross. The church served the local Hispanic community for decades before selling the property in November 2023 to developer Ariel Sholomov for $2.95 million.

Now, the property is set to be demolished to accommodate six luxury condominiums. Although unit prices have yet to be released, comparable one-bedroom condos in the neighborhood currently list between $1.2 million and $2.1 million, according to data cited by The New York Post via StreetEasy.

The impending demolition has ignited public backlash, particularly from Village Preservation, an advocacy group long involved in protecting the architectural and cultural legacy of downtown Manhattan. Andrew Berman, the group’s executive director, told The New York Post, “Pieces of the building will survive, but none of the façade.” He lamented that what should be a commemorative preservation of the site’s layered history is instead becoming yet another exercise in architectural amnesia.

“There is this memory of, and connection to, this very rich history—but instead, here they just want to destroy it and start over again, which is a shame,” Berman added.

The organization had previously submitted a proposal in 2019 to the Landmarks Preservation Commission (LPC), urging the creation of a new East Village Historic District encompassing the synagogue and other architecturally significant sites along Avenues B and C. But according to The New York Post, the LPC never moved the proposal forward—not even bringing it to a hearing—despite similar designations being long established in neighborhoods like Greenwich Village and the Upper East Side.

The project’s architect, Stephen Conte, defended the decision to raze the structure, telling The New York Post that decades of water damage had compromised the already-thin front walls, rendering the façade structurally unsound and unsafe. “We’re going to see if there are any interior design elements we can keep that don’t have any toxic materials or mold,” Conte said, noting the possible retention of items like stained glass windows and wooden doors.

In an attempt to offer some architectural continuity, Conte said the new building will feature a red brick exterior to maintain a contextual look on the block. However, he also pointed to broader technical constraints in balancing preservation with modern energy standards. “Building preservation is getting trickier,” he said, referring to the city’s push toward zero-emission electricity goals. He explained that older façades often allow too much air leakage, making it difficult to meet insulation requirements for modern, energy-efficient buildings.

But for Berman and other preservationists, these justifications fall flat. “It’s virtually never impossible to reuse and preserve a façade,” Berman countered, as reported by The New York Post. “Even if there was damage, nothing like that is unfixable. Clearly respecting that history was not a priority for them.”

“They basically sat on it and ignored it,” Berman said bluntly, describing a multi-year campaign that has yet to see any meaningful action from the city’s primary preservation agency. “We’re now waging a campaign to try to get them to refocus their attention on this area,” he added, signaling a renewed push to bring the issue back into the public spotlight.

According to The New York Post, a representative from the LPC defended the agency’s selective approach to landmarking, stating that while public input is welcome, the agency itself is responsible for identifying and prioritizing buildings and neighborhoods for designation. Yet Berman and others argue that this approach allows potentially irreplaceable structures to fall through the cracks, particularly in neighborhoods like the East Village where real estate developers are eager to build without regulatory constraints.

“This is a part of town that real estate interests have a great desire to have as free a hand as possible,” Berman told The New York Post. He emphasized that the city’s failure to act amounts to de facto endorsement of those development pressures, even at the cost of erasing deep-rooted immigrant, cultural, and artistic histories.

“There’s really hundreds of buildings that we would argue are of some historic significance in the East Village that don’t enjoy landmark protection at all,” Berman said. He pointed to high-profile examples such as the New York Eye and Ear Infirmary and Theatre 80 on St. Mark’s Place—both of which lack protection despite their historic and architectural value.

While the fate of 256 East 4th Street shines a spotlight on the city’s shortcomings, Berman acknowledged that there are some instances where adaptive reuse and preservation have successfully coexisted. As cited by The New York Post, buildings such as 242 East 7th Street and 638 East 6th Street—both former houses of worship—have been repurposed into residential and community spaces while retaining their original facades and architectural character.

Similarly, the Congregation Mezritch Synagogue at 415 East 6th Street stands as a testament to what is possible when preservation efforts are taken seriously. Though the structure was converted into luxury condominiums, its basement-level synagogue space was preserved, thanks to landmark status that provided a legal buffer against total redevelopment.

“Life in our city sometimes is complicated, but sometimes it takes complex solutions to get the best results,” Berman remarked, emphasizing the importance of nuanced preservation strategies that can balance modern needs with historical integrity.

Despite these success stories, Berman warned that the broader trajectory remains troubling. “There are many, many other places in the East Village connected to immigrant history, cultural history, labor history, and musical history that, without landmark designation, could disappear tomorrow,” he told The New York Post. His comments serve as a stark reminder that the city’s historic fabric—especially in neighborhoods built by working-class and immigrant communities—remains vulnerable to economic pressures and institutional neglect.

As demolition crews prepare to dismantle yet another chapter of New York’s immigrant past, preservationists say the time for piecemeal efforts has passed. They are calling for a comprehensive, citywide commitment to landmarking and adaptive reuse—one that doesn’t merely preserve buildings, but the layered stories, cultures, and communities that built them.

