52.3 F
New York

tjvnews.com

Sunday, April 27, 2025
CLASSIFIED ADS
LEGAL NOTICE
DONATE
SUBSCRIBE
Home Blog Page 2

Israel Expands Strategic Air Power with Arrival of Three More F-35i “Adir” Fighter Jets

By: Fern Sidman

In a significant enhancement to its aerial combat capabilities, the Israeli Air Force (IAF) on Thursday night received three additional F-35i “Adir” stealth fighter jets, as confirmed by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) and reported by The Jewish News Syndicate (JNS). The aircraft, manufactured by Lockheed Martin in the United States, touched down at Nevatim Air Force Base, located near Beersheva, where they will immediately be integrated into Israel’s frontline operations.

The arrival of these fifth-generation jets—renowned for their stealth technology, advanced avionics, and versatility in both air superiority and strike missions—brings the total number of F-35is in Israel’s arsenal to 45, marking another milestone in the country’s continued military modernization.

As reported by JNS on Friday, the newly arrived aircraft will join the IAF’s elite 140th “Golden Eagle” Squadron, which has played a central role in Israel’s ongoing “Swords of Iron” war, launched in response to the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led terrorist onslaught against Israeli civilians. In the IDF’s own words, the squadron has been operating “under unprecedented pressure,” conducting offensive and defensive missions across multiple operational theaters.

The IDF underscored the strategic impact of the new aircraft, stating: “The addition of the new aircraft strengthens operational continuity and expands the Air Force’s ability to handle a wide range of threats—with precision, speed and depth.”

These enhancements are especially critical given the evolving nature of the threats Israel faces from Iran-backed militias, long-range missile attacks, and the multi-front threat environment in the region, including in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, and beyond.

The F-35i “Adir”, a uniquely modified version of the F-35A tailored specifically for Israel, includes custom Israeli avionics, electronic warfare systems, and weaponry integration. According to previous JNS reporting, Israel is the only country authorized by the U.S. to independently modify its F-35 fleet, allowing the IAF to adapt the aircraft for mission-specific demands and integrate it seamlessly into Israel’s existing command-and-control architecture.

This level of customization gives the IAF a critical edge in intelligence gathering, cyber warfare, and real-time target acquisition, key elements in both preemptive strikes and defensive maneuvers.

Thursday’s delivery is part of Israel’s initial procurement deal of 50 F-35 aircraft, a purchase that began delivery in 2016. In a significant development reported by JNS, the Israeli government finalized an agreement in June 2024 to acquire an additional 25 F-35s, which will bring the future fleet to 75 aircraft.

According to the Israeli Defense Ministry, delivery of this second batch is expected to begin in 2028, at a pace of three to five aircraft per year. This gradual scaling of capability is in line with Israel’s broader defense planning and long-term strategy to maintain regional air dominance, especially in light of Iran’s military entrenchment in Syria and the increasingly sophisticated weaponry in the hands of Hezbollah and other Iranian proxies.

As the JNS report noted, the timing of these aircraft arrivals is particularly crucial. With the Swords of Iron war still ongoing, and Israel facing the constant threat of rocket fire and terrorist infiltration, the introduction of advanced aircraft serves as both a tactical reinforcement and a symbolic message to its adversaries.

The F-35i’s role in Israel’s integrated defense doctrine cannot be overstated. Capable of executing deep-strike operations, suppressing enemy air defenses, and operating in contested electronic environments, the Adir is a force multiplier that enhances the IAF’s ability to neutralize threats before they can reach Israeli population centers.

With 45 F-35i aircraft now in service and 30 more set to arrive over the coming years, Israel is poised to solidify its status as the most advanced air power in the Middle East. As the JNS report indicated, this expansion is not merely about acquiring state-of-the-art hardware—it is about adapting to a new era of asymmetric warfare, cyber threats, and hybrid battlefields where stealth, speed, and precision determine outcomes.

In a region increasingly dominated by uncertainty, Israel’s investment in the F-35 program—and the strengthening of its 140th Squadron—demonstrates its unwavering commitment to defending its citizens, deterring its enemies, and maintaining strategic superiority well into the future

U.S. Justice Department Declares UNRWA No Longer Immune from Legal Accountability in American Courts

View of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) building in Gaza. (Abed Rahim Khatib/Flash90

U.S. Justice Department Declares UNRWA No Longer Immune from Legal Accountability in American Courts

By: Fern Sidman

In a historic shift with far-reaching legal and diplomatic consequences, the U.S. Department of Justice has informed the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York that the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA) no longer enjoys legal immunity in U.S. courts. The decision, announced Thursday, comes amid a high-profile lawsuit filed by families of victims of the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led terrorist massacre in southern Israel. The plaintiffs allege that UNRWA played a significant role in facilitating the atrocities—accusations that, if proven in court, could lead to immense financial and institutional repercussions.

