22.7 F
New York
Friday, January 24, 2025
Home Blog Page 2

US Jewish groups spent more, some exponentially so, lobbying in 2024 than prior year

House passes resolutions to combat Jew-hatred, strip funding from terror-linked nonprofits
Flash 90 image

The Republican Jewish Coalition increased its lobbying expenses by an even greater percentage as it pushed for more aid to Israel, sanctions against Iran and other issues.

Several other major Jewish groups also reported increased spending on lobbying last year compared with 2023, and Israel’s war with Hamas and a spike in antisemitism contributed to the totals, even as the organizations also pursued separate agendas.

“Given Oct. 7 and the war, each of them is not pursuing an identical agenda but they have serious concerns that are well-founded, given the volatile situation in the Middle East and what’s at stake and the importance of the U.S. role here,” Guy Ziv, a professor at American University and associate director of its Center for Israel Studies, told JNS.

There’s also “the worldwide uptick of antisemitism that unfortunately has also hit parts of the United States,” he said.

The ADL spent $1.4 million to lobby in 2024, up 94% over the $723,000 spent during the previous 12 months, according to U.S. Senate records and the research group OpenSecrets.

“ADL has recently lobbied for a vast legislative agenda,” Max Sevillia, the nonprofit’s senior vice president of national affairs, told JNS. “Following the dramatic rise in antisemitism and other extremist hate, from Pittsburgh to Poway to El Paso to Jersey City to Jan. 6 to Colleyville, ADL made a strategic decision to invest in its policy apparatus, which has culminated in more robust government relations capabilities.”

The ADL has championed several pieces of legislation to address the rise in Jew-hatred and has pushed to make sure the provisions of former President Joe Biden’s National Strategy to Counter Antisemitism are followed, Sevillia said.

Julie Rayman, managing director of policy and political affairs at the American Jewish Committee, told JNS that Jewish Americans wanted groups representing them to increase their activities “recognizing what’s going on in Israel and the state of antisemitism in the United States and globally,”

In the first nine months of 2024, the AJC surpassed its total 2023 lobbying figures, $53,000 to $50,000. Fourth-quarter numbers were not available.

“The Jewish community is wanting it,” Rayman told JNS. “They’re demanding it. They’re recognizing the threat and want to be part of the solution.”

The Republican Jewish Coalition’s lobbying expenses grew 344% from 2023 to 2024, as the GOP group spent $400,000 last year after reporting expenses of $90,000 in 2023.

“In 2024, the RJC’s work fighting for the policy priorities of the American Jewish community grew in scope and scale,” Sam Markstein, the group’s spokesman, told JNS.

“Whether it was supporting the successful effort to deliver critical military aid to Israel, sanctioning the Iranian regime or defunding terrorism-complicit organization UNRWA,” the U.N. Relief and Works Agency, “the RJC was made for a moment like this,” Markstein said.

Other groups reported much smaller boosts. J Street spent $595,000 in 2024, up 14% from $520,000 in the previous year. The Zionist Organization of America’s lobbying spending rose by 13% to $180,000 last year from $160,000 during the previous 12 months.

Lobbying expenses for Hadassah, the Women’s Zionist Organization of America, grew to $240,000, an increase of 9% over the $220,000 spent in 2023. The American Israel Public Affairs Committee increased its lobbying spending by 9% to $3.3 million in 2024 from $3.1 million the year before.

A source familiar with AIPAC’s lobbying activities told JNS that it was linked to pushing for the largest aid package in Israel’s history.

It’s not only lobbyists but individuals who are getting involved, according to Rayman, of the American Jewish Committee.

The AJC sends out “action alerts” and urges supporters to contact their elected officials. Such contacts rose to 1.2 million last year from 830,688 in 2023, the group said. That’s a 40% increase.

“People’s willingness to be involved is another part of this story,” Rayman said.

Musk didn’t do Nazi salute, Holocaust survivor says

JNS)
Sami Steigmann, a Holocaust survivor who has spoken to thousands of students over the years, believes that media reports accusing the billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk of performing a Nazi salute at an inauguration celebration mischaracterize the facts.

“It was not a Nazi salute,” Steigmann told JNS. “Give me a break. He suddenly became a Nazi? No.”

“He just raised his hand, and he was very excited that Trump has won the presidency and that he had a part in helping him,” Steigmann, 85, who lives in Manhattan, told JNS. “It’s not a big deal. But there are people that want to make it into a big deal. He is not an antisemite.”

Subscribe to The JNS Daily Syndicate and never miss our top stories and analyses
Email
By signing up, you agree to receive emails from JNS.

The accusations are part of the political game, according to Steigmann.

“He is too close to Trump, and everyone who is close to him can be a target,” Steigmann said. “Elon Musk did something that nobody thought could be done.”

Musk helped get Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon, and Mark Zuckerberg, co-founder of Facebook, to attend Trump’s inauguration.

“Nobody would have thought that could happen,” Steigmann said. “People are jealous of success, and they have been against him since he bought Twitter and threw his support behind Trump.”

Steigmann added that MSNBC was wrong to compare the rally that then-presidential candidate Donald Trump held at Madison Square Garden to the Nazi rally that took place at the venue in 1939.

“The media makes money from confrontation. It was stupid and idiotic to call that rally a Nazi rally,” he said. “They will use every opportunity to say how terrible Musk is, and they will try to go to extremes.”

‘They are looking for attention’

Told that the Anti-Defamation League is facing backlash for posting that Musk’s gesture was not antisemitic, Steigmann was not surprised.

“The ADL is correct it was not a Nazi salute,” he said. “But many in the media are furious that Trump won, and this is a way to attack him—by attacking Musk.”

Steigmann said white supremacists posting that Musk made a Nazi salute don’t have much meaning in the grander scheme of things. “They are looking for attention in any way possible,” he said.

Steigmann thinks that the media should focus on real antisemitism from Hamas and Iran, among other places.

Steigmann’s recent presentations to schools have included discussions about the attacks of Oct. 7. He told JNS that he has great concerns about the hostage deal and did not want so many murderers to be released, setting a bad precedent, but he understands that words have to have meaning.

“To stop Hezbollah and Iran from attacking, Biden said ‘don’t,’” Steigmann said. “We saw those words had no meaning and they did not care, and Hezbollah and Iran still attacked.”

