64.8 F
New York

tjvnews.com

Friday, May 16, 2025
CLASSIFIED ADS
LEGAL NOTICE
DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
Home Blog Page 3

Trump Announces $200B Boeing Deal with Qatar Airways, Reinforcing U.S. Manufacturing Amid Rising Foreign Policy Stakes

Trump Announces $200B Boeing Deal with Qatar Airways, Reinforcing U.S. Manufacturing Amid Rising Foreign Policy Stakes

By: Fern Sidman

In a bold move that merges diplomacy with industrial revival, President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday a sweeping $200 billion agreement between Qatar Airways and Boeing, marking what TIME.com described as one of the most significant commercial deals of his presidency. The announcement, made in Doha during Trump’s high-profile tour of the Middle East, centers on Qatar Airways’ purchase of 160 Boeing jets—a decisive boost for the American aerospace giant, which has faced escalating turbulence in recent years.

“It’s over $200 billion, but 160 in terms of the jets. That’s fantastic,” Trump declared at the signing ceremony, flanked by Qatar’s Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al-Thani and Boeing CEO Kelly Ortberg. The report on Wednesday at TIME.com emphasized the dual symbolism of the event: a win for domestic manufacturing and a visible deepening of U.S.-Qatar relations at a time when the Gulf nation has taken center stage in Trump’s evolving Middle East policy.

For Boeing, the Qatar Airways agreement represents a much-needed resurgence. As the report at TIME.com noted, the company’s order backlog had been eviscerated over the last 24 months. A cascade of crises—including the Alaska Airlines 737 Max door plug failure and a prolonged machinists’ strike—had cut orders by 60% and significantly disrupted production. The deal offers a pivotal turnaround, though it comes against the backdrop of Trump’s aggressive tariff strategy, which risks inflating the cost of American-made aircraft and dampening foreign interest.

Yet for now, the deal delivers a lifeline. “This is not just about planes. This is about jobs—thousands of American jobs,” Trump emphasized, echoing themes that have become a hallmark of his industrial policy.

As the TIME.com report repeatedly pointed out, the announcement also underscores Trump’s deeply personal investment in aviation, both symbolically and politically. A lifelong aircraft aficionado, Trump has used his own Boeing 757—nicknamed “Trump Force One”—as a high-flying emblem of success and power. The Qatar Airways announcement is only the latest example of how Trump’s passion for aviation blends with his transactional brand of geopolitics.

This convergence became even more apparent as Trump floated the controversial idea of accepting a $400 million Boeing 747-8 from Qatar—originally customized for a Qatari official—as a temporary Air Force One replacement. Trump praised the offer as a “gesture of goodwill” and a fiscally responsible alternative to commissioning a new aircraft. “Why should our military, and therefore our taxpayers, be forced to pay hundreds of millions of Dollars when they can get it for FREE from a country that wants to reward us for a job well done,” Trump posted on Truth Social.

The proposal has ignited a fierce debate in Washington. The TIME.com report indicated that national security officials have flagged potential vulnerabilities, particularly in adapting a foreign aircraft to the stringent security requirements of a U.S. presidential plane. Experts warn that any foreign-owned jet would need to undergo complete disassembly to detect and neutralize hidden espionage devices. NBC News reported that the overhaul could cost upwards of $1 billion and take several years to meet U.S. military specifications.

Beyond logistical challenges, Trump’s proposed acceptance of the Qatari aircraft has raised constitutional red flags. Legal experts and lawmakers, as cited by TIME.com, have pointed to the Emoluments Clause, which prohibits federal officials from accepting gifts from foreign governments without the consent of Congress. Democrats have already begun drafting inquiries into the matter, suggesting that what Trump calls a “gesture of goodwill” could, in legal terms, be interpreted as an unconstitutional gift.

Nevertheless, Trump has remained steadfast, portraying the aircraft as both a symbol of diplomatic respect and a practical solution to the aging fleet currently in use. “It’s a big win for everyone,” Trump told reporters in Doha. “It shows that America is back, and we are respected again.”

The Qatar Airways deal is not an isolated event but rather part of a broader export push woven throughout Trump’s Middle East tour. As the TIME.com report detailed, the President has overseen a flurry of trade announcements across the region. Just one day before the Qatar deal, Boeing signed a $4.8 billion agreement with Saudi Arabia’s sovereign wealth fund. That was followed by a $10 billion purchase from a British airline, confirmed by Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.

These high-stakes commercial victories align with Trump’s “America First” economic agenda, casting the president not only as commander-in-chief but also as chief salesman for U.S. industry. As TIME.com report aptly noted, the Doha ceremony captured the essence of the Trump presidency: “a fusion of commerce, charisma, and calculated geopolitical theater.”

The Qatar Airways-Boeing deal shines a proverbial spotlight on the transactional yet strategically ambitious ethos of Trump’s foreign policy. It strengthens a key diplomatic relationship, revitalizes a struggling American industry, and puts Trump back in his element—closing deals on the global stage. But it also raises profound questions about legality, security, and the boundaries between personal brand-building and national interest.

Such high-visibility wins may bolster Trump’s image as a dealmaker. But whether these deals endure public scrutiny and congressional oversight remains to be seen.

 

 

Quentin Tarantino Steals Spotlight at Cannes with Glamorous Israeli Wife Amid Star-Studded Premiere & Rising Global Film Tensions

Quentin Tarantino Steals Spotlight at Cannes with Glamorous Israeli Wife Amid Star-Studded Premiere & Rising Global Film Tensions

By: Russ Spencer

Acclaimed director Quentin Tarantino and his stunning Israeli wife Daniella Pick turned heads and warmed hearts on the red carpet of the 2024 Cannes Film Festival, where the legendary filmmaker attended as guest of honor during Tuesday’s opening night. As reported by The Daily Mail of the UK, Tarantino, 62, packed on the PDA with his glamorous wife as they arrived at the glittering premiere of Leave One Day, which also served as the festival’s official opening ceremony.

Tarantino—celebrated for cinematic masterpieces such as Pulp Fiction and Inglourious Basterds—was in Cannes not to unveil a new feature, but to pay tribute to legendary Western director George Sherman. According to the information provided in The Daily Mail report, he will also present Sherman’s rarely screened classics Le Mustang Noir (1949) and Sur le territoire des Comanches (1950), followed by an in-depth conversation with renowned critic Elvis Mitchell.

Standing beside her husband, Daniella Pick stunned in a shimmering silver sequined gown, evoking vintage Hollywood glamour. The couple, who met in 2009 during Tarantino’s promotional tour of Inglourious Basterds in Israel and wed in 2018, share two young children—five-year-old son Leo and a two-year-old daughter, whose name they have not publicly revealed, according to The Daily Mail report. Their affectionate display on the Croisette delighted photographers and drew attention to the increasingly personal dimension of Tarantino’s public appearances in recent years.

As The Daily Mail report highlighted, Tarantino has shifted his priorities in recent years, placing family life ahead of film production. During a discussion at the Sundance Film Festival in January, he told Elvis Mitchell, “When I’m in America, I’m writing. When I’m in Israel, I’m an abba,” referencing the Hebrew word for “father.” He added that he doesn’t plan to begin production on his final film until his son is old enough to remember the experience.

“I kind of want to not do whatever movie I end up doing until my son is at least six,” Tarantino said. “That way he’ll know what’s going on, he’ll be there, and it will be a memory for the rest of his life.”