Federal Judge Blocks DOGE From Accessing Social Security Information for Now

By Jack Phillips(Epoch Times)

A federal judge on Thursday temporarily blocked the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), fronted by Elon Musk, from personal Social Security Administration (SSA) information, delivering another judicial setback for the Trump administration.

In a 137-page temporary restraining order, U.S. District Judge Ellen Hollander wrote that DOGE also must delete any personally identifiable data that it may have in its possession.
“The American public may well applaud and support the Trump Administration’s mission to root out fraud, waste, and bloat from federal agencies, including SSA, to the extent it exists. But, by what means and methods?” the Maryland-based judge asked in her conclusion. “The DOGE Team is essentially engaged in a fishing expedition at SSA, in search of a fraud epidemic, based on little more than suspicion.”

DOGE appears to have started “a search for the proverbial needle in the haystack, without any concrete knowledge that the needle is actually in the haystack,” she also said, adding that the SSA provided DOGE staff with Americans’ personal records.

That included “unbridled access to the personal and private data of millions of Americans, including but not limited to Social Security numbers, medical records, mental health records, hospitalization records, drivers’ license numbers, bank and credit card information, tax information, income history, work history, birth and marriage certificates, and home and work addresses,” the judge said.

Plaintiffs who filed their lawsuit against SSA said that DOGE had “nearly unlimited” access that violates privacy laws and presents massive information security risks. The lawsuit was led by the American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees union.

In their initial complaint filed in February at the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland, the union and other plaintiffs argued that DOGE’s activity at the SSA is “not just an unprecedented data grab” but also “an unprecedented power grab.”

Describing DOGE’s efforts as “overreach,” the plaintiffs said the department is “threatening to review and expose the personal data of millions of Americans, without any express authority, and in violation of the many protections Congress and the Executive Branch have erected to protect against such data mining and misuse.”

Lawyers for the Trump administration argued in court papers submitted earlier this month that the union and other plaintiffs lack standing, or the legal concept that allows a party to bring a lawsuit, because they have not suffered any injury.

Trump administration lawyers said in court that DOGE has a 10-person team of federal employees at the SSA, seven of whom have been granted read-only access to agency systems or personally identifiable information. Those officials have received privacy training and eight passed background checks as of earlier this month, lawyers said.

They also said that the plaintiffs were not able to provide evidence that they will face imminent harm by allowing DOGE to access the SSA database.

“Both the equities and the public interest support permitting the government to exercise its lawful authority to hire employees and give those employees access to systems as required for their job duties,” they wrote in response, adding that DOGE is targeting waste and fraud in the federal government.

Musk and DOGE have said the department has discovered that millions of purported individuals aged 120 or older—with some as old as more than 220 years and one that’s 360 years old—are listed as eligible for Social Security benefits. Acting Social Security head Lee Dudek issued a statement in February that acknowledged their findings but said those individuals aren’t necessarily receiving benefits.

In separate cases, several judges have raised questions about DOGE’s sweeping cost-cutting efforts, but they have not always concluded that the risks are imminent enough to block the department from accessing government systems.

SBA to Take Over Student Loans as Department of Education Is Overhauled, Trump Says

President Donald Trump announced on March 21 that two primary functions of the Department of Education will be moved to other federal agencies.’

Student loan processing will be moved to the Small Business Administration (SBA), and the oversight of funding and some programming for students with special needs will be moved to the Department of Health and Human Services.

This announcement comes less than 24 hours after Trump signed an executive order calling for the agency’s partial elimination while preserving funding and oversight for Pell grants, special education, and Title I funding for low-income students.

“Those two elements will be taken out of the Department of Education, and then all we have to do is get the students to get guidance from the people that love them and cherish them—including their parents, by the way, who will be totally involved in their education, along with the boards (of education) and the governors and the states,” Trump said this morning.

Trump said these steps will save taxpayers a significant amount of money while improving public education in all states.

“It’s going to be a great situation,” he said.

Trump noted on March 20 that special education funding and oversight in its current form would not be affected by his executive order, though in remarks the following day he said that “special needs and all the nutrition programs” will be moved to Health and Human Services.

Either way, the federal Individuals with Disabilities Act, which predates the Department of Education’s creation in 1979, requires public schools to accommodate special needs of students with physical, mental, and emotional impairments, and the federal government is tasked with its enforcement, according to the Department of Education’s website.

The federal and state governments split most of the costs for special education, which can make up a large chunk of public school budgets because individualized learning plans are required for special needs students. For many students, that includes assessments and a team of case workers and specialized teachers, depending on their disability.

It’s not uncommon for schools to assign a full-time employee to one special needs student who is mainstreamed into regular classes, largely for the purpose of minimizing disruptions to the other students.

During recent congressional hearings pertaining to K–12 education reform, school choice advocates criticized the current state of special education, noting that the system is riddled with lawsuits between parents seeking assessments and individualized learning plans and school administrators worried about staff and funding limitations.

Federal student loans, meanwhile, are expected to remain in forbearance through the end of the year under a prior notification from the Department of Education.

Interest will not accrue until after the Trump administration outlines new requirements for repayment. The SBA will be expected to announce changes from former President Joe Biden’s Saving on a Valuable Education program in the weeks ahead.