“So when Trump said there would be hell to pay if hostages were not returned, he had to show that his words had meaning,” he said. Steigmann added that he thinks that Trump promised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that “if Hamas doesn’t follow through, he has a free hand against the terrorists.”

Trump signs executive order calling for Houthis to be relisted as terror group

Houthi terrorists Credit: (AP/Hani Mohammed

U.S. President Donald Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday calling on the U.S. secretary of state to designate the Houthis as a terror group within the next 30 days.

Trump designated the Iranian-backed group—which is also known as Ansar Allah—as a foreign terrorist organization in January 2021, during his first term.

“Within one month of taking office, the Biden administration reversed the Houthis’ designation,” per a White House fact sheet. “As a result of the Biden administration’s weak policy, the Houthis have fired at U.S. Navy warships dozens of times, launched numerous attacks on civilian infrastructure in partner nations and attacked commercial vessels transiting” between Yemen and the Horn of Africa “more than 100 times.”

“Under President Trump, it is now the policy of the United States to cooperate with its regional partners to eliminate the Houthis’ capabilities and operations, deprive them of resources and thereby end their attacks on U.S. personnel and civilians, U.S. partners and maritime shipping in the Red Sea,” the White House stated.

In the executive order, Trump stated that the Houthis, which are supported by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps Quds Force, “have fired at U.S. Navy warships dozens of times since 2023, endangering American men and women in uniform.”

“Since seizing most Yemeni population centers by force from the legitimate Yemeni government in 2014-15, the Houthis have launched numerous attacks on civilian infrastructure, including multiple attacks on civilian airports in Saudi Arabia, the deadly January 2022 attacks on the United Arab Emirates and more than 300 projectiles fired at Israel since October 2023,” Trump stated.

“The Houthis have also attacked commercial vessels transiting Bab al-Mandeb more than 100 times, killing at least four civilian sailors and forcing some Red Sea maritime commercial traffic to reroute, which has contributed to global inflation,” he added.

Once the U.S. secretary of state, in consultation with the U.S. attorney general and the U.S. treasury secretary, determines that an entity ought to be designated as a terror group, “Congress is notified of the secretary’s intent to designate the organization and given seven days to review the designation, as the Immigration and Nationality Act requires,” per the State Department.

If Congress doesn’t block the designation during a seven-day waiting period, “notice of the designation is published in the Federal Register, at which point the designation takes effect,” per the department. The designated entity then has 30 days to seek judicial review in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, it adds.

The new executive order calls for the U.S. Agency for International Development administrator and the secretary of state, after the Houthis are redesignated, to “jointly review United Nations partners, nongovernmental organizations and contractors operating in Yemen.”

Trump
U.S. President Donald Trump signs executive orders on the first day of his second term, Jan. 20, 2025. Credit: White House.

“Following this review, the president will direct USAID to end its relationship with entities that have made payments to the Houthis, or which have opposed international efforts to counter the Houthis while turning a blind eye towards the Houthis’ terrorism and abuses,” the White House said.

“Thank you, President Trump,” wrote Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.). “They should never have been removed in the first place. Designating the Houthis as a foreign terrorist organization sends a powerful message that America views this group as a clear threat to our allies and partners and to regional stability in the Middle East.”

“Promises made, promises kept,” stated the Republican Jewish Coalition. “Thank you President Trump for correcting the disastrously wrong-headed decision by the Biden administration to de-list the Houthis as a foreign terrorist organization.”

Former Israeli Hostages Reveal Captivity in U.N. Camp During Ceasefire with Hamas

Israeli hostages Romi Gonen, Doron Steinbrecher and Emily Damari. Credit: Hostages and Missing Families Forum.

Former Israeli Hostages Reveal Captivity in U.N. Camp During Ceasefire with Hamas

Edited by: Fern Sidman

Israeli hostages released as part of the recently implemented ceasefire agreement with Hamas have revealed shocking details about their captivity, claiming they were held in a United Nations-run camp in Gaza. The Washington Examiner reported that hostages Romi Gonen, Emily Damari, and Doron Steinbrecher, who were freed on Sunday, disclosed these allegations during their debriefing, as first reported by Israel’s Channel 13. While specifics regarding which camps, the duration of their stay, or exact timelines remain unclear, these revelations have raised significant questions about the operations of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA).

According to the information provided in The Washington Examiner report, this revelation deals another blow to the credibility of the UNRWA, which has faced intense scrutiny and criticism throughout the ongoing conflict in Gaza. The organization, tasked with supporting Palestinian refugees since its establishment in 1948-1949 following Israel’s War of Independence, operates eight refugee camps in the Gaza Strip. These camps, far from resembling traditional refugee settlements, have evolved into densely populated urban areas, with some hosting over 100,000 residents. The majority of Gaza’s population is registered as refugees under the agency’s mandate.

The report in The Washington Examiner indicated that while UNRWA provides essential services such as education, healthcare, and humanitarian aid through its network of over 300 installations and 13,000 staff members, it does not administer or police these camps. Instead, governance falls under Hamas authorities. This operational arrangement has long been criticized, with Israel repeatedly accusing the agency of harboring individuals with ties to Hamas. Last year, evidence emerged that 19 UNRWA employees were affiliated with the Iranian-backed terror group. While the agency fired nine staff members following investigations, insufficient evidence was found to act against the remaining 10, The Washington Examiner reported.

The prolonged captivity of Gonen, Damari, and Steinbrecher—spanning an astonishing 471 days—call attention to the harrowing conditions faced by hostages during the conflict. The Washington Examiner highlighted that their release is part of a broader ceasefire agreement aimed at securing the freedom of all remaining hostages in stages over the coming weeks. However, their detention in a UN camp raises critical questions about the role and accountability of international organizations operating in conflict zones, especially amidst allegations of complicity or negligence.

UNRWA perpetuates the myth that Palestinians remain refugees, despite the fact that Gaza is their home and its civilian population democratically elected Hamas. This false narrative has been wielded as a tool to garner international sympathy and cast Israel as an oppressor, distracting from the reality that Palestinian leadership has consistently prioritized terror over governance.

Efforts to seek clarification from UNRWA regarding these allegations remain ongoing. As noted by The Washington Examiner, the agency has consistently maintained that it operates within its humanitarian mandate and does not engage in security-related activities within the camps. Yet, the persistence of allegations linking UNRWA staff and facilities to Hamas activities continues to cast a shadow over its credibility, particularly in the eyes of Israeli authorities and international observers.