As Cannes rolled out its famed red carpet, international politics cast a looming shadow over the cinematic celebration. As The Daily Mail reported, the festival is taking place in the wake of President Donald Trump’s vow to impose 100% tariffs on all films “produced in Foreign Lands.” The White House has since clarified that it is exploring alternatives, such as offering incentives for U.S.-based productions, but the threat of tariffs has rattled the international film community.

The Cannes Film Festival, often dubbed the Olympics of world cinema, was originally founded during World War II as a defiant response to the fascist-controlled Venice Film Festival. The Daily Mail reported that over the decades, it has stood as a beacon of artistic expression and global cooperation. This year, filmmakers from around the world are once again gathering not only to celebrate cinema but also to navigate uncertain political waters.

Directors such as Brazilian auteur Kleber Mendonça Filho (The Secret Agent) and Cannes veterans like Robert De Niro and Tom Cruise are all expected to feature prominently in the festival’s lineup. The report in The Daily Mail also noted that first-time filmmakers Kristen Stewart, Scarlett Johansson, and Harris Dickinson will debut their directorial efforts in the Un Certain Regard sidebar—underscoring the festival’s commitment to new voices.

Meanwhile, Johansson’s debut film Eleanor the Great is scheduled for a May 20 premiere. Cruise’s Mission: Impossible – The Final Reckoning, one of the most anticipated blockbusters, takes its turn on the red carpet on May 14.

Amid the cinematic glitz, however, Cannes organizers are also cracking down on the controversial trend of “naked dresses.” New modesty rules explicitly ban nudity on the red carpet or within any festival area. “For decency reasons, nudity is prohibited,” reads the official Cannes directive, as quoted by The Daily Mail. “The festival welcoming teams will be obligated to prohibit red carpet access to anyone not respecting these rules.”

Despite the political undertones and heightened scrutiny of attire, Tarantino’s presence at Cannes remains a nostalgic high point. With his storied career potentially nearing its conclusion—his next film is said to be his last—fans and colleagues alike are savoring his contributions to cinema.

In honoring George Sherman and embracing his role as a family man, Tarantino demonstrated that while he may be stepping away from the director’s chair, his impact on the world stage remains as potent as ever. And as The Daily Mail keenly observed, this year’s Cannes is not only a celebration of cinema—but a reflection of how art, politics, and personal legacy now coexist under the spotlight.

Netanyahu Blasts Macron for “Standing with Hamas,” Escalating Diplomatic Rift Over Gaza War

Netanyahu Blasts Macron for “Standing with Hamas,” Escalating Diplomatic Rift Over Gaza War

By: Fern Sidman

In a fierce and unusually direct rebuke, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu lashed out at French President Emmanuel Macron on Wednesday, accusing him of siding with Hamas and echoing “blood libels” against Israel. As reported by VIN News, the diplomatic clash marks a significant deterioration in Franco-Israeli relations amid the intensifying war in Gaza.

The sharp response from Jerusalem followed a televised interview in which Macron harshly criticized Israel’s ongoing military campaign against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, describing the humanitarian situation as “unacceptable” and placing direct blame on Netanyahu’s government. “What the government of Benjamin Netanyahu is doing is unacceptable… There is no water, no medicine, the wounded cannot get out, the doctors cannot get in. What he is doing is shameful,” Macron told French broadcaster TF1.

Netanyahu’s office fired back with a blistering statement reported by VIN News, accusing Macron of aligning with a terrorist organization and spreading anti-Israel falsehoods. “Macron has once again chosen to stand with a murderous Islamist terrorist organization and echo its despicable propaganda, accusing Israel of blood libels,” the statement read. “Israel is engaged in a multi-front war for its very existence following the horrific massacre committed by Hamas against innocent people on October 7, including the murder and kidnapping of dozens of French nationals.”

The Israeli statement emphasized that Macron, instead of backing a fellow Western democracy under siege by radical Islamists, is “once again demanding that Israel surrender and reward terrorism.” The prime minister’s office reiterated that Israel “will not stop and will not surrender” in its fight to defeat Hamas. Netanyahu remains committed, according to the information provided in the VIN News report, to the war’s objectives: dismantling Hamas’s military and governing infrastructure, securing the release of all hostages, and ensuring that Gaza can never again threaten Israel’s safety.

Tensions have been simmering between Paris and Jerusalem since the beginning of the current war, but Macron’s latest remarks may have crossed a new diplomatic threshold. The French president not only condemned Israeli military actions, but also raised the possibility of revisiting European Union cooperation agreements with Israel—a move that could have broad political and economic implications.

“I got angry,” Macron admitted in the TF1 interview, saying he had “tough words” with Netanyahu and accused Israel of blocking humanitarian aid. “All the aid that France and other countries deliver is blocked by the Israelis,” Macron said, referencing his visit to the Rafah border crossing between Egypt and Gaza. The report at VIN News noted that while Macron stopped short of labeling the crisis a genocide—saying that was “for historians to decide”—he declared it “the most serious humanitarian crisis” since the October 7 Hamas onslaught.

Israel has rejected Macron’s claims about the aid blockade, arguing that Hamas is deliberately obstructing humanitarian efforts and manipulating the situation for propaganda purposes. Israeli officials have also stressed that they are working in coordination with Egypt and international organizations to increase aid flow while maintaining necessary security protocols to prevent weapons smuggling.

Macron’s comments, as cited in the VIN News report, also reflected a strategic calculation about U.S. influence over Israel. “We need the United States. President (Donald) Trump has the levers,” Macron said, adding that Israel depends on American military assistance rather than European support.

Macron’s warning of potential diplomatic consequences was not lost on observers. “My job is to do everything I can to make it stop,” he said, referencing the ongoing war. “There will be consequences if this continues.” He also hinted at leveraging France’s position in the EU to influence Israeli policy more forcefully.

The unusually hostile exchange between two heads of state—especially given France’s historical ties to Israel—has alarmed many in the Jewish community and among Israel’s allies. As the VIN News report emphasized, the rift raises broader concerns about Europe’s shifting stance toward the conflict, and whether some Western leaders may be caving to public pressure at the expense of moral clarity in the fight against terrorism.

At a time when Israel is waging what it views as an existential war, Netanyahu’s message to Macron—and to the world—is unequivocal: “Israel will continue to fight until its objectives are achieved. We will never apologize for defending ourselves.”

 

 

 

DOJ Intervenes in Hunter College Lawsuit, Backs Jewish Professor’s Antisemitism Claims

By: Fern Sidman

In a major development that could reshape how universities address antisemitism, the U.S. Department of Justice has formally intervened in a civil rights lawsuit brought by Professor Leah Garrett against Hunter College, lending significant weight to allegations that the CUNY institution failed to protect her from a hostile environment fueled by antisemitic protests. As reported by VIN News, the case is emerging as a high-profile test of the federal government’s commitment to combating Jew-hatred on American campuses.

Professor Garrett, who heads the Jewish Studies Center at Hunter College, filed her federal lawsuit late last year. According to her complaint, she endured persistent harassment in the wake of Hamas’s October 7 massacre in Israel. The complaint describes a campus environment where antisemitic imagery—such as bloody Stars of David and vandalized posters of Israeli hostages—was routinely displayed by protestors. Despite her repeated requests for the university to remove these incendiary materials, Garrett claims Hunter officials refused, citing administrative delays and bureaucratic red tape.