Trump Admin Grants 30 Day Extension for NYC to End Congestion Toll for Manhattan Drivers

The Trump administration announced on March 20 that it is extending a deadline it gave to New York City last month to end its $9 congestion pricing program for drivers entering parts of Manhattan.

In February, the U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Highway Administration terminated approval of the program and gave the New York Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA)—which operates the city’s subways, buses, and regional rail networks—until March 21 to stop collecting tolls from drivers entering Manhattan.
However, in a statement on social media platform X, Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the federal government is now extending the original deadline by 30 days as discussions continue.
 Duffy also took aim at New York Gov. Kathy Hochul.

 

“Your refusal to end cordon pricing and your open disrespect towards the federal government is unacceptable,” he wrote.

“Just as your high tolls and no free road option are a slap in the face to hard working Americans, your refusal to approve two vital pipelines that will lower fuel costs by 50% are against the public’s best interests.

“Your unlawful pricing scheme charges working-class citizens to use roads their federal tax dollars already paid to build.

“Know that the billions of dollars the federal government sends to New York are not a blank check. Continued noncompliance will not be taken lightly.”

The congestion pricing program went into effect in New York City on Jan. 5, in addition to tolls drivers already pay to cross bridges and tunnels into Manhattan.

Hochul’s administration says the program is meant to help relieve traffic congestion, tackle pollution, and provide millions of dollars in new revenue to the city’s beleaguered transit system.
Under the program, drivers of passenger and small commercial vehicles entering Manhattan below 60th Street during peak hours—from 5 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekdays and from 9 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekends—are charged a standard fee of $9. From 9 p.m. to 5 a.m. on weekdays and from 9 p.m. to 9 a.m. on weekends, that fare goes down to $2.25.

For motorcycles, that toll is $4.50 during the peak period and $1.05 during the overnight period.

Additionally, small trucks and some buses will pay $14.40 during peak hours and $3.60 during the non-peak period, and large trucks and tour buses pay a toll of $21.60 during the peak period and $5.40 during the overnight period.

The program, which offers some discounts to low-income drivers, drew opposition from the Trump administration amid concerns that it will unfairly impact working-class Americans and small businesses.

New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy and Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) also called for the program to be stopped, citing concerns over its impact on New Jersey commuters.

Despite those concerns, the MTA has said it does not intend to pull the congestion pricing plan. Last month, it filed a lawsuit challenging the Transportation Department’s termination, arguing the move is unlawful.
Hochul took to X shortly after Duffy’s post to double down on her stance, sharing a post she originally shared on the platform in February after the Transportation Department pulled federal approval of the program.

“The cameras are staying on,” the post reads, seemingly referring to the system of traffic cameras used to assess the tolls to drivers in the congestion zone.

Avi Small, a spokesperson for Hochul’s office, also shrugged off the new deadline in a statement to the media.

“We’ve seen Secretary Duffy’s tweet, which doesn’t change what Governor Hochul has been saying all along: the cameras are staying on,” Small said.

Boeing to Build Secretive Future Fighter Jet, Trump Announces

President Donald Trump on Friday announced that the U.S. Air Force had awarded Boeing a contract to develop the U.S. Air Force’s secretive next-generation fighter jet.

 

Trump said this new fighter jet will be designated the F-47.

“After a rigorous and thorough competition between some of America’s top aerospace companies, the Air Force is going to be awarding the contract for the next generation air dominance platform to Boeing,” Trump said in an announcement from the White House on March 21.

The president said an experimental version of Boeing’s F-47 airframe has been flying in secret for nearly five years.

 

“And we’re confident that it massively overpowers the capabilities of any other nation,” he said.

Details about the aircraft design remain secret, and Trump said he would not specify the price for the program because it could give hints about the size of the aircraft and some of the technology it will include.

The Air Force’s effort to build a new fighter jet, known as the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) program, calls for an aircraft that has advanced new propulsion and stealth capabilities. The Air Force has envisioned an advanced manned aircraft that could be paired with stealthy fighter drones being developed in a parallel effort known as the Collaborative Combat Aircraft program.

NGAD has been in development since at least 2014 but has been on hold since the summer of 2024 amid concerns about the service’s budget for new weapons programs.

In a sign that NGAD was making new progress, the Air Force announced earlier this month that it had assigned fighter aircraft designations to two separate prototype drones being developed for the Collaborative Combat Aircraft program. The prototype drones, developed by General Atomics and Anduril Industries, are the first U.S. drone airframes ever to bear fighter designations and are currently projected to begin flight testing this summer.

“This is a historic investment in the American military, in the American industrial base, in American industry, that will help revive the warrior ethos inside our military,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said as he joined Trump in the Oval Office for the contract announcement.

Friday’s contract announcement comes as a boon for Boeing, which has faced recent worker strikes and operational challenges. The aerospace and defense company has faced recent lawsuits over flaws and mishaps with its commercial airliners, delays on a contract to deliver the next series of presidential transport planes, and problems operating the Boeing Starliner spacecraft during a recent space mission.