New York Rep. Elise Stefanik, President Donald Trump’s nominee to become the ambassador to the United Nations told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Tuesday during her testimony that she will use the role to combat “anti-Semitic rot” at the UN.

Rep. Stefanik characterized UNRWA as a “program that is not meeting the mission of the UN. We need to roll our sleeves up, deliver reforms and make sure our dollars are going to programs within the UN that work and have a basis in rule of law, transparency, accountability and strengthen our national security.”

She added that “We should never tolerate any US taxpayer funds going toward terrorism. I was one of the members that voted to defund UNRWA… We can look to organizations within the UN which are proven organizations such as UNHCR, the World Food Program – which still need reform efforts and modernization – but don’t have the terrorist ties that UNRWA had that were exposed during October 7.”

Her statement follows President Trump’s signing of an executive order on Monday that would halt all new US funding for UNRWA. Two Trump administration officials emphasized that the move aligns with Trump’s broader agenda to cut foreign aid that does not serve America’s national interests. The US had previously halted aid to UNRWA in 2018 during Trump’s first term, but funding was resumed under the Biden Administration.

Former US Ambassador to Israel, David Friedman, described the decision as a “great start” for the new administration, which is reassessing foreign aid.

Birthright Citizenship Isn’t Real

Authored by Ryan McMaken via The Mises Institute,

Donald Trump yesterday issued a new executive order declaring that so-called “birthright citizenship” does not apply to the children of foreign nationals residing illegally within the United States.

 

The order reads, in part:

 (a) It is the policy of the United States that no department or agency of the United States government shall issue documents recognizing United States citizenship, or accept documents issued by State, local, or other governments or authorities purporting to recognize United States citizenship, to persons: (1) when that person’s mother was unlawfully present in the United States and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth, or (2) when that person’s mother’s presence in the United States was lawful but temporary, and the person’s father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of said person’s birth.

There is a common misconception in the United States that the Fourteenth Amendment to the US Constitution mandates that the US government grant citizenship to anyone and everyone born within the borders of the United States.

This misconception is largely due to the fact that, for several decades, US courts and technocrats have conspired to redefine the original meaning of the amendment, and thus apply it to every child of every tourist and foreign national who happens to be born on this side of the US border.

Some have even attempted to define access to birthright citizenship as some sort of natural rightThis is a common tactic among some libertarians who have twisted the idea of property rights to extend the idea of a “right” to the governmental administrative act known as “naturalization.”

Even when looking at the issue strictly in terms of procedural legal rights, however, it is clear that the current definition of birthright citizenship is in conflict with the law as originally intended and interpreted.

To understand the central point of contention, let’s note the text of the Fourteenth Amendment itself, which states that citizenship shall be extended to: “[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof…”

Note that there are two qualifying phrases here.

The persons in question must be both born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.

It is this second qualification that remains a matter of debate.

What does it mean to be subject to the jurisdiction of the United States? This issue is explained by legal scholar Hans Spakovsky who notes that advocates of granting birthright citizenship to anyone born in the United States

erroneously believe that anyone present in the United States has “subjected” himself “to the jurisdiction” of the United States, which would extend citizenship to the children of tourists, diplomats, and illegal aliens alike.
But that is not what that qualifying phrase means. Its original meaning refers to the political allegiance of an individual and the jurisdiction that a foreign government has over that individual.
The fact that a tourist or illegal alien is subject to our laws and our courts if they violate our laws does not place them within the political “jurisdiction” of the United States as that phrase was defined by the framers of the 14th Amendment.
This amendment’s language was derived from the 1866 Civil Rights Act, which provided that “[a]ll persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power” would be considered citizens.
Sen. Lyman Trumbull, a key figure in the adoption of the 14th Amendment, said that “subject to the jurisdiction” of the U.S. included not owing allegiance to any other country.

The courts themselves have historically recognized this distinction, noting that the whole purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment was to grant citizenship to former slaves who obviously were not connected to any other country or sovereign. In the Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1872), the court ruled:

That [the Fourteenth Amendment’s] main purpose was to establish the citizenship of the negro can admit of no doubt. The phrase ‘subject to its jurisdiction’ was intended to exclude from its operation children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States.”

This was further confirmed by the Court in 1884 (in Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94) when the Court stated that the idea of birthright citizenship did not apply to Native American tribes which were nonetheless within the borders of the United States:

“[The Fourteenth Amendment] contemplates two sources of citizenship, and two sources only: birth and naturalization. The persons declared to be citizens are ‘all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’ The evident meaning of these last words is, not merely subject in some respect or degree to the jurisdiction of the United States, but completely subject to their political jurisdiction, and owing them direct and immediate allegiance. And the words relate to the time of birth in the one case, as they do to the time of naturalization in the other. Persons not thus subject to the jurisdiction of the United States at the time of birth cannot become so afterwards, except by being naturalized, either individually, as by proceedings under the naturalization acts; or collectively, as by the force of a treaty by which foreign territory is acquired. Indians born within the territorial limits of the United States, members of, and owing immediate allegiance to, one of the Indian tribes (an alien though dependent power,) although in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more ‘born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof,’ within the meaning of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, than the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government, or the children born within the United States, of ambassadors or other public ministers of foreign nations.”

In short, the court recognized that the tribal lands were within the legal jurisdiction of the United States, but this did not mean that everyone born within those borders was automatically granted citizenship. Those tribal members believed to be subjects of “foreign” tribal governments were therefore not “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States in a way that conferred automatic citizenship.

Congress further reinforced the court’s interpretation by adopting new legislation granting citizenship to all tribal members in 1924. Had the Fourteenth Amendment really granted automatic citizenship to everyone born within the borders of the United States, no such legislation would have been necessary.

In the year 2024, however, advocates of the new and novel interpretation of “birthright citizenship” insist that the child of foreign nationals automatically becomes a citizen of the United States based entirely on the location of birth. 

This is a rather odd way of doing things. In historical practice nearly everywhere, citizenship depends largely on the citizenship of parents, or on the parents’ place of birth, and not on the place where parents happen to temporarily reside when the child is born. Thus, historically and globally, the child of foreign nationals is himself a foreign national. This is true, for instance, of children born to American nationals overseas.