Now, the Justice Department has weighed in, directly challenging the school’s defense that such displays were protected under the First Amendment. In its recent court filing, the DOJ argued that constitutional protections for speech cannot override federal civil rights laws designed to ensure safe, non-hostile educational and professional environments. As the VIN News report noted, the DOJ emphasized that under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, publicly funded schools have a legal obligation to address and remedy any behavior that creates a hostile atmosphere for students or staff based on race, religion, or national origin.

“The First Amendment does not immunize a federally funded university from liability when it fails to respond to discriminatory harassment,” the DOJ stated—marking a rare and pointed intervention by the federal government in a university-level civil rights dispute.

Brooke Goldstein, founder and executive director of The Lawfare Project, which is representing Professor Garrett, welcomed the DOJ’s involvement. In a statement shared with VIN News, Goldstein called the move “a critical step toward holding public institutions accountable for enabling antisemitism to fester unchallenged.” She added that the DOJ’s filing affirms what Jewish students and faculty have been saying for months: that antisemitic harassment is not merely offensive speech, but a violation of federal law when it creates a toxic learning or work environment.

Hunter College responded with a brief statement expressing its commitment to a “safe and inclusive campus,” but declined to comment further, citing the ongoing nature of the litigation. Still, the growing attention on the case has placed the Manhattan-based CUNY school under intense scrutiny, especially as other CUNY campuses have faced similar controversies over their handling of antisemitic incidents.

This lawsuit is not unfolding in isolation. As VIN News has reported extensively, the Trump administration has made tackling antisemitism on college campuses a key priority. In recent months, federal officials have pulled hundreds of millions of dollars in funding from prestigious institutions such as Harvard University and Columbia University, following investigations into their failure to protect Jewish students from targeted hate during pro-Hamas campus demonstrations.

In addition, the administration has signaled its willingness to take even more aggressive measures, including the possible revocation of visas for foreign students involved in unlawful or disruptive protests that cross into intimidation or hate speech.

Professor Garrett’s case could set a crucial precedent. Should the court find that Hunter College’s inaction constituted a violation of civil rights law, universities nationwide may be forced to reevaluate their responses to rising antisemitism, the VIN News report explained. Many Jewish students and faculty say the climate on campuses has drastically worsened since October 7, with administrators frequently reluctant to take meaningful action for fear of backlash or accusations of stifling political speech.

One thing is clear: the federal government’s involvement in Garrett’s case has raised the stakes for universities across the country. With the DOJ now firmly asserting that antisemitism cannot hide behind free speech claims, higher education institutions may soon be held to a much higher standard of accountability.

Palestinian-Syrian Migrant Who Carried Out 2018 Knife Rampage Investigated Again for Stabbing Jewish Man in Dutch Clinic

(TJV NEWS)  A Palestinian-Syrian migrant previously responsible for a brutal knife attack in The Hague is now under renewed criminal investigation in the Netherlands after allegedly stabbing a Jewish man in the neck — an act authorities are treating as attempted murder with a terrorist motive. The details were reported by De Telegraaf, which cited sources close to the investigation.

The suspect, identified as Malek F., carried out the attack on April 6 within the recreation area of the Mesdag TBS clinic in Groningen, where he was undergoing mandatory psychiatric treatment. According to De Telegraaf, F. approached the victim from behind and inflicted a deep neck wound, eerily resembling his violent behavior during a 2018 stabbing spree.

The Dutch Public Prosecution Service confirmed to De Telegraaf that F. was arrested later that same day. A spokesperson said, “We suspect him of attempted murder with a terrorist intent. The reason we have only arrested him now is because of the investigation and the condition of the suspect.”

This latest incident has revived concerns about F.’s continued presence in the Netherlands and the handling of high-risk psychiatric offenders. In 2018, F. stabbed three individuals at random in The Hague, nearly severing one victim’s neck. Witnesses said he shouted “Allahu Akbar” during the rampage and later referred to the attack as jihad in prison conversations. He also made the Tawhid gesture (pointing upward) when confronted by police.

Despite prosecutors pushing for a 15-year prison sentence along with TBS psychiatric detention, a Dutch court ruled that F. was not criminally responsible due to psychosis and sentenced him solely to TBS. The appeals court maintained that a terrorist motive had not been proven beyond reasonable doubt. Nonetheless, mental health experts repeatedly warned of a high risk of relapse under stress.

Following that sentencing, F. was granted multiple unaccompanied leaves and was reportedly preparing to live independently later this year. After the April 6 stabbing, those privileges were immediately revoked. The Dutch immigration service (IND) told De Telegraaf that it is now considering revoking his residency permit.

The Jewish victim survived the attack and remains under medical care. Victims of F.’s earlier attacks, who had been kept updated on his rehabilitation, expressed outrage over the latest incident and criticized authorities for granting him increased freedoms.

Geert Wilders, leader of the PVV party, responded to the incident on X (formerly Twitter), stating: “Islam does not belong in the Netherlands. Neither do radical Muslims.”

The victim received hospital care and continues to receive support. Authorities have urged anyone who may recognize the suspect from the released footage to come forward.

MEF Report Uncovers $40 Billion Qatari Spending Spree

The Qatari government has invested across U.S. financial sectors, from businesses and lobby firms, to think tanks, universities, and K-12 education .Shutterstock

The Middle East Forum’s (MEF) latest report, “America for Sale: Qatar’s $40 Billion Spending Spree Buys Influence and Control of Elite Institutions,” exposes Qatari government investments across U.S. financial sectors, from businesses and lobby firms, to think tanks, universities, and K-12 education. The New York Sun calls MEF’s study “a highly detailed look at Qatar’s enormous influence campaign, in which the tiny kingdom has deployed its enormous natural gas and oil wealth to win America’s approbation.”

Marking the first attempt to empirically quantify Qatar’s strategic investments in the U.S. marketplace, “America for Sale” presents a comprehensive picture of the Gulf emirate’s use of petrodollars to purchase political influence and shape global opinion.

Doha’s investments include billions in critical infrastructure, including crude oil and liquified natural gas (LNG) exports, even though Qatar is America’s chief competitor in global LNG sales. As the U.S. seeks energy independence from the Middle East, American companies are outsourcing control of the U.S. power grid and green energy products to Qatar.

Strategic moves include investments in artificial intelligence and advanced technologies, which represent a threat to U.S. national security interests and Americans’ privacy data. In real estate, the Gulf emirate’s ventures include more than $6 billion in Manhattan trophy properties, even as New York legislators seek to impose foreign ownership restrictions.

“America for Sale” discloses over $71 million in lobbying and public relations expenses targeting K Street powerhouses, including contracts with former Congress members, legislative staff, and campaign managers from both sides of the aisle.

Ignoring post-October 7 objections to its $6.3 billion in gifts to American colleges, the report shows Qatar donated record sums to institutions of higher learning. Simultaneously, Qatar Foundation International invested millions in K-12 classrooms. Doha’s funding of respected think tanks, such as the Brookings Institute and RAND Corporation, undermines their objectivity and independence.

“It’s time for American policymakers to accept that Qatar is a foreign adversary not unlike Iran, China, and North Korea,” said Benjamin Baird, director of MEF Action and the report’s author. “We must strike a balance between growing our economy and outsourcing control of our critical infrastructure and advanced technologies to foreign adversaries.”

“Qatar’s $40 billion infiltration is a direct threat to American values and security,” said Gregg Roman, MEF’s executive director. “Let’s end the foreign payoffs, protect our national security, and stop the soft power Trojan horse in its tracks.”