Herzog speaks to Wiz CEO after $32b purchase by Google

President Isaac Herzog’s office has calmed controversy by announcing that there will be no meetings on Shabbat during his visit to Germany. (Haim Zach/GPO)

“You are bringing immense pride to the State of Israel. This is an unimaginable achievement that showcases Israeli ingenuity, the tremendous capabilities of Israeli high-tech, the strength of Israel’s economy and our resilience as a nation—especially in a year like this,” said Herzog during the call.

“This is incredible news for the country, making waves worldwide. I have deep appreciation for you, your team and, of course, the investors, entrepreneurs and developers. Thank you all—I salute you,” he added.

Google parent company Alphabet on Tuesday confirmed its acquisition of the Israeli cloud security firm, making it the tech giant’s largest deal to date.

The move aims to strengthen Google Cloud’s security offerings amid growing competition from AWS and Microsoft.

Founded in 2020, Wiz has rapidly expanded, generating $500 million in annual recurring revenue and serving nearly half of the top 100 U.S. companies. Despite joining Google Cloud, Wiz’s security products will remain available on other platforms, including AWS and Azure.

The deal is subject to regulatory approval, and experts anticipate potential antitrust scrutiny before finalization later this year.

Talks on what was originally supposed to be a $23 billion deal reportedly fell apart in July 2024.

“This is a moment of Israeli pride and a significant statement of Google’s confidence in Israeli talent and the people of Israel—especially in these difficult times,” Rappaport told Herzog on Friday.

“This is not only one of Google’s biggest deals in history, but it’s also the largest private acquisition ever. We are embarking on a new and equally challenging journey. This is just a milestone toward something much greater, and it presents a tremendous opportunity for Israel to establish itself as a global cybersecurity hub,” he added.

Google has shown interest in the Israeli market, in 2013 purchasing Waze for $1.1 billion, creating the Jewish state’s first domestic unicorn (a startup reaching $1 billion in valuation without being listed on the stock market).

If completed, the deal would surpass Google’s previous biggest acquisition: the $12.5 billion purchase of Motorola Mobility in 2012.

While Wiz is headquartered in New York City, with nearly 1,000 employees scattered across North America and Europe, most of its engineering team is based in Tel Aviv, where the 41-year-old Rappaport was born.

Douglas Edelman’s Lavish Life Unravels in One of the Largest Alleged U.S. Tax Evasion Cases

Douglas Edelman’s Lavish Life Unravels in One of the Largest Alleged U.S. Tax Evasion Cases

Edited by: TJVNews.com

It was a sun-drenched July day on the Spanish party island of Ibiza when the long arm of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service finally reached Douglas Edelman. For the 73-year-old American expatriate—once immersed in a glittering world of luxury villas, foreign bank accounts, and high-stakes defense contracting—the arrest marked a jarring end to decades of wealth and evasion.

As reported by The Wall Street Journal, Edelman’s story is a cautionary tale that has stunned legal observers, tax professionals, and international investors alike. The U.S. Department of Justice has charged him with one of the most significant cases of alleged tax evasion in recent memory—an accusation involving more than $350 million in undeclared income and an estimated $129 million in lost taxes.

Edelman’s improbable journey began far from the beaches of Ibiza. Decades earlier, he walked away from his life in Texas and set his sights on the crumbling Soviet Union. As the Iron Curtain fell, Edelman moved first to Moscow and later to Kyrgyzstan, hoping to capitalize on the economic chaos that followed.

According to The Wall Street Journal report, his big break came in the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, when the U.S. military surged into Afghanistan. Edelman and a business partner seized an opportunity to supply fuel and other critical services, securing contracts that would eventually be worth a staggering $7 billion.

Flush with newfound wealth, Edelman embraced a life of extravagance. He married Delphine Le Dain, a French journalist with a cosmopolitan flair, and together they purchased homes in idyllic beachside and mountain locales across Europe. The couple’s crown jewel was a $43 million double mansion in one of London’s most prestigious neighborhoods, intended as the home where they would raise their family.

Their financial footprint expanded even further. The Wall Street Journal report detailed Edelman’s investments in Hollywood films, Balkan media outlets, China’s information sector, and even MTV’s regional affiliate. His bank accounts swelled—many in Switzerland—while his lifestyle became a patchwork of yachts, fine dining, and globe-trotting opulence.

Despite his overseas lifestyle, Edelman was still legally required to file U.S. tax returns. For years, he didn’t. Then in 2016—under increasing scrutiny—he submitted filings to the IRS claiming that his wife, a non-American citizen, owned the companies tied to the lucrative defense contracts. Edelman characterized himself merely as a consultant earning under $1 million annually.

Subsequent returns from 2016 to 2020 maintained the same narrative. Because Le Dain is a French citizen, she was not subject to U.S. taxation—an arrangement that Edelman and Le Dain allegedly exploited to their advantage. But as The Wall Street Journal reported, a whistleblower eventually alerted U.S. authorities to what prosecutors now describe as a complex, calculated deception.

According to the Justice Department, Edelman and Le Dain engaged in a scheme to falsely represent ownership of the defense contracting firms and to conceal Edelman’s control over hundreds of millions of dollars in assets. The government contends that Edelman violated foreign bank account reporting laws and structured trusts to obscure his wealth, hiding what prosecutors believe to be over $350 million in income.