Only in the United States does there appear to be widespread confusion about this.

Of course, some libertarian or “classical liberal” readers might argue that such legal precedents are meaningless, and that everyone “deserves” the legal “right” of citizenship. How citizenship is any sort of natural right or property right, however, remains a mystery. Has the child somehow “homesteaded” his citizenship? Obviously not. Has the child entered into a contract with a legitimate property owner to acquire the “property” of citizenship? To ask these questions is to see the absurdity of them.

On the other hand, it is important to note that a lack of citizenship in any particular place does not negate anyone’s property rights. Real property rights—what Rothbard called “universal rights”—exist regardless of one’s citizenship, where he lives, or where he happens to have been born.

Trump Calls Out Bishop’s Political Sermon at National Prayer Service

Trump Calls Out Bishop’s Political Sermon at National Prayer Service

(TJV) President Trump did not hold back in expressing his disappointment with the sermon delivered at the National Prayer Service by the far-left Episcopalian Bishop Mariann Edgar Budde. Taking to social media, Trump criticized the bishop for using the pulpit to launch political attacks, calling her remarks “nasty,” “ungracious,” and “boring.”

The bishop, known for her outspoken activism, used the event to urge Trump to show “mercy” toward illegal immigrants and transgender individuals. She also painted a dramatic picture of fear and persecution, claiming many in the country were living in terror due to his policies.

Trump fired back, pointing out the real concerns of American citizens, including victims of crimes committed by illegal immigrants. He argued that her sermon ignored these pressing issues and amounted to political grandstanding, adding, “She is not very good at her job!”

The bishop’s speech included pleas for compassion for undocumented workers and calls for assistance to refugees, but Trump and many attendees were unimpressed. Trump later remarked sarcastically to reporters, “What did you think? Not too exciting, was it?”

The event, meant to unify and inspire, instead highlighted a growing divide, as the bishop appeared more focused on scoring political points than fostering unity. For many, this was yet another example of activists using religion as a tool to push their agenda

NYC Mayor Eric Adams Tells Tucker Carlson How Biden, Staff Instructed Him To ‘Be A Good Democrat’ On Immigration

(Daily Caller News Foundation)  Democratic New York Mayor Eric Adams told Daily Caller News Foundation co-founder Tucker Carlson during a podcast episode Tuesday that former President Joe Biden and his staff allegedly told him to “be a good Democrat” when it came to handling illegal migrants in the city.

In December 2023, Adams and other sanctuary city mayors pleaded with the Biden-Harris administration for help with the migrant crisis, as their cities had received thousands of migrants. On “The Tucker Carlson Interview,” Carlson asked the Democratic mayor what some of his meetings with Biden and his administration were like, adding how Adams and state taxpayers were left “to deal” with illegal migrants who needed housing, food and other aid. (RELATED: NYC Shelled Out Millions In Taxpayer Funds For Deportation Defense Cases As Migrant Crisis Crippled City)

“I spoke with Julie Chavez [Rodriguez], [she] is one of the [Biden] personnel. [Tom] Perez, another personnel. I spoke with the president himself. I spoke with the president first, and then the president came here to New York City,” Adams said.

“The governor and I sat down with the president. I said, ‘Mr. President, I’m not sure what they’re telling you about this problem. But this is a terrible problem that’s playing out on the ground that we need to fix our border,’” Adams added. “‘We need to just stop allowing people to come into the country with no destiny. We don’t know what we’re doing with them, and they were stuck.’”

Under the Biden-Harris administration the U.S. southern border saw record high encounters from Border Patrol officials. Due to its sanctuary city title, New York City has dealt with a slew of issues regarding the massive amount of illegal immigrants that have entered after being bused in from Texas since 2023.

WATCH:

Adams went on to say the city was expected to house migrants sometimes up to two years, questioning where the resources would come from.

“There [were] some that were coming here that were almost six months to a year, in some cases two years, without any work authorization,” Adams said. “Like what do you do with someone that cannot provide for themselves for that long period of time?”

The mayor went on to say that the city was expected to “feed, house, clothe and educate” an estimated 40,000 migrant children, while also caring for migrant adults.

“So you tell the president and his aides this, and what do they say?” Carlson asked.

“Basically, ‘Be a good Democrat, Eric,’” Adams said. “That was the basic overall theme. One of his aides told me, ‘Listen, this is like a gallstone. It’ll pass.’”

Carlson appeared shocked by the statement.

“Yes, [they said] ‘It hurts now, but it’ll pass,’” Adams said.

“Well you pee it out then! Why do you have to?” Carlson asked.

In February 2024, Adams was seen appearing to call out migrant laws that were put in place as a result of being considered a sanctuary city.

The mayor, however, has appeared to flip-flop on the crisis as he cut aid to migrants by a rough total of 30% and imposed a curfew on several shelters, despite announcing in 2024 a new $53 million taxpayer-funded program that will hand out prepaid credit cards to the city’s illegal immigrants.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

Israel not committing to Palestinian state in exchange for Saudi deal, says Netanyahu confidant

Minister of Strategic Affairs Ron Dermer (AP/Carolyn Kaster)

By David Rosenberg, World Israel News

The Israeli government has made no commitments to recognize a Palestinian state in exchange for a normalization deal with Saudi Arabia, a senior Israeli minister and confidant of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told the Knesset on Wednesday.

Opposition MK Oded Forer (Yisrael Beytenu) asked Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer – a former ambassador to the United States who has not been elected to the Knesset but is a member of Netanyahu’s inner circle of advisers – whether the government had promised to back the establishment of a Palestinian state as part of a deal expanding President Donald Trump’s Abraham Accords to include Saudi Arabia.

“There isn’t any such promise regarding the establishment of a Palestinian state, none at all,” Dermer insisted.

Dermer also told the Knesset that Jerusalem will work closely with the Trump administration and regional allies to devise a plan for the postwar management of the Gaza Strip, without elaborating on who would be charged with securing or administering the coastal enclave.

“For awhile now, I’ve been hearing the need for an Israeli plan, and we’re actively working on it. I’m directly involved in shaping this strategy for the day after in Gaza.”

“Since it’s an Israeli initiative, we must align with both the United States and regional powers. I’m very optimistic that we can achieve effective management in Gaza post-conflict, fully in line with the Prime Minister’s framework. We’ll focus on action rather than words.”