The Middle East Forum, a non-profit organization founded in 1994 by Daniel Pipes, promotes American interests and Western values in the Middle East. MEF accomplishes its mission through intellectual and activist efforts. For more information, visit www.meforum.org.

Report Reveals Secret Western Intelligence Network Aided Mossad in Post-Munich Killings

By: Jerome Brookshire

A newly uncovered cache of declassified documents has unveiled a covert network of Western intelligence agencies that supplied critical support to Israel’s Mossad in executing a decades-long campaign of targeted assassinations following the 1972 Munich massacre. As reported by The Guardian (UK), this previously unknown collaboration—conducted with no parliamentary oversight or public knowledge—enabled Israel to eliminate Palestinian operatives across Europe, raising significant ethical, legal, and political questions.

According to The Guardian, the clandestine effort emerged through a secret communication channel known as “Kilowatt,” established in 1971. The system allowed 18 intelligence agencies—including those of the U.S., UK, France, West Germany, Switzerland, and Italy—to share raw intelligence with each other and with Mossad. The timing of this intelligence-sharing was pivotal: it occurred just months before the massacre of 11 Israeli athletes by Palestinian terrorists from the Black September Organization (BSO) at the Munich Olympic Games.

Following Munich, Mossad launched what became known as Operation Wrath of God, a targeted campaign to hunt down and eliminate individuals linked to the attack and to other assaults against Israeli interests. Though the mission inspired Steven Spielberg’s 2005 film Munich, the real-world operations were far more complex and, as the report in The Guardian noted, benefited from significant international cooperation.

Dr. Aviva Guttmann, a historian at Aberystwyth University, discovered encrypted Kilowatt cables in Swiss archives, providing the first definitive evidence of foreign intelligence contributions to Israel’s assassination campaign. As The Guardian report explained, these cables contained a wealth of granular information, including the identities of terrorists, their travel routes, safe houses, vehicles, and even details of previous attacks.

According to Guttmann, “They were even sharing the results of their own investigations into the assassinations with the agency – Mossad – which was most likely to have done them.” Her research, cited extensively in The Guardian report, confirmed that Western intelligence services not only provided the foundation for many Mossad operations but also analyzed the aftermath of killings likely executed by Israel.

Her work is set to be published in a forthcoming book that will likely provoke renewed debate about the ethical boundaries of covert alliances.

One of the earliest casualties of this campaign was Wael Zwaiter, a Palestinian intellectual working for the Libyan embassy in Rome. He was gunned down in the lobby of his apartment building weeks after Munich. Although defenders long claimed Zwaiter was innocent, Kilowatt cables cited by The Guardian show that Western agencies had repeatedly identified him as an arms supplier for the BSO.

Another target, Mahmoud al-Hamshari, the PLO’s representative in France, was assassinated in Paris in December 1972. The Kilowatt records described him not only as a diplomat but also as someone who allegedly recruited and funded terrorist cells—again, information passed along to Mossad.

A more explosive revelation comes from the June 1973 killing of Mohamed Boudia, a seasoned operator with ties to the PFLP and BSO. The Guardian reported that Swiss authorities played a direct role in facilitating Mossad’s successful strike on Boudia, who had orchestrated a string of violent plots, including attempted bombings in Israel and attacks on Jewish émigrés from the Soviet Union.

Speaking to The Guardian, Guttmann explained, “I’m not sure the Israeli [assassination] campaign would have been possible without the tactical information from the European intelligence services. Certainly, it was of huge benefit. But it was also very important for the Mossad to know that they had that tacit support.”

Golda Meir, Israel’s prime minister at the time, reportedly demanded solid proof before authorizing each hit. According to the report in The Guardian, much of that proof originated with Western allies via Kilowatt. This strategic partnership allowed Mossad to act swiftly and decisively, while Western agencies remained comfortably behind the curtain.

One of the most infamous missteps in Operation Wrath of God, as the campaign came to be known, also ties back to this network. In 1973, Mossad agents, relying on the only known image of BSO leader Ali Hassan Salameh—supplied by British MI5—mistakenly assassinated a Moroccan waiter in Lillehammer, Norway. The botched operation resulted in the arrest of several Israeli operatives and led Israeli Prime Minister Golda Meir to officially shut down the program. Nevertheless, The Guardian report noted, Western intelligence agencies quietly continued supplying Israel with actionable intelligence well after the official closure.

All of these assassinations were tied together through intelligence that flowed via the Kilowatt network—an intelligence-sharing system operating entirely in the shadows. As The Guardian report stressed, the existence of Kilowatt was kept hidden from legislative bodies, meaning no parliamentary or congressional oversight was exercised in decisions that led directly to lethal force on foreign soil.

The deeply collaborative nature of these operations remained unknown for decades. Now, as Guttmann revealed to The Guardian, even Israeli agents involved in the campaign were often unaware of the sources behind their targeting data. Yet the confidence in the information remained unshaken. “We just knew the intel was solid,” said one former Mossad operative.

Meanwhile, Palestinian operatives from the BSO and PFLP viewed the period as a tit-for-tat “war of the spooks.” Speaking to The Guardian in a previous interview, former members of Palestinian terrorist networks acknowledged that while Israel’s tactics were brutal and highly effective, they retaliated whenever possible. One Israeli agent was killed in Madrid; another was left seriously injured in Brussels. These bloody reprisals underscored the scale and intensity of the covert war playing out in European capitals.

The implications of these historical revelations are not confined to the past. Guttmann draws a direct line between the Kilowatt-era operations and present-day intelligence dynamics, especially in light of the ongoing conflict in Gaza. Following the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel—which left 1,200 Israelis dead and over 250 hostages taken—Israel launched an aggressive military response. According to the report in The Guardian, over 50,000 Palestinians have since been killed, the majority of whom are believed to be civilians.

“This history matters now more than ever,” Guttmann told The Guardian. “When it comes to intelligence-sharing between services of different states, oversight is very difficult. International relations of the secret state are completely off the radar of politicians, parliaments or the public. Even today there will be a lot of information being shared about which we know absolutely nothing.”

Recent Israeli operations bear striking resemblance to the past. Mossad is widely believed to have orchestrated the assassination of Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran last year, and Israeli forces have also eliminated top Hamas commanders in Gaza and Beirut. The past year has seen the systematic dismantling of Hezbollah’s leadership structure, with the killing of its veteran commander and other senior officials.

The revelations have prompted difficult questions about the ethical boundaries of intelligence work, particularly when it involves covert support for extrajudicial killings. While defenders argue that Mossad’s actions were retaliatory and defensive, critics see the Kilowatt revelations as evidence of systematic international complicity in state-sponsored assassination.

The full implications of this exposé, reported by The Guardian, continue to reverberate through the intelligence community, historical scholarship, and diplomatic circles alike.

Qatar: The Financial & Ideological Engine of Radical Islam and Global Anti-Semitism

By: Fern Sidman

Qatar, a small yet immensely wealthy Gulf nation, has strategically positioned itself as a major power broker in the Middle East while simultaneously serving as a key benefactor of radical Islamist movements, including Hamas. Despite maintaining strong diplomatic ties with the United States and other Western nations, Qatar has long played a double game—presenting itself as a modern, business-friendly state while funneling billions into extremist causes that promote anti-Semitism, jihadist ideology, and violent resistance against Israel.