When Spanish authorities apprehended Edelman in Ibiza last summer, he was still in his shorts—just a day after celebrating July Fourth in his Mediterranean hideaway. He was extradited to the U.S. in September and initially placed under house arrest in a high-rise condo in Alexandria, Virginia.

But his legal troubles quickly deepened. In December, The Wall Street Journal reported that Edelman’s bail was revoked after prosecutors revealed he had texted potential witnesses in the case, a breach of the court’s conditions. Edelman, claiming loneliness, insisted he meant no harm—but the court was unmoved, sending him back to jail as he awaits trial.

Meanwhile, Le Dain—scheduled to join her husband in Virginia—fled to France and has not returned to the United States. She has not entered a plea, and her status remains uncertain.

According to prosecutors, the case is not just about one man’s evasion—it’s about what they describe as a betrayal of the American taxpayer. “Edelman grew wealthy on the backs of the American taxpayers in the post-9/11 war effort, only to engage in a decades-long scheme to evade paying his own taxes,” they argued in a December court filing, as cited by The Wall Street Journal.

Legal experts are closely watching the proceedings, which could have profound implications for other U.S. citizens living abroad. The case underscores the IRS’s intensified scrutiny of foreign-held assets and complex trust structures—especially those used by affluent expatriates.

Edelman’s journey began in the margins of global commerce and ended in the gilded corridors of international finance and political scrutiny. As The Wall Street Journal chronicled, his transformation from a U.S.-based trader of orange-juice concentrate and vegetable oil to a multi-millionaire contractor for the Pentagon is a tale uniquely shaped by the collapse of the Soviet Union and the U.S. military response to 9/11.

In the early 1990s, Edelman arrived in Moscow, drawn by the whirlwind privatization of state assets and the chaos of post-Soviet capitalism. There, he struck deals with ambitious oligarchs, while enjoying a lifestyle punctuated by jazz clubs, celebrity parties, and a new Russian girlfriend.

He soon moved to Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan, then a fledgling democracy newly separated from Soviet rule. In an effort to recreate some of Moscow’s cultural vibrancy, he opened an American-style bar and grill in a repurposed theater, as per the information in The Wall Street Journal report.  It was in this unlikely setting that he met French journalist Delphine Le Dain, whose worldly intellect and elegance matched Edelman’s roguish charm. They married in 2000—she paid for much of the wedding—and began building a life that would soon become defined by international opulence.

After the September 11 attacks, Kyrgyzstan agreed to host an American air base at Manas, a key logistical hub for U.S. operations in Afghanistan. Already entrenched in regional fuel supply chains, Edelman capitalized on this opportunity with stunning success. Together with a local business partner, he created a lucrative enterprise supplying aviation fuel through two sister companies—Mina Corp. and Red Star Enterprises.

As The Wall Street Journal reported, U.S. military dollars poured in. The contracts were worth billions, and Edelman’s fortune exploded. He and Le Dain relocated to London, joining the ranks of post-Soviet oligarchs who had also made the city their financial playground.

The couple’s crowning real estate acquisition—a palatial $43 million mansion—stood near the U.S. chargé d’affaires’s residence. The house had a storied past, having belonged to two former business magnates, both of whom later served time for financial crimes—a twist that now seems eerily prescient.

In London, Edelman expanded his ambitions into the arts and media. According to the report in The Wall Street Journal, his Mayfair office became a creative hive filled with screenwriters and filmmakers. He helped finance a 2008 biopic about evangelist Billy Graham, which featured one of his daughters in a supporting role and another on the soundtrack. In total, he burned through nearly $90 million funding projects from the Balkans to Hollywood to China.

Le Dain managed the household and oversaw a growing empire of properties and staff. The couple had three daughters together, and she devoted herself to their education while cultivating her own interest in European art and politics.

Friends became accustomed to Edelman’s generosity—he routinely picked up the tab for travel, hotels, and lavish dinners. Behind the scenes, however, his financial reporting to U.S. authorities told a very different story.

Unlike most of the world, the U.S. taxes based on citizenship, not residency. Americans abroad still need to file annual tax returns and report foreign bank accounts. To avoid double taxation, they may use foreign tax credits—but this system is far from simple. Foreign spouses, such as Le Dain, typically aren’t subject to U.S. taxes unless they reside in the country.

As The Wall Street Journal report explained, it is both common and perfectly legal for Americans living overseas to register assets and property under the name of a foreign spouse. Many expatriates view this as a practical, even prudent, decision. But Edelman’s case—now under intense scrutiny by the IRS and the Department of Justice—could bring new attention to the line between strategic asset placement and outright tax evasion.

In 2016, years after his windfall, Edelman finally began filing U.S. tax returns. He reported modest income—under $1 million a year—from “consulting,” claiming that Le Dain owned the companies and thus shielding their primary income from U.S. taxation. But following a whistleblower tip, federal investigators allege this was a façade.