Turning to the ongoing ceasefire in Lebanon between Israel and the Hezbollah terror organization, Dermer said Israel retains the right and “the ability to enforce any violation and will do what is necessary to maintain the security of the residents of the north.”

Dermer spoke shortly after the IDF revealed that Israeli forces had uncovered rocket launchers, anti-tank missiles, and other heavy weaponry hidden in caches in the Mount Dov area on the Lebanon-Israel border.

 

Adams Attends Trump Inauguration, Sparks Criticism for Missing Local MLK Day Events

Mayor Eric Adams attended Trump’s inauguration. Credit: Facebook

By: Ilana Siyance

Mayor Eric Adams made his way to Washington, DC for President Donald J. Trump’s inauguration, in the early hours of Monday morning, after receiving a last minute invitation.  As reported by the NY Post, Mayor Adams embarked at approximately 3 a.m., after the snow storm, driving to the national capital for Monday’s historic gathering at the Capital Building.  The trip, however, sparked criticism from some black leaders and liberal politicians, who said Hizzoner ditched Martin Luther King Jr. Day events that were planned in New York City.   Members of Adam’s administration defended Adam’s hasty departure, saying he attended so as to put New York City on the map.

“In the early hours of Monday morning, the Trump administration reached out inviting Mayor Adams to attend the inauguration at the incoming administration’s request,” Deputy Mayor of Communication Fabien Levy said.  “Mayor Adams accepted on behalf of New York City,” Levy said in a statement.  “As the mayor has repeatedly said, America has chosen a new national leader and we must work together to build a safer, stronger, and more affordable in (sic) New York City.”

Adams, a Democrat, only received a much-anticipated invitation to the inauguration in the middle of the night.  Some of his team members have been pushing the incoming Republican President for a pardon, so as to avoid Adam’s federal criminal trial alleging corruption, which is scheduled for April.  The invite came just days after Mayor Adams went to Florida for a sit-down meeting with the former and incoming President Trump, at which Adams claims his legal case was not discussed.

Some sour Democrats also criticized Adams saying he was seated in the overflow room, outside the main room where Trump made his inaugural address.  The indoor space at US Capitol Rotunda accommodated only the A-list Empire State political big shots including Hillary Clinton, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and former Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.  Adams was seated in the next room, and rubbed elbows with crypto billionaire Brock Pierce and social media personalities Jake and Logan Paul, and MMA star Conor McGregor.

Mayor Adams appeared in photos sitting a dozen rows back in the overflow room, along with Rev. Mark Burns, a televangelist, failed GOP congressional candidate and self-professed “close friend” of Trump, while the mayor’s security detail was five rows behind them.   “Can you imagine Mike Bloomberg, Rudy Giuliani or Ed Koch driving down to Washington, DC, in the middle of the night to attend an inauguration — and being relegated to a space reserved for C-list groupies?” one longtime New York Democrat sneered. “This is the kind of stuff only [former Mayor Bill] de Blasio would do, but worse!”

Per the Post, Adams had been scheduled to attend an MLK Day event in Harlem.  That event did go on, and was attended by many other prominent city elected officials including Comptroller Brad Lander, who is vying for the mayor’s seat in 2026, and Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.  Another mayoral challenger who attended the MLK day event was Rev. Michael Blake, a former assemblyman and Obama aide.  “He’s making it very clear to black and brown New Yorkers across New York City —- all that he cares about is staying out of jail,” Blake said of the Mayor.  “Eric Adams making a decision to go down to celebrate him over celebrating (Martin Luther) King, shows what he thinks. Eric Adams thinks Trump is King.”

NJ Gov. Phil Murphy Appeals to President Trump to Nix Congestion Pricing

NJ Gov Phil Murphy appealed to President Trump to nix the congestion pricing toll. Credit: AP

By:  Ilana Siyance

New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy appealed to United States President Donald J. Trump to nix the newly implemented congestion pricing toll, which commuters from the Garden State now pay to enter Midtown Manhattan.  “Today I sent a letter to President Trump urging  his Administration to reexamine New York’s congestion pricing scheme,” Gov. Murphy shared on Twitter.  “Congestion pricing is a disaster for New Jersey commuters and must receive the close look it deserves from the federal government.”

On Monday, shortly after President Trump was sworn in, Gov. Murphy sent him a letter. “As you begin your second term as president, I welcome any opportunity to work with you and your administration where we can find common ground,” Murphy, a Democrat, wrote in the letter to the Republican President.   “One area where we believe our priorities align is congestion pricing,” Murphy wrote.

As reported by the NY Post, Gov. Murphy wrote in the letter that Gov. Kathy Hochul and NY officials are abusing NJ drivers by penalizing them with a congestion fee to enter Manhattan south of 60th Street.  He noted that this toll gets coupled in addition to the other tolls they already pay to enter the business district from the Port Authority of NY’s Hudson River crossings to enter Manhattan.  “New York’s scheme has never been well designed or adequately studied,” Gov. Murphy said.  “The resulting congestion pricing plan is a disaster for working- and middle-class New Jersey commuters who need or want to visit lower Manhattan and now need to pay a big fee on top of the bridge and tunnel fees they already pay.”

Murphy reminded President Trump of his campaign promise. During the 2024 campaign, Trump had called the congestion pricing plan a “disaster”, a “massive business killer,” “the worst plan in the history of womankind”, and had promised to “TERMINATE congestion pricing in my FIRST WEEK BACK in office!!!” Trump even said that the Biden administration’s Department of Transportation and Federal Highway Administration “railroaded” approvals for congestion pricing before the administration change, knowing that Trump was  an opponent of the plan and would have blocked it.

On January 5th, New York City’s controversial congestion pricing program was put into action, charging vehicles $9, during peak weekday hours.  Trucks and buses pay $14 to $21 during peak hours. On weekends, or weeknights after 9 pm, the toll lowers to $2.25 for cars, or $3.60 to $5.40 for trucks and buses. The toll aims to ease traffic by luring people out of their cars and onto mass transit, and to reduce emissions, while also raising much-needed funds for the MTA’s subway expansions.