The Dual Identity of Qatar: Western Ally or Islamist Powerhouse?

Qatar’s unique political strategy has allowed it to enjoy cordial relations with the U.S. and European nations while simultaneously becoming the primary financial and ideological patron of radical Islam. The country hosts a major U.S. military base, Al Udeid Air Base, which serves as a strategic hub for American operations in the Middle East. This relationship has provided Qatar with diplomatic protection, allowing it to evade significant repercussions for its well-documented sponsorship of extremist groups.

Yet behind this Western-friendly façade, Qatar is the world’s largest state sponsor of Hamas, the Iranian-backed terror organization responsible for the brutal massacre of 1200 Israeli and others on October 7, 2023 and the abduction of 251 others. Through its vast financial resources, Qatar funds Hamas’ military operations, sustains its governing apparatus in Gaza, and enables the group’s relentless propaganda campaigns against Israel.

Qatar’s Billions Fueling Anti-Semitism and Terrorism

Qatar’s financial support extends far beyond Hamas. The nation has emerged as a global epicenter of Islamist radicalization, with its billions funding networks that spread anti-Semitic hatred, incite violence against Jews, and glorify terrorism. These funds flow through a complex web of state-controlled charities, media outlets, and diplomatic deals that bolster extremists while shielding Qatar from international scrutiny.

One of the primary vehicles of Qatar’s radical influence is Al Jazeera, the state-controlled news network that has become a global propaganda machine promoting Islamist narratives, legitimizing terror groups, and spewing anti-Israel rhetoric. Through carefully crafted editorial policies, Al Jazeera manipulates public perception, portraying jihadists as freedom fighters and vilifying Israel as an oppressive, illegitimate state.

Additionally, Qatar’s vast donations to Western universities and think tanks have helped infiltrate academic institutions with pro-Islamist, anti-Israel ideologies. By funding academic programs, research centers, and faculty positions, Qatar has influenced discourse in elite universities, ensuring that narratives sympathetic to Hamas and other Islamist movements dominate intellectual circles.

The Arad Nir Interview: A Whitewashing of Qatar’s Role

Despite Qatar’s well-documented role in financing and legitimizing radical Islam, Western media outlets have often portrayed the Gulf nation in a flattering light. A prime example of this occurred when Channel 12 in Israel conducted what it dubbed a “historic interview” with Qatar’s Prime Minister. Israeli journalist Arad Nir, visibly deferential in the interview, went so far as to thank the Qatari leader for granting him the privilege of the discussion.

However, what was glaringly absent from the interview was any acknowledgment of Qatar’s central role in fostering anti-Semitism, incitement against Israel, and funding terrorism. Instead of confronting Qatar with its complicity in supporting Hamas and promoting radicalism, Nir’s approach seemed to grant legitimacy to a regime that actively works against the interests of Israel and the Jewish people.

Qatar: The “Malignant Tumor” of the Middle East

Erel Segal, a well-known Israeli commentator, has compared Qatar’s influence to the quarrelsome little redhead character from the children’s show Once Upon a Time—only, as he aptly puts it, Qatar has an unlimited supply of money to fund its mischief. But Qatar’s influence is far more sinister than a mischievous television character.

Qatar has been likened to a malignant tumor growing in the heart of the desert—not an aggressive cancer that kills quickly, but a slow-spreading, insidious disease that methodically eats away at its host. Unlike other extremist regimes that openly declare war on the West and Israel, Qatar has perfected the art of deception, infiltrating institutions, diplomacy, and global media with an agenda that normalizes radical Islam, funds anti-Semitic incitement, and systematically erodes opposition to terrorism.

The Urgent Need to Confront Qatar’s Duplicity

Qatar’s carefully curated image as a modern, progressive state has allowed it to evade international accountability for far too long. While it portrays itself as a mediator in conflicts and a host of major global events such as the FIFA World Cup, its true role as a leading sponsor of terror, anti-Semitism, and radicalization must be exposed.

The time has come for Western governments, media outlets, and international organizations to stop turning a blind eye to Qatar’s double game. Diplomatic ties and military partnerships must no longer be used as an excuse to ignore Qatar’s deep-rooted complicity in global Islamist extremism. As long as Qatar remains the engine fueling Hamas, promoting radical jihadist ideology, and spreading anti-Semitism, peace and stability in the Middle East—and beyond—will remain an elusive dream.

For more information on the extent to which Qatar funds American universities and shapes the ideological positions of future leaders, please read the following: https://tjvnews.com/2024/08/updated-version-examining-the-incessant-flow-of-qatari-money-into-american-academia-unintended-consequences-on-campus/

 

Trump meets with Syria’s president, calls for Israel peace deal

By David Rosenberg, World Israel News– with TJV Editor Notes

President Donald Trump met with Ahmed al-Sharaa – a former rebel leader (TJV NOTE: Al-Qaeda)  who now serves as President of Syria – during his visit to Saudi Arabia on Wednesday.

The two leaders met in Riyadh on Wednesday morning, during an economic summit hosted by the Saudi government.

The conservative publication National Review pointed out  the following:

Trump’s meeting with Ahmed al-Sharaa is even more extraordinary than an American president meeting with some repugnant branch of the Assad family. Until late December, the U.S. government was willing to pay $10 million for information about al-Sharaa’s location, because he was on the “specially designated global terrorist” list.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was also present during the meeting.

Trump met with al-Sharaa, who recently met with French President Emmanuel Macron in Paris, for roughly half an hour, marking the highest-level meeting ever between an American official and a Syrian leader.

TJV Noted, Washington has also been pressing Damascus to protect and respect religious minorities after recent mass killings of Alawites, Druze, and Christians, especially along the coast, in the south, and in some Damascus suburbs

Earlier in the summit, Trump had announced his plans to offer sanctions relief to Syria – a move Damascus has indicated it would be willing to make concessions for in order to achieve.

“I will be ordering the cessation of sanctions against Syria in order to give them a chance at greatness,” Trump announced Tuesday.

During the meeting on Wednesday, Trump pressed the Syrian leader to commit to normalizing relations with Israel as part of the Abraham Accords and instructing foreign terrorists and militia members aligned with foreign governments to leave the country.

Thousands of pro-Iranian terrorists, including members of the Lebanese Hezbollah group, operated in Syria prior to the fall of the Assad government, and many are believed to still be operating in the country.

At a meeting with Gulf leaders Wednesday, Trump confirmed that a Syrian-Israeli peace deal was on the table.

“We are currently exploring normalizing relations with Syria’s new government, as you know, beginning with my meeting with President Ahmed al-Sharaa.”

During his meet with al-Sharaa, Trump also urged Syria to deport all Palestinian terrorists present in the country, and cooperate with the U.S. in combating the Islamic State in Syria (ISIS) terror group.

Trump also urged Syria to assume control of ISIS detention centers in northeastern Syria, Trump said.

The meeting came after Trump called on Saudi Arabia to also normalize relations with Israel under the auspices of the Abraham Accords.

Bar-Ilan University Launches Annual Lecture Aiming to Strengthen Jewish Life and Identity

From left to right: Lorraine S. Cherrick, Jordan B. Cherrick, and Rachel M. Cherrick. The Cherrick family has endowed the new Adam Cherrick & Bernard Cherrick Memorial Lecture Series at Bar-Ilan University.