Prosecutors contend that Edelman falsely declared ownership, set up trusts in Le Dain’s name to mask control over assets, and violated reporting obligations for foreign bank accounts, according to The Wall Street Journal report.  The IRS now alleges he concealed more than $350 million in income, resulting in an estimated $129 million in unpaid taxes, excluding penalties or interest.

 

Edelman was arrested in Ibiza in July 2024, held briefly in jail, then extradited to the U.S. where he was granted house arrest with a $12.9 million unsecured bail. But after contacting potential witnesses—allegedly out of loneliness—he was returned to custody. Le Dain, who was expected to join him in the U.S., fled to France and has not entered a plea.

Edelman and his wife cultivated a social circle that extended well beyond business. Their preferred company included intellectuals, filmmakers, and European aristocrats. According to The Wall Street Journal, Edelman’s ventures even involved individuals from storied lineages—a descendant of Queen Elizabeth I’s 16th-century lord high treasurer worked on his payroll, while a godson of King Charles lent support in efforts to provide internet access for American troops in Afghanistan.

But behind the curated elegance of their lives—filled with Mayfair real estate, art salons, yachts, and private education for their children—was an increasingly complex and opaque financial structure that prosecutors allege was designed to conceal vast wealth from the IRS.

As The Wall Street Journal reported, Edelman’s offshore empire was meticulously designed. Working alongside wealth advisers, attorneys, and a trusted London accountant, he created offshore companies and opened Swiss bank accounts. Though Americans have been legally required since 1970 to report foreign accounts, enforcement was lax for decades. It wasn’t until the late 2000s—when U.S. authorities cracked down on Swiss banks—that individuals like Edelman found themselves under sharper scrutiny.

In 2008, Credit Suisse dropped Edelman as a client, warning that he would need to disclose his corporate accounts to U.S. authorities or move his funds elsewhere. According to court records cited by The Wall Street Journal, he responded by moving his holdings to other Swiss banks and enlisting an American associate with an Irish passport to help route assets through Singapore, the Bahamas, and the United Arab Emirates.

Edelman’s fortune had been largely built through defense contracts. As reported by The Wall Street Journal, his companies—Mina Corp. and Red Star Enterprises—supplied aviation fuel to the U.S. military at Manas Air Base in Kyrgyzstan, a strategic transit point for operations in Afghanistan. But by 2010, the deals began drawing unwanted attention from U.S. lawmakers.

A congressional subcommittee on national security launched an inquiry into the contracts, suspecting that the Defense Department may have overlooked potential irregularities in its desperation to secure critical fuel supplies, as per the information in The Wall Street Journal reported. When committee staff questioned the companies’ attorney, the response was cryptic and defiant: the companies would rather abandon their multibillion-dollar contracts than publicly reveal their true ownership structure.

A December 2010 congressional report titled “Mystery at Manas” concluded that the Pentagon had failed to properly vet the arrangements and revealed that Edelman co-owned the fuel contractors via trusts in Le Dain’s name. The committee noted that ownership was “buried under several layers of straw ownership in jurisdictions known for their corporate secrecy.” Though the committee found no direct evidence of corruption, it cited widespread suspicions that the contracts had fueled political instability in Kyrgyzstan—contributing to two revolutions in 2005 and 2010.

 

Following the congressional investigation, friends noticed a change in Edelman. Once known for his charm and accessibility, he became elusive and guarded. As The Wall Street Journal report described, he started using ghost email addresses and insisted on arranging phone calls by text. He even warned family members back in the U.S. not to post photos of him online.

In a May 2010 email to his accountant, Edelman declared his intention to erase his presence from public and financial records: “Basically I want and need my name OFF of everything…”

The restructuring that followed was orchestrated with the help of prestigious London law firm Mishcon de Reya. The family also converted wealth into tangible assets—a ski chalet in Austria, luxury yachts moored in Ibiza, and art collections.

A 2012 email to a business partner revealed Edelman’s philosophy on control: “A man is wise to deal with his finances in his own way with talking to women. Delphine really never had a clue abt what I earned or didn’t and even sometimes what I did… She just has to abide.”

By 2015, Edelman sought to preempt potential prosecution by joining the IRS’s voluntary disclosure program, aimed at encouraging Americans with undeclared offshore accounts to come forward. He submitted eight years’ worth of back tax returns, claiming annual earnings never exceeding $1 million and disclosing only one foreign bank account to the Treasury.

But as The Wall Street Journal reported, someone close to Edelman provided a very different story to the IRS. Tensions within his circle were beginning to show. Among his many business associates, some felt cheated or left out of deals. One former close friend and business partner—who co-owned the Austrian ski chalet—filed a civil lawsuit in 2020, accusing Edelman of violating partnership agreements and disguising ownership of assets through Le Dain. The matter was later settled privately.

What started as a complex private fortune has now become a high-profile test case in international tax enforcement. U.S. prosecutors allege Edelman and Le Dain hid more than $350 million in income through deceitful filings and sophisticated trust arrangements. With an estimated $129 million in unpaid taxes at stake, Edelman faces a possible decade or more behind bars.