Per the Post, New Jersey motorists pay the full $9 congestion fee if they’re crossing into NY on the George Washington Bridge, and the three Staten Island bridges — the Bayonne, Goethals and Outerbridge Crossing. If, however, they cross the Hudson into NY via the Lincoln and Holland tunnels, they pay a $6 fee on top of existing tolls and get a $3 credit.  Murphy highlighted that Jersey communities also now have to deal with new traffic patterns rerouted to their areas, in a bid to circumvent the new toll.

Hochul Orders Flags Raised to Full-Staff for Inauguration Despite Carter’s Death

Hochul has directed all flags across the state to be raised to full-staff in recognition of Donald Trump’s inauguration as the 47th President of the United States. Credit: mountainlake.org

Edited by: TJVNews.com

In a significant and unconventional move, New York Governor Kathy Hochul has directed all flags across the state to be raised to full-staff in recognition of Donald Trump’s inauguration as the 47th President of the United States. The decision, which briefly suspends the current half-staff display honoring the late President Jimmy Carter, draws attention to the importance of the peaceful transfer of power, according to a report that appeared on Sunday in The New York Post.

Flags nationwide are presently flying at half-staff in mourning for Carter, who passed away on December 29 at the age of 100. Following standard protocol outlined in the American flag code, the lowering of flags on federal buildings, grounds, and naval vessels commemorates the death of any sitting or former president. However, as reported by The New York Post, Hochul has temporarily altered this tradition to acknowledge the historic nature of Inauguration Day.

“Tomorrow, we are all Americans as we observe the centuries-old traditions of Inauguration Day,” Hochul stated in a message shared on Sunday with The New York Post. She added, “For that reason, I am directing flags to fly at full staff throughout the State of New York on January 20 and return to half staff to honor the late President Carter on January 21. Regardless of your political views, the American tradition of the peaceful transition of power is something to celebrate.”

The move has drawn support from Staten Island Borough President Vito Fossella, who echoed similar sentiments in a letter addressed to Hochul. Obtained by The New York Post, Fossella’s letter urged the governor to honor Trump’s inauguration by raising the flags. “This gesture would serve as a symbol of unity and respect for the Office of the President, regardless of political affiliation,” Fossella wrote. “It is important to recognize and honor the democratic process and the peaceful transition of power that is a cornerstone of our nation’s values.”

“We want to thank Governor Hochul for hearing our request and issuing an order for flags across the state of New York to fly full staff tomorrow for the inauguration of President Trump,” Fossella, a Republican, told The New York Post.

Fossella also highlighted the broader significance of Hochul’s decision, calling it a step toward national unity. “The governor deserves credit for recognizing the importance of coming together as a nation and encouraging unity among all New Yorkers and Americans,” he said, according to The New York Post. “Tomorrow, we will look ahead to the future of our country.”

Hochul’s decision aligns her with other Democratic governors, including California’s Gavin Newsom and Colorado’s Jared Polis, who have also directed flags in their respective states to be flown at full-staff during the inauguration, as noted in The New York Post report. These actions demonstrate bipartisan recognition of Inauguration Day as a key event in American democracy, transcending political divides.

The gesture comes amid broader national discussions about the symbolic importance of unity and respect for democratic institutions. According to the information in The New York Post report, House Speaker Mike Johnson also ordered all U.S. flags at the Capitol to be raised to full-staff for Trump’s swearing-in, emphasizing the significance of maintaining traditions that celebrate the orderly transfer of power.

Hundreds of NY Republicans Travel to DC to Celebrate Trump Inauguration

NY State GOP Chairman Ed Cox toasted the end of the decade-long Democratic era. “We have to fight, fight, fight, to help the president move his agenda forward,” Cox said during the pre-inaugural celebratory breakfast at The Mayflower. Credit: AP

By:  Hellen Zaboulani

New York Republicans excitedly flocked to the Nation’s Capital for President Donald Trump’s inauguration, filled with optimism regarding the historic comeback and hopeful for other upcoming elections.

As reported by the NY Post, some 300 members of NYS’s Republican Party gathered at The Mayflower Hotel in Washington, DC on Sunday.  Top party leaders and elected officials gave buoyant speeches and expressed optimism about even possibly winning the governor’s  seat next year for the first time in a generation.  State GOP Chairman Ed Cox toasted the end of the decade-long Democratic era, which included the terms of President Barack Obama and President Joe Biden and the House speakership of Nancy Pelosi.   “We have to fight, fight, fight, to help the president move his agenda forward,” Cox said during the pre-inaugural celebratory breakfast at The Mayflower.

Lee Zeldin, appointed as Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency secretary, who had run a close election as the GOP’s 2022 candidate for NY governor, said he’s elated to be given the opportunity to help push through the Republican president’s agenda.  “Donald Trump was elected president because he understood this moment. He’s ready to meet this moment and prepared to lead this country to greatness,” Zeldin said

Per the Post, the two speakers who spoke next at the NY GOP breakfast are both eyeing a run against Democratic governor Kathy Hochul in 2026.  They were NY Rep. Mike Lawler and Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman of Long Island.  The last time NYS had a Republican governor was in 2002, with former three-term Gov. George Pataki.  Lawler said New Yorkers should be proud that Queens- born-and-raised Trump is back in the White House.  “Floridians think Donald Trump is theirs, but we know that Donald Trump is a New Yorker through and through,” Lawler said.  The congressman noted that they all had hard work ahead of them to get Congress to approve Trump’s plans for the economy and to secure the border.  He also took a jab at Gov. Hochul.  “Kathy Hochul is the most  inept and incompetent governor in the entire country,” Lawler said.

Blakeman, a Trump ally, touted the President’s historic comeback.  “They tried to put him in jail. They tried to kill him,” Blakeman said, referring to prosecutions and assassination attempts.  Blakeman said his policies are in line with President Trump, including cracking down on illegal immigration.

Other GOPers and big Business moguls also attended the DC events.  Among them was billionaire supermarket mogul and WABC radio talk show owner and host John Catsimatidis.  “We’re about to save America,” Catsimatidis said.

The entire GOP House delegation was slated to be in DC on Monday, where there was a flurry of balls, galas, and cocktail receptions in honor of the 47th President.  Per the Post, the most coveted events are the three official inaugural balls on Monday evening,  where Mr. Trump himself will speak.  These invitation-only events include the Commander in Chief Ball geared towards military service members, the Starlight Ball for the president’s top donors, and the Liberty Inaugural Ball focused on rank-and-file supporters.