 

Edited by: Fern Sidman

In a landmark initiative blending academic excellence with a profound commitment to Jewish identity, American Friends of Bar-Ilan University announced on Tuesday, the creation of a new annual lecture series that seeks to leverage the power of Jewish Studies to strengthen and sustain Judaism in Israel and across the globe. The Adam Cherrick & Bernard Cherrick Memorial Lecture Series is being launched with an initial endowment of over $100,000 from Jordan B. and Lorraine S. Cherrick, together with their daughter Rachel M. Cherrick.

The first lecture in the series, entitled “More than Words: Living Out Biblical Justice,” will be delivered by Prof. Eliyahu Assis on June 5th and will be available free to the public both on campus and online through Bar-Ilan University’s website and social media platforms.

According to the university and its supporters, the goal of the lecture series is to promote a rich, intellectually rigorous, and spiritually inspiring exploration of Jewish Studies. Each year, the Dean of the Faculty of Jewish Studies will appoint a prominent scholar to deliver a lecture covering one or more facets of the Jewish intellectual tradition — from biblical Hebrew and Jewish law, to mysticism, art, culture, archaeology, feminism, and more.

“We deeply appreciate not only the Cherricks’ generosity but also their vision in creating a lecture series that simultaneously enriches the academic community and strengthens Jewish life,” said Jessica Feldan, CEO of American Friends of Bar-Ilan University. “Crucially, the Cherrick family has recognized that Bar-Ilan — a Jewish university with Jewish values — is the ideal home for actualizing that vision. Students at Bar-Ilan, the only major research university in Israel with a Jewish Studies requirement, graduate with a deeper understanding of what it means to be Jewish and to have a Jewish state. This lecture series promises to take the university’s impact on Israeli and global Jewish identity to even greater heights.”

The new lecture series honors the memory of Adam Cherrick z”l, late son of Jordan and Lorraine Cherrick, and Bernard Cherrick z”l, Jordan’s cousin and religious mentor who served as Vice President of The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. A distinguished figure in Jewish education and a rabbinic leader in London before moving to Israel in 1947, Bernard Cherrick’s name carries profound meaning in the spheres of Israeli academia and Jewish thought.

“We are gratified that the Adam Cherrick & Bernard Cherrick Memorial Lecture Series will transmit the highest level of a broad range of Jewish educational topics and consequently, serve to bolster Jewish identity and continuity,” said Jordan Cherrick. “Our family chose Bar-Ilan University to host the annual lecture due to the university’s acclaimed Jewish Studies program, which truly stands out among its peers at other higher education institutions across Israel. Bar-Ilan advances the vibrancy of Judaism in the context of the religious and ethical model established by Rabbi Soloveitchik himself, rooted in his belief that Torah and secular studies are both essential for leading a genuine religious Jewish life in modern times.”

Cherrick is a graduate of Yeshiva University (summa cum laude) and Boston University School of Law, and was deeply influenced by the teachings of Rabbi Dr. Joseph B. Soloveitchik z”l, the modern Orthodox luminary whose commitment to blending traditional Torah learning with secular scholarship inspired generations.

Lorraine Cherrick, a Yale alumna and attorney who serves as executive president, general counsel, and secretary of CSI Leasing, Inc., and Rachel Cherrick, a graduate of Barnard College with a Master of Social Work from Washington University in St. Louis, are also integrally involved in the project, underscoring a multigenerational commitment to Jewish continuity and education.

The inaugural lecture will be delivered by Prof. Eliyahu Assis, a highly respected Bible scholar and former Dean of Bar-Ilan’s Faculty of Jewish Studies. His distinguished career includes service as the chair of the Bible Studies Committee at Israel’s Ministry of Education and significant contributions to biblical narrative analysis.

Oversight for the annual series will be led by Prof. Michael Avioz, current Dean of the Faculty of Jewish Studies and a full professor in the Department of Bible. Prof. Avioz specializes in biblical historiography and prophetic literature and is a noted authority on early Jewish interpretation, especially the writings of Josephus.

The university expects the series to become a cornerstone of its public educational outreach, with the potential to reach thousands of students, academics, and laypeople across Israel and the Jewish diaspora.

As Jewish communities worldwide face challenges to tradition, education, and identity, the Adam Cherrick & Bernard Cherrick Memorial Lecture Series at Bar-Ilan stands as a powerful testament to the enduring role of Jewish scholarship in shaping the future of Jewish life. Through thoughtful dialogue and rich academic engagement, this initiative promises to inspire, inform, and elevate generations to come.

AOC Threatens Trouble Over Arrests of Democrats at ICE Protest

AOC stated that U.S. military aid to Israel is contributing to “violations of human rights” in Gaza. Credit: AP

AOC Threatens Trouble Over Arrests of Democrats at ICE Protest


(TJV NEWS) Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) lashed out on Instagram after three New Jersey Democrats were arrested outside an ICE facility, warning the Trump administration that “we’re going to have a problem” if more Democrats are taken into custody. She claimed the Department of Homeland Security—not the lawmakers—are the ones “breaking the law,” calling out former ICE Director Tom Homan and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem by name.

 

View this post on Instagram

 

A post shared by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@aoc)

The arrests occurred during a protest outside Delaney Hall detention center, where officials say the Democrats—including Rep. Bonnie Watson Coleman and Newark Mayor Ras Baraka—were part of a disruptive crowd. ICE maintains the facility is crucial for housing dangerous illegal immigrants, while local Democrat leaders say the feds never secured the proper permits.

AOC accused DHS of “public intimidation” and implied that law enforcement is being misused for political purposes. Rep. Watson Coleman called the arrests part of a broader pattern of Trump “weaponizing” law enforcement against his political enemies.

By recognizing Israel, ‘you’ll be greatly honoring me,’ Trump tells Saudis

(JNS ) U.S. President Donald Trump told Saudi Arabian officials that they ought to recognize Israel formally, and by doing so, “you’ll be greatly honoring me.”

“It’s been an amazing thing, the Abraham Accords. It’s my fervent hope, wish and even my dream, that Saudi Arabia, a place I have such respect for, especially over the last fairly short period of time—what you’ve been able to do,” Trump said in a speech in Riyadh on Tuesday, with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman looking on.

“But we’ll soon be joining the Abraham Accords. I think it will be a tremendous tribute to your country and something that’s going to be very important for the future of the Middle East,” the president said. “I took a risk in doing them. They’ve been an absolute bonanza for the countries that joined.”

Trump added that the Biden administration “did nothing for four years.”

“We would have had it filled out, but it will be a special day in the Middle East, with the whole world watching, when Saudi Arabia joins us,” he said.

“You’ll be greatly honoring all of those people that have fought so hard for the Middle East, and I really think it’s going to be something special.”

Trump added that the kingdom “will do it in your own time.”

Trump Admin Targets Iranian Nuclear Scientists in New Round of Sanctions

Iranian centrifuges from an April 17, 2021 video released by the state-run Islamic Republic Iran Broadcasting TV. (IRIB via AP, File

The Trump administration sanctioned three leading Iranian scientists on Monday for their work advancing the Islamic Republic’s atomic weapons program, the Washington Free Beacon has learned.

All three Iranians hold high-level positions in Tehran’s Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research, or SPND, the regime’s key nuclear weaponization agency. Their work consisted of critical research into “nuclear explosive devices” and advanced “missiles capable of delivering such weapons,” the State Department said.