The unraveling of Edelman’s carefully constructed financial world began to accelerate in 2020, when British authorities, acting on intelligence from U.S. tax investigators, conducted sweeping raids on Edelman’s properties. As The Wall Street Journal reported, police raided his Mayfair office, his palatial double mansion in London, and the home of his longtime London accountant. The operation was part of a growing investigation that had extended beyond the IRS to include the U.K. tax authorities and three other nations, all operating under the umbrella of the Joint Chiefs of Global Tax Enforcement (J5)—a coalition of elite tax enforcement agencies united to combat cross-border financial crimes.

Thousands of emails, financial documents, and even audio recordings were collected in the international sting, as investigators began to stitch together the full scope of Edelman’s operations.

As pressure mounted, Edelman tried to consolidate. According to the U.S. indictment, he sold his stake in the fuel-supply companies—Mina Corp. and Red Star Enterprises—to his Kyrgyz business partner for $40 million. Yet, on his 2020 U.S. tax return, he reported only $455,508 in income, a discrepancy prosecutors now cite as critical evidence of concealment.

The family also sold their prized London mansion to a wealthy Russian couple for $38 million, as they began to rotate between luxury residences in Verbier, Switzerland, and Comporta, Portugal. But Le Dain, increasingly distanced from the financial chaos, preferred their art-filled retreat in Ibiza, adorned with works by infamous art forger Elmyr de Hory, who had once lived on the island.

The legal noose continued to tighten. In 2022 and 2023, the U.S. Department of Justice secured guilty pleas and cooperation agreements from five Americans who had worked closely with Edelman—each of whom had their own tax troubles and motivations to trade testimony for leniency, as The Wall Street Journal report indicated.

Behind the scenes, Edelman remained defiant. In May 2024, he messaged a former business partner—one he had advised years earlier—lamenting what he saw as prosecutorial overreach: “Hard to believe the power behind a govt and constitution that supposedly provided rights instead of fear and forgot about innocence until proven guilty… destroying countless lives in the meantime.”

But what Edelman did not yet know was that two weeks earlier, a federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., had formally indicted him and Le Dain in a sealed document. The Wall Stret Journal reported that the charges included conspiracy to defraud the United States, tax evasion, false statements, and violations of foreign bank account reporting requirements. Soon after, Interpol issued a notice for his arrest.

After his extradition from Spain, Edelman had been granted house arrest in a high-rise condo in Alexandria, Virginia. But his own actions would undermine that leniency.

As detailed in the report in The Wall Street Journal, Edelman began exchanging personal text messages with two potential witnesses in his case—both of whom were alleged co-conspirators and now cooperating with prosecutors. One of them, the same friend with the Irish passport who had once helped him relocate funds to Singapore and the Bahamas, was preparing to testify under a plea agreement. Their conversations, while partly personal, drifted toward financial matters, including shared investments and utility payments for the Ibiza home.

Though Edelman insisted he was simply lonely and seeking human connection, lawyers for the witnesses reported the contact. At a subsequent bail hearing, Edelman told the judge: “I apologize. I think I was lonely.” His bail was promptly revoked, and he was returned to jail.

Back in France, Le Dain—who had chosen not to accompany her husband to the U.S.—was struggling to maintain control of the family’s remaining assets. Now officially a fugitive, she was reportedly having difficulty getting responses from the Swiss handlers of the family trust, as reported by The Wall Street Journal. Much of the liquidity from the London property sale had already been depleted by mortgage payments and Edelman’s spiraling legal fees.

Conflicted and isolated, Le Dain was reportedly unable to decide whether to turn herself in or continue evading prosecution. According to individuals familiar with the case, she expressed frustration over dwindling resources and the strain on their once-glamorous life.

 

Edelman, too, expressed a sense of emotional and familial unraveling. In a text to one of the witnesses, he wrote: “Del so alone and says no one to look after house and is giving Charlie away even. That’s the worst.”

The family dog, Charlie, it seemed, had become yet another casualty of a life once built on power, privilege, and illusion.

Edelman’s trial is now scheduled to begin in October, though The Wall Street Journal report noted that plea negotiations remain ongoing. Whether Edelman seeks a settlement or faces a full trial, the implications of his case are far-reaching.

Beyond the personal saga of a fallen tycoon, Edelman’s prosecution is a landmark in the global crackdown on offshore tax evasion. It showcases the increasing sophistication of international cooperation through organizations like the J5, and it highlights the enduring tensions surrounding America’s unusual system of citizenship-based taxation—a system that Edelman, for years, believed he could outmaneuver.

Now, as federal prosecutors prepare to present their case, Douglas Edelman must confront the reality that no amount of shell companies, aristocratic connections, or Swiss accounts can shield him from the consequences of a system determined to pursue what it sees as justice—across borders, across years, and across the arc of one man’s rise and fall.

Jimmy Kimmel Justifies Tesla Terrorism, Spreads False Nazi Claims

By Alana Mastrangelo (Breitbart)

ABC’s Jimmy Kimmel Live! host Jimmy Kimmel seemingly justified the recent string of vandalism and arson attacks against Elon Musk’s Tesla dealerships and vehicles across the country while spreading a debunked Nazi salute hoax. “Poor guy,” Kimmel sarcastically said of Musk and his company facing attacks, adding, “You do one, maybe two, Nazi salutes, everybody gets all bent out of shape.”