“There’s a lot of excitement and energy. People are ecstatic that President Trump is returning and will undo the mess that Joe Biden created,” said Rep. Nicole Malliotakis (R-Staten Island/Brooklyn), the only Republican in NYC’s congressional delegation.

Cuomo Still Mulling Run for NYC Mayor, With Racial Politics Playing Big Role

Multiple sources have confirmed that former New York Governor Cuomo, 67, is eyeing a run for Mayor of NYC. Credit: AP

By: Benyamin Davidsons

In 2021, former New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo resigned in scandal, facing numerous allegations of sexual harassment as well as a federal investigation alleging his administration sought to cover up the number of nursing home deaths in the COVID-19 pandemic.  He had served as governor from 2011 till 2021, and previously as Attorney General of NY from 2007.  His father, the late Mario Cuomo had serves three terms as governor of New York.  Multiple sources have confirmed that Mr. Cuomo, 67, is hoping for a comeback, eyeing a run for Mayor of New York City.

The Democratic Primary for the ticket, to take place in June, is already crowded with well known-politicians including NY City Comptroller Brad Lander, former city Comptroller Scott Stringer, Queens state Sen. Jessica Ramos, Assemblymember Zohran Mandani, and Brooklyn state Sen. Zellnor Myrie.

As reported by the NY Times, Mr. Cuomo has not yet officially entered the race.  His primary concern, seems not to be the crowded list of contenders, but  the incumbent Mayor Eric Adams himself.  His insecurity may lie with a previous failed attempt in 2002, in which he had made his first try for the governor’s seat, pitted in the primary against a well-liked Black Democrat, H. Carl McCall.  Cuomo had dropped out days before the primary, describing the humiliation as “the worst thing that could happen to you, short of death.”  For a long time, black leaders begrudged Cuomo, blaming him for undermining McCall’s chances in politics.  Now, Cuomo is again mulling a primary run against a prominent Black leader– Mayor Eric Adams.  This time, he seems to be proceeding with caution.

Mayor Adams, who is facing federal corruption charges, has insisted on his innocence and vowed to fight to keep his seat in the upcoming election. Per the NY Times, in order to win, Cuomo would have to steal a sizable share of Black voters, whom are currently sympathetic to Mr. Adams – and he would have to win them over without igniting backlash.  Mr. Cuomo “can’t be seen as prospering off the misfortunes of Eric Adams,” warned the Rev. Johnnie Green Jr., the pastor of Mount Neboh Baptist Church in Harlem.

To further complicate things for Mr. Cuomo, opposition groups have already prepared ads portraying him as disrespectful and derisive to the Black community, per a Democratic source for the Times.  The ads will focus on racially charged comments Cuomo appeared to make in 2008, including the term “shuck and jive,” which some suggest referred to how Barack Obama, then a presidential candidate, deceived reporters. Per the NY Times, the ads also point to a more recent remark in which Cuomo accused Letitia James, the state’s Black attorney general, of “incompetence” after she led the investigation into accusations of sexual harassment against him, which helped end his term as governor.

For now, Cuomo is avoiding any type of face off with Mayor Adams, refraining from any criticism towards Adams.  In a heartening poll, published earlier this month by Democratic activist group Progressive Democrats of America, Cuomo led the primary pack dominating the field by being selected as the favorite candidate by a whopping 32% of those polled.  The runner up in the poll was Stringer, who still trailing far behind, being named top choice by 10% of responders.

NYC Looking to ‘City of Yes’ Rezoning Plans to Relieve Housing Crisis

The City Council passed the “City of Yes” – Credit: nyc.gov

By:  Serach Nissim

New York City has taken a historic step towards finally doing something about the housing crisis. Last month, after about 175 community board meetings and two public hearings, each of which lasted close to 15 hours, the City Council passed the “City of Yes”. As reported by the NY Times, these new rules are the most extensive set of zoning changes in over 60 years.  The last time an overhaul zoning package was written was 1961.  The new rules, work to roll back old restrictions which had been set in a different era with different needs, and which have stifled housing supply in the Big Apple for too long.  The guiding principle behind City of Yes is to distribute the responsibility of creating housing more evenly, extending it to every neighborhood in the five boroughs.

The plan is in stark contrast to the previous focus, which was to build tall skyscrapers in already high-density neighborhoods like Manhattan and northern Brooklyn, which sparked outcry of gentrification from local communities and led to years of litigation.   The crux of this new plan, is an emphasis on modest structures of five or six stories in any underused site.  The new changes also unlock the possibility for more easily converting office buildings into apartment buildings across the city.  The plan incentivizes development in practical ways, by relaxing or even eliminating overbearing requirements- which include rules about the number of parking spaces that must be allotted for new apartment complexes.

City of Yes will create more homes for lower income individuals and families over the next 15 years, than all of the city’s other inclusionary housing programs since they first came into existence in the mid-1980s, per estimates from the city’s planning department.  City of Yes is expected to produce roughly 80,000 new units of housing in total over the next 15 years.  Although the city needs some 500,000 new housing units to end the housing crisis, this is a good step.  The goal is to be aided in part by a new, state-sponsored tax incentive and a $5 billion contribution of additional city and state funds, which the City Council speaker Adrienne Adams fought for, per the Times.

Currently, the city is grappling with a 1.4 percent rental vacancy rate.  “Our only shot at solving New York’s affordability crisis is by building more housing — and that’s why I’m committing $1 billion for projects that will make ‘City of Yes’ a reality,” said Governor Kathy Hochul.  More specifically, the new plans will help address “the missing middle”.  Instead of setting aside a portion of a building as affordable, these rezoning rules will push for development of middle-class housing in suburban counties, created for and geared towards lower income residents.

Over the years, there have been new housing projects—however most of them were luxury housing, not affordable even for the middle class.  Developers had little incentive, or promise of returns, to build small apartment complexes.  Developers have sought to build massive glass towers, which local communities complain took away housing for the lower class instead of adding.

“We showed the nation that government can still be bold and brave by passing the most pro-housing piece of legislation in city history. Our administration proposed and fought hard for this proposal for more than year, and now New Yorkers are the ones who will benefit from lower rent,” said Mayor Eric Adams.