The three individuals—Mohammed Reza Mehdipur, Sayyed Mohammad Reza Seddighi Saber, and Ahmad Haghighat Taleb—perform work related to the “proliferation of weapons of mass destruction.”

Mehdipur, a veteran SPND official who conducts “explosion and shock research,” leads a division that engages in “nuclear and explosives research and development efforts, including those with potential military applications.” Seddighi, who “works on explosives-related projects,” is involved in “the development of nuclear explosive devices.” Taleb, who has played a role in Tehran’s nuclear program since before its existence came to light, uses “his scientific expertise to advance Iran’s nuclear-related research and development efforts that have potential military applications,” according to information the State Department provided to the Free Beacon.

The Trump administration also introduced sanctions on Iran’s Fuya Pars Prospective Technologists, an “SPND-affiliated company that has attempted to procure from foreign suppliers, as well as indigenously fabricate, equipment that could be applicable in nuclear weapons research and development.”

Monday’s designations are the latest in a bevy of sanctions against Iran but the first from the Trump administration to target the scientists behind Iran’s march toward a nuclear bomb.

While the measures helped push the Islamic Republic to the negotiating table, they have also created friction amid ongoing talks. Tehran has insisted that the United States lift all sanctions as a precondition for a nuclear deal, with Iranian officials confirming that their desire for sanctions relief is the primary topic of discussion with the United States.

“The removal of sanctions is one of the bases for the talks, and it is something that both parties agree on,” Iranian foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said, adding that the regime believes maintaining its ability to enrich uranium is key to any potential deal.

The Trump administration, however, maintains that fresh sanctions are necessary to prevent Iran from completing its nuclear project.

“Iran continues to substantially expand its nuclear program and carry out dual-use research and development activities applicable to nuclear weapons and nuclear weapons delivery systems,” the State Department said. “Iran is the only country in the world without nuclear weapons that is producing uranium enriched to 60 percent and it continues to use front companies and procurement agents to obscure its efforts to acquire dual-use items from foreign suppliers.”

The Trump administration applied the sanctions just a day after the United States and Iran wrapped up their fourth diplomatic session in Oman.

White House envoy Steve Witkoff held “both direct and indirect” talks with Tehran that lasted more than three hours and ended with an agreement to hold future sessions related to the “technical elements” of a possible deal, according to a senior Trump administration official.

“We are encouraged by today’s outcome and look forward to our next meeting, which will happen in the near future,” the official told the Free Beacon.

While the administration has signaled it may be open to allowing Iran to enrich uranium for “civil nuclear power,” a group of Republican senators last week introduced a resolution making clear that continued enrichment is a nonstarter.

The resolution—introduced by Sens. Katie Britt (R., Ala.), Tom Cotton (R., Ark.), and Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.)—holds that any pact between the two countries must mandate that Iran “forgo domestic uranium enrichment, the reprocessing of spent fuel, and the development or possession of any enrichment or reprocessing infrastructure or capacity.”

Smotrich: No Path to Peace with Saudis Involves a Palestinian Terror State

Finance Minister and Religious Zionism party leader Bezalel Smotrich (Flash90/Yonatan Sindel)

Smotrich: No Path to Peace with Saudis Involves a Palestinian Terror State

By: Fern Sidman

As regional diplomacy heats up ahead of President Donald Trump’s Middle East tour, Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich doubled down Monday on Jerusalem’s red lines for normalization with Saudi Arabia, declaring unequivocally that no peace deal can come at the cost of Israel’s security or involve the creation of what he termed a “Palestinian terror state.” Speaking to The Jewish News Syndicate (JNS) during his Religious Zionism Party’s weekly faction meeting in Jerusalem, Smotrich clarified Israel’s approach to normalization, emphasizing the “peace for peace” model rather than one predicated on dangerous concessions.

“We think normalization is a good thing and in our mutual interest, both for us and for the Saudis—mainly the Saudis,” Smotrich told JNS. “But we will not, not even for a second, consider giving in to Saudi demands for a Palestinian state.”

Smotrich framed the geopolitical landscape of the Middle East as a battleground between two opposing camps: the “Iranian axis of evil and its proxies” versus the “moderate axis” aligned with the West and led by the U.S. “There’s huge development potential for the entire Middle East here,” he added. “If we subdue evil and wickedness—which we have been doing for a year and a half and will continue to do—we’ll build completely different alliances based on real peace and values.”

Crucially, Smotrich voiced deep reservations about reports that the U.S. is exploring ways to assist Saudi Arabia in developing a civilian nuclear program as part of the normalization package. “We think it isn’t right for the Saudis to have nuclear capabilities,” he warned. “That would be a strategic mistake.”

Smotrich’s comments come amid intensified speculation over a Saudi-Israel deal being brokered with U.S. assistance. As reported by JNS, President Donald Trump left Washington for Riyadh on Monday, with stops in Doha and Abu Dhabi. Trump hinted on May 6 at a “major announcement” to come before departure—“as big as it gets,” he said—fueling anticipation that Saudi-Israel normalization could be imminent.

Yet Smotrich made it clear that any such breakthrough must not compromise Israel’s national interests. “A Palestinian state in Judea and Samaria would be Gaza multiplied by 20,” he warned. “It would be a huge terror state, and geographically and topographically, it dominates the entire State of Israel.”

 

“If the Saudis want peace for peace, with a maximized win-win for everyone, we’re very happy about that,” Smotrich said. “If they’re asking us to commit suicide in the process—then no thanks.”

JNS also spoke with Israeli President Isaac Herzog, who, while more optimistic about the normalization process, reiterated that Israel must not succumb to regional pressure orchestrated by Iran and its terror proxies. Speaking from Berlin alongside German President Frank-Walter Steinmeier, Herzog said, “There is nothing I want more” than to shake hands with Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. “Are we moving toward inclusion of Israel in the region? Or are we caving into radical forces?”

Herzog’s sentiment was echoed by former Defense Minister Benny Gantz, who told JNS that any normalization deal must maintain Israel’s qualitative military edge (QME) and address core security concerns. “If you will have good relations, some form of normalization with the Saudis, that’s gonna be very important,” Gantz said. “But we have to look at it from the security perspective only.”

Gantz praised the precedent set by the Abraham Accords and subsequent agreements under the Trump administration, which ensured Israel’s military superiority in the region. “That’s the model we need to follow,” he emphasized to JNS.

Trump himself has made no secret of his intent to revive and expand the Abraham Accords during his second term. Speaking last month, he declared: “I think Saudi Arabia will go into the Abraham Accords. We had four countries in there. It was all set. Now we’re going to start it again.”

One fact remains unchanged: for Israel’s leadership, normalization cannot come at the price of strategic concessions, especially not to a Palestinian entity they see as a threat to Israel’s survival. As Smotrich told JNS, “We want real peace, not illusions—and certainly not terror wrapped in diplomacy.”

 

Federal Government to Cut an Additional $450 Million in Harvard Grants

Harvard University finds itself embroiled in controversy as a congressional committee investigating campus anti-Semitism accused the prestigious institution of obstructing its inquiry. Credit: Hillel.org
Eight federal agencies are terminating roughly $450 million in grants to Harvard University in addition to the $2.2 billion that was terminated previously, the Joint Task Force to Combat Anti-Semitism said in a May 13 statement published by the Department of Education.

“Harvard University has repeatedly failed to confront the pervasive race discrimination and anti-Semitic harassment plaguing its campus,” the statement said.