According to a report that appeared on Friday in The Jewish News Syndicate (JNS), this legal development stems from a case launched last year, which seeks justice for those murdered or harmed during the deadliest single-day assault on Jews since the Holocaust. Plaintiffs argue that UNRWA aided and abetted terrorism, citing not only direct participation by agency employees in the attacks, but also alleging decades-long fraud and corruption in the handling of financial aid—some $1 billion of which may have ended up in the coffers of Hamas and other terror organizations in Gaza.

In a sharp reversal of previous U.S. policy, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York now holds that UNRWA cannot hide behind diplomatic immunity to avoid facing allegations in American courts. In a letter to District Judge Analisa Torres, the Justice Department acknowledged the gravity of the allegations, stating: “The complaint in this case alleges atrocious crimes committed by Hamas on Oct. 7, and its factual allegations, taken as true, detail how UNRWA played a significant role in those heinous offenses.”

The JNS report indicated that the letter further emphasized that while past administrations, including President Joe Biden’s, maintained that UNRWA and the United Nations were protected by blanket immunity, that interpretation has now been reconsidered.

“The government has since re-evaluated that position and now concludes that UNRWA is not immune from this litigation. Nor are the bulk of other defendants,” the filing stated.

As JNS reported, a cornerstone of the DOJ’s new position lies in the argument that UNRWA is not legally an organ of the United Nations, despite its long-standing association. Rather, it is an entity created by a resolution of the UN General Assembly, and the Justice Department questioned whether the General Assembly even possessed the legal authority to create such an agency under international law. This finding has potential implications not only for UNRWA’s future operations, but also for the structure and reach of U.N. immunity protections globally.

The legal exposure facing UNRWA is now substantial. Should the court find it culpable, UNRWA leaders, staff, and possibly the United Nations itself could be held liable for massive compensatory damages. Victims’ families could be awarded significant settlements for what they describe as the agency’s complicity in crimes against humanity.

Moreover, the JNS report emphaiszed that this ruling could reshape the legal landscape surrounding international organizations operating on U.S. soil. Questions are now being raised about whether this could jeopardize the legal protections of the United Nations headquarters in New York City, potentially affecting the entire U.N. diplomatic presence in the United States.

The ruling may also reinforce recent moves by the Israeli government, which in January 2025 officially banned UNRWA from operating in Israeli-controlled areas, citing evidence that at least 18 of its staff members actively participated in the October 7 massacre, as was reported by JNS. Israeli officials have long accused the agency of operating as a de facto arm of Hamas, offering educational programming steeped in antisemitic and violent content, and allowing U.N.-branded facilities to be co-opted by terror groups.

In response to the DOJ’s letter, U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres’s office issued a carefully worded statement to JNS, emphasizing that the United Nations maintains a “longstanding and clear” position: “UNRWA is a subsidiary body of the General Assembly and, as such, is entitled to immunity from legal process under the 1946 Convention on the Privileges and Immunities of the United Nations.”

A spokesperson for UNRWA echoed the same position, reiterating the agency’s intent to assert its immunity through legal counsel and review the DOJ’s position before considering next steps. “We will consider whether any other action is appropriate with respect to the letter,” the U.N. Secretary-General’s office told JNS.

This legal ruling, as the JNS report aptly noted, marks an unprecedented moment of accountability for a U.N. body long mired in controversy, yet largely shielded from judicial scrutiny. For decades, critics of UNRWA—including Israeli officials, Western lawmakers, and watchdog organizations—have accused it of perpetuating the refugee crisis, indoctrinating youth, and acting as a channel for terror financing. Now, for the first time, the veil of immunity may be lifted, and UNRWA may finally have to answer for its alleged role in the bloodshed of October 7.

Whether the court ultimately finds UNRWA guilty remains to be seen. But as the JNS report highlighted, the very fact that the agency must now stand trial could represent a seismic shift in how international organizations are held accountable for crimes committed under the cloak of humanitarian work.