Driver’s Petition Against E-ZPass Late Fees in NY Gains Momentum

Mounting E-ZPass toll fees and penalties have New Yorkers fed up. Credit: tibridge.com

By: Jordan Baker

A Bronx resident, fed up with mounting E-ZPass toll fees and penalties, has launched an online petition demanding reform in the tolling system, including congestion pricing. The petition has rapidly gained traction, amassing over 7,000 signatures, according to the New York Post.

Joel Becerra, a longtime Bronx resident and the petition’s organizer, told the Post that he started the initiative after grappling with exorbitant late fees and penalties imposed by E-ZPass. He described the system as “legal extortion,” citing fees that can quickly spiral into thousands of dollars. “The absurd amount of tolls, violations, and fees that E-ZPass charges—it’s just wrong,” Becerra told the Post.

The petition outlines several key demands, including an independent review of congestion pricing, transparency in toll allocation, and a fair pricing system to prevent surprise fees and excessive penalties. “It makes you feel hopeless,” Becerra lamented, explaining how late fees often compound before drivers are even notified.

 

Mounting Frustration Over Late Fees

Some of the petition’s supporters shared their struggles with E-ZPass fees, with several falling into debt due to late penalties. Freddy Cordova, a 46-year-old New Jersey worker, told the New York Post that his monthly E-ZPass bills often exceed $300. “Bills can accrue without you actually noticing,” said motorist Nico Dancona. He recounted how a backlog of payments once left him with $1,200 in overdue fees.

Becerra himself has faced similar challenges, recounting how a $100 missed toll snowballed into over $1,000 due to late charges. He also criticized the delay in notifications, which often leaves drivers unaware of their debts until penalties accumulate. “One of the things they do is they wait,” Becerra told the Post, adding that license-plate readers sometimes fail, resulting in erroneous charges.

Critics of congestion pricing, which charges drivers for entering Midtown Manhattan, see it as yet another financial burden. Becerra and others argue that the new toll system disproportionately affects working-class individuals. “You’re going to spend at least $400 to $1,000 per month if you’re commuting regularly,” Becerra told the Post. For him, the subway isn’t a viable alternative, as it triples his travel time to visit his girlfriend in Queens.

The Post noted that the petition also calls for greater oversight of how toll revenue is spent. Supporters argue that the funds should go toward improving public transit rather than placing additional financial strain on drivers.

The New York Post reported that a proposed state bill, the Toll Payer Protection Act, sought to cap late fees and provide relief to drivers. However, the measure has repeatedly failed to pass under both former Governor Andrew Cuomo and Governor Kathy Hochul. In a 2022 statement, Hochul argued the bill would undermine the financial stability of the state’s transportation infrastructure.

Becerra has yet to receive a response from either the mayor’s or governor’s office regarding the petition. However, he plans to involve lawyers and advocacy groups to push for meaningful reform. Increased transportation costs are making residents like Becerra reconsider their future in New York City. “This is one of the best cities in the world, and it shouldn’t be like this,” Becerra told the Post.

For now, Becerra remains determined to fight what he and many others see as an unfair system. “I love New York,” he said, “but you do what you got to do to make sure that the living situation is right for your family and for yourself.”

Scaffolding Overload on Manhattan’s West End Ave Persists Despite City Crackdown

A stretch of Manhattan’s Upper West Side remains blanketed with unsightly scaffolding. Credit: Wikimedia Commons

By:  Hal C Clarke

A stretch of Manhattan’s Upper West Side remains blanketed with unsightly scaffolding, despite efforts by the city to reduce the structures. West End Avenue, notorious for its scaffolding density, has seen some progress since Mayor Eric Adams launched the “Get Sheds Down” initiative—but the area remains overwhelmed, reports the New York Post.

Over the past nine months, 19 scaffolding sheds have been removed from the avenue, yet five new ones have popped up, leaving only four unobstructed blocks in a nearly 40-block span. Residents liken the issue to a frustrating game of “whack-a-mole.”

 

Scaffolding Still Dominates West End Avenue

When the New York Post first examined West End Avenue in April 2023, the two-mile stretch between 107th and 72nd Streets was home to 57 scaffolding sheds, with just one block free of the structures. A recent count found 43 sheds still standing, with three additional blocks cleared. Yet, for many residents, the improvement is negligible.

“It’s like having braces on your teeth—you don’t want them there, but you get used to it,” said Carmen Anderson, 54, a longtime Upper West Sider. “I noticed a few scaffolds came down because suddenly I had sunlight on certain blocks. But overall, they’re still everywhere.”

Mike McDermott, a 70-year-old resident, echoed the sentiment: “Politicians and the news might spur temporary fixes, but new scaffolds just go up. There’s no stopping it.”

 

Mayor’s Scaffolding Initiative

Mayor Adams made tackling the city’s scaffolding problem a priority, rolling out the “Get Sheds Down” plan in July 2023. The initiative reduced scaffolding permit durations from 12 months to 90 days and increased fines for violations to $10,000. According to the Post, city records show that since the program began, 7,289 sheds have been removed, and over 100 property owners have been taken to court to compel scaffolding removal.

Despite these efforts, scaffolding still covers more than 390 cumulative miles of sidewalks citywide—a slightly greater distance than what records showed nine months ago.

 

A History of Scaffolding

Scaffolding laws were introduced in the 1980s after a Barnard College student tragically died from falling debris. Local Law 11 mandates exterior inspections for buildings six stories or taller and requires protective scaffolding during necessary repairs.

While the laws aim to ensure safety, they’ve also led to scaffolding structures that linger for years. The New York Post reports that landlords often delay costly repairs, instead opting to pay fines for extended scaffolding permits. For some buildings, these delays turn temporary fixes into semi-permanent features.

 

The Impact on Residents

West End Avenue’s scaffolding density is among the highest in the city. Though Broadway, Park Avenue, and Fifth Avenue have more scaffolding overall, those thoroughfares are three times longer. Residents along West End can walk nearly the entire stretch without seeing the sun, the Post notes.

“It’s part of the scenery,” McDermott said. “But it’s a shame—these are old, beautiful buildings, and no one gets to admire them.”

 

Future Outlook

The Department of Buildings remains optimistic about its progress, telling the Post that legislative changes could help speed up scaffold removal. “We look forward to the City Council’s enactment of new enforcement tools to get more sheds down faster,” a spokesperson said.

Yet, many West End residents are skeptical. For them, scaffolding has become a permanent fixture in their lives.