“Jewish students were subjected to pervasive insults, physical assault, and intimidation, with no meaningful response from Harvard’s leadership.”

In one incident, a protester who faced criminal charges for allegedly assaulting a Jewish student on campus was granted a $65,000 fellowship by the Harvard Law Review, an influential student-run journal, the task force said, adding that the fellowship was meant to “serve the public interest.”

“The decision was reviewed and approved by a faculty committee, demonstrating just how radical Harvard has become,” it said.

“Harvard’s campus, once a symbol of academic prestige, has become a breeding ground for virtue signaling and discrimination.”

By “prioritizing appeasement over accountability, institutional leaders have forfeited the school’s claim to taxpayer support,” the task force said.

As such, the agencies have decided to terminate $450 million in grants.

The Epoch Times has reached out to Harvard for comment on the latest cut in grant money.

The task force was formed in February pursuant to President Donald Trump’s executive order to combat anti-Semitism. The group aims to “root out anti-Semitic harassment in schools and on college campuses.”
The decision to cut $450 million in funding follows Harvard President Alan M. Garber’s letter on May 12 to the Education Department directed at Secretary of Education Linda E. McMahon.
It was written in response to a May 5 letter from McMahon that accused Harvard of “engaging in a systemic pattern of violating federal law,” along with alleging several ongoing issues, such as political bias on campus and the admissions process not being based on merit.

The Trump administration had proposed a series of “common sense” reforms such as ensuring merit-based admissions and hiring, ending programs promoting “crude identity stereotypes,” disciplinary reforms, cooperation with law enforcement, and reporting compliance with federal agencies such as the Education Department and the Department of Homeland Security, McMahon said.

“The Administration’s priorities have not changed and today’s letter marks the end of new grants for the University,” the May 5 letter said.

“Harvard should no longer seek GRANTS from the federal government, since none will be provided.”

‘Harvard Will Not Surrender’

In his May 12 letter, Garber accused the Trump administration of “overreach into the constitutional freedoms of private universities“ and ”continuing disregard of Harvard’s compliance with the law.”

“Harvard will not surrender its core, legally-protected principles out of fear of unfounded retaliation by the federal government,” he said.

Garber said he refutes the claim that Harvard is a partisan institution, saying the university “is neither Republican nor Democratic” and that it is not an arm of any political party or movement.

Admission to Harvard is based on “academic excellence and promise,” he said, adding that employment at the university is “similarly based on merit and achievement.”

Garber dismissed accusations that international students may be “collectively more prone” to violence, disruption, and other misconduct compared to other students.

Furthermore, the institution has taken steps to combat anti-Semitism and other forms of bigotry, Garber said.

Garber said the university has commenced initiatives to make Harvard a “more pluralistic and welcoming place” where there is greater intellectual diversity on campuses.

In her May 5 letter, McMahon said that “at its best, a university should fulfill the highest ideals of our Nation, and enlighten the thousands of hopeful students who walk through its magnificent gates. But Harvard has betrayed this ideal.”

McMahon accused Harvard of engaging in “ugly racism” in undergraduate and graduate schools, including within the Harvard Law Review itself.

On April 28, the Education Department announced it was investigating the journal.

In one alleged instance, the Harvard Law Review’s editor reportedly said it was “concerning” that four of the five individuals who wanted to reply to an article about police reform were white men, the Education Department said. In another alleged instance, an editor suggested expediting the review of submissions from minority contributors.

The May 5 letter criticized Harvard Corporation, which manages the university’s academic, financial, and physical resources. The corporation is being run by “strongly left-leaning Obama political appointee Penny Pritzker,“ the letter said, accusing her of ”running the institution in a totally chaotic way.”

In April, the Education Department announced freezing $2.2 billion worth of grants and $60 million in contracts to the university.
Early last month, Harvard issued $750 million in bonds to raise funds amid the conflict with the Trump administration. The bond sale followed a $450 million bond issuance in March.

Outrage Erupts After NHL Suspends Jewish Panthers Owner Doug Cifu for Condemning Hamas

By: Ariella Haviv

In a deeply controversial and polarizing move, the National Hockey League (NHL) has suspended Doug Cifu, the Jewish minority owner of the Florida Panthers, over comments he made on social media condemning Hamas and responding to antisemitic attacks. As VIN News has reported, the decision has sent shockwaves throughout both the Jewish community and the broader sports world, igniting fierce debate over the NHL’s handling of free speech and its stance on antisemitism.

The incident that sparked the firestorm began with a heated online exchange during the Panthers’ playoff series against the Toronto Maple Leafs. A Maple Leafs fan reportedly made a provocative comparison between headshots in hockey and the use of starvation as a weapon of war. In response, Cifu—whose social media profile features Israeli flags and who has been vocal in his support for Israel—called out the fan’s antisemitism and condemned Hamas, referring to the terror organization as “rats” and expressing a widely held sentiment: that Hamas should be eradicated.

Despite the fact that Cifu’s comments were directed at a U.S.- and EU-designated terrorist organization responsible for countless atrocities, including the massacre of Israeli civilians on October 7, 2023, the NHL reacted swiftly and harshly. As VIN News reported, the league issued a public statement labeling Cifu’s remarks as “unacceptable and offensive,” and suspended him indefinitely from any role with the Florida Panthers or league operations.

The NHL’s decision has provoked sharp criticism from Jewish advocacy groups, hockey fans, and defenders of free speech, who argue that the league is penalizing a Jewish man for speaking out against terror and antisemitism. According to the information in the VIN News report, this suspension is being seen by many as a capitulation to political correctness and a dangerous signal that Jewish voices are unwelcome in the public discourse when they speak in defense of their people and against genocidal terror.

“This isn’t just about Doug Cifu,” one community leader told VIN News. “This is about whether Jews are allowed to speak out against those who want to kill them without being punished for it. The NHL is sending the message that they’re not.”

Cifu has since issued a statement apologizing for what he called “regrettable and inflammatory” language, but many believe the apology was compelled by immense institutional pressure rather than genuine remorse. As the report at VIN News noted, Cifu’s original statements reflected the sentiments echoed by most Western governments, which have strongly condemned Hamas and its brutal tactics.

Critics have accused the NHL of hypocrisy, noting that the league has previously encouraged players and teams to speak out on social and political issues—particularly those related to racial injustice and equality. However, when a Jewish owner denounces a terrorist group that targets Jews, the response was not support, but censorship.

The controversy, reported by VIN News, comes amid a disturbing surge in antisemitism worldwide, exacerbated by the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas. In this context, the NHL’s choice to suspend Cifu has drawn even more ire, as many interpret it as an example of institutional indifference—or worse, hostility—toward Jewish concerns.

Jewish leaders and public figures have called on the NHL to reverse the suspension and issue a public apology. “Doug Cifu did what anyone with a conscience would do,” said another source to VIN News. “He stood up against terrorism. He stood up for his people. That the NHL would punish him for this is nothing short of disgraceful.”

The incident has also reignited broader conversations about the role of sports leagues in navigating global issues and the limits of political expression in professional athletics. While some argue that sports should remain apolitical, others maintain that silence in the face of hate—especially when directed at a particular group—is itself a political statement.

For Cifu and those who support him, the message is clear: the NHL’s decision to suspend a Jewish team owner for denouncing antisemitism and condemning Hamas represents a troubling precedent. This episode reveals the risks that Jewish individuals face when they dare to speak up, even in spaces where tolerance and justice are supposed to prevail.