“Someone lit a bunch of Teslas on fire,” Kimmel said during his monologue. “And here’s the thing, I get that people are upset, [but] burning a car might not be great for the environment. I don’t think that’s what they had in mind when they invented the electric car.”

“In Las Vegas yesterday, someone threw a Molotov cocktail at a Tesla service center, at least five Teslas blew up. One from the Molotov, and four because that’s just what Teslas do sometimes,” the Jimmy Kimmel Live! host joked.

“And no one should be setting fires. You could kill somebody, you could hurt somebody. Elon Musk might not care about other people, but decent Americans should,” Kimmel continued.

The nighttime television host went on to claim, “The world’s richest man, again, has been trying to drum up sympathy for himself lately. His sales are down, his stock is down.”

“Last night he was somber as he went through this with Sean Hannity,” Kimmel added, before sharing a clip from an interview Musk had with Fox News, in which the SpaceX CEO said, in part, the following:

Tesla is a peaceful company. We’ve never done anything awful. I’ve never done anything awful. I’ve only done productive things. So, I think we just have a deranged — there’s some kind of mental illness thing going on here, because this doesn’t make any sense.

“Well, let me see if I can explain it for you. When you pull out a chainsaw to celebrate firing thousands of people, they get mad,” Kimmel said in reaction to Musk’s remarks.

Watch Below:

Notably, Kimmel was referring to Musk having been given a chainsaw by Argentina’s President Javier Milei during last month’s Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), to symbolize the slashing of wasteful government spending.

“My God, this poor guy, you do one, maybe two, Nazi salutes, everybody gets all bent out of shape,” Kimmel added, spreading the false claim that Musk performed Nazi salute in January while celebrating President Donald Trump’s second inauguration.

As Breitbart News reported, corporate media accused the tech tycoon of doing a “Nazi salute” during a Trump event at Capital One Arena in Washington, D.C., in January.

This claim is false. Musk first slapped his heart, extended his arm, and explained the gesture by saying, “My heart goes out to you.” Notably, even the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has conceded that while the moment was “awkward,” it was not malevolent.

Nevertheless, Kimmel’s recent attack against Musk appear to be the TV host doubling down on his comments from Tuesday, when he noted Tesla stock took a hit amid a string of vandalism blitzes against the company, and then advised his viewers — in a dry, sarcastic tone — not to further engage in Tesla vandalism, before pausing long enough to elicit laughter from audience members.

“Vandalizing Tesla vehicles, new Tesla vehicles? Please, don’t ever vandalize Tesla vehicles,” Kimmel quipped, before pausing to stare into the camera.

Jimmy Kimmel Live! audience members then burst into laughter, at which point the TV host proceeded with his monologue, uttering, “And, so, uh…”

Watch Below:

Alana Mastrangelo is a reporter for Breitbart News. You can follow her on Facebook and X at @ARmastrangelo, and on Instagram.

Israel threatens to annex parts of Gaza unless Hamas frees hostages

ISraeli Minister of Foreign Affairs Israel Katz arrives at the weekly Cabinet meeting in Jerusalem, Jan. 22, 2023. Photo by Olivier Fitoussi/Flash90.

“If the Hamas terror organization continues to refuse to release the captives, I instructed the IDF to capture additional areas, evacuate the population and expand the security zone around Gaza for the protection of Israeli communities through a permanent hold of the area,” according to a statement by Katz’s office.

“As long as Hamas continues its refusal, it will lose more and more land to Israel,” he added.

Katz also said that the IDF will “intensify” its military campaign in Gaza “through the expansion of the ground maneuver until the hostages are released and Hamas is defeated.”

Israel will use “all military and civilian pressure” to achieve its goals, including the “implementation of U.S President Donald Trump’s voluntary migration plan for Gaza residents,” concluded Katz.

The warning comes after the IDF on Thursday began conducting ground operations to dismantle terror infrastructure in southern Gaza’s Rafah. Simultaneously, troops continued ground activity in the northern and central Strip, as the Israeli Air Force struck terrorists and their assets across the enclave.

Early on Tuesday morning, the IDF launched “extensive” strikes against Hamas terrorist targets in the Gaza Strip. The renewed Israeli military campaign has been officially named “Operation Strength and Sword.”

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s office said the military was acting after Hamas terrorists rebuffed several proposals by U.S. Middle East envoy Steven Witkoff to extend the first phase of the Gaza truce through Ramadan and Passover.

Netanyahu said on Tuesday that Hamas has “already felt our strength” since the military returned to fighting, warning that future ceasefire negotiations with the terror group “will only take place under fire.”

On Wednesday, Katz warned Gazans of “total destruction.”

“If all the Israeli hostages are not released and Hamas is not removed from Gaza, Israel will act with forces you have never encountered before,” said the defense minister.

“Take the advice of the U.S. president. Return the hostages, remove Hamas and other options will be open to you— including leaving to other places in the world for those who wish.

“The alternative is total destruction and devastation,” vowed Katz.