Holocaust Remembrance Day Marked by the Passing of Two Remarkable Survivors, Nechama Grossman and Eve Kugler

Nechama Grossman

By: Fern Sidman

As Israel paused to remember the six million Jews murdered in the Holocaust, the nation mourned the loss of two extraordinary survivors whose lives were living testaments to resilience, remembrance, and the indomitable spirit of survival. According to a report at The Times of Israel, Israel’s oldest known Holocaust survivor, Nechama Grossman, passed away on Thursday at the age of 109, and Eve Kugler, a tireless Holocaust educator, died the same day in London at the age of 94.

Born in 1915, Nechama Grossman lived through some of the darkest chapters of human history. As The Times of Israel reported, she fled Europe amidst the terror of the Holocaust and eventually found refuge in the southern Israeli city of Arad, where she lived for most of her life. There, she built not just a home, but a legacy—one grounded in survival, continuity, and family.

Her funeral was held on Friday in Arad, a day after the nation stood in silence for Yom HaShoah, Israel’s Holocaust Remembrance Day. Grossman is survived by an expansive family: two children, four grandchildren, eight great-grandchildren, and two great-great-grandchildren, according to Kan broadcaster, as cited by The Times of Israel.

In a poignant moment earlier in the week, her son, Vladimir Schwatz, honored his mother’s legacy during a Holocaust memorial event. “My mother is one of the oldest Holocaust survivors in the world,” he said. “She experienced the worst and she survived. We must all remember her Holocaust story, remember her survival, so that her past never becomes our future.” His words resonated across the country as Israelis reflected on the lessons of history, and the fragile thread connecting past trauma to present memory.

Also passing on Thursday was Eve Kugler, who died in London at age 94. Her story, as detailed by The Times of Israel, began in Germany, where she was born in 1931. As a child, she witnessed the infamous Kristallnacht pogrom of November 1938—an orchestrated Nazi rampage that destroyed thousands of Jewish homes, businesses, and synagogues. She was only seven years old when her world changed forever.

Fleeing persecution, her family managed to escape to France in 1939, and by 1941, Eve had secured passage to the United States, where she and her siblings lived in foster homes in New York. It wasn’t until 1946, after the war had ended, that the rest of her family was able to reunite with her.

Kugler later graduated from the University of Pennsylvania and worked as a photojournalist, a career that allowed her to tell stories through images—a powerful medium for someone whose childhood was defined by loss and displacement, as was noted in The Times of Israel report.  Later in life, she moved to London, where she emerged as a leading voice in Holocaust education.

Her death came just as she was scheduled to participate in the March of the Living, the annual memorial walk from Auschwitz to Birkenau that draws thousands of people from around the world. Though she was unable to attend this year’s march, she had participated in previous years, including in 2023, using her voice to guide generations in understanding the catastrophic impact of hatred and indifference.

The deaths of Grossman and Kugler call attention to the urgent reality that the generation of Holocaust survivors is rapidly diminishing. Each year, as The Times of Israel has frequently documented, more survivors pass on, taking with them first-hand memories of a genocide that reshaped the course of Jewish and world history.

Their lives serve as sacred bridges between the past and the present—reminders of the pain endured, the lives lost, and the triumph of survival. On Holocaust Remembrance Day, their stories echoed alongside the sirens that wailed across Israel, urging the world not just to remember, but to never forget.

As Grossman’s son so aptly put it: “Remember her survival, so that her past never becomes our future.”

And as the world now bids farewell to two pillars of memory, their voices are not silenced by time, but amplified through testimony, teaching, and the unyielding promise of “never again.”

 

Wisconsin Judge Arrested by FBI for Allegedly Aiding Illegal Immigrant in Evading ICE Custody

 

By: TJVNews.com

In a case that is rapidly garnering national attention, Milwaukee County Circuit Court Judge Hannah Dugan has been arrested and charged with obstruction of an official proceeding after federal authorities allege she actively interfered with an attempt to arrest an undocumented immigrant in her courtroom. According to a report on Fox News, the arrest took place Friday morning following a multi-agency investigation that has stunned Wisconsin’s legal and law enforcement communities.

Fox News reported that the incident in question occurred on April 18, when federal agents from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the FBI, Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) arrived at a Milwaukee courthouse to detain an undocumented male following his scheduled appearance in criminal court.

Citing federal law enforcement sources, the Fox News report stated that Judge Dugan allegedly intervened by instructing the federal agents to redirect themselves to the office of the chief judge—effectively removing them from the courtroom floor. During this maneuver, the undocumented individual was able to swiftly exit the premises, eluding federal custody.

These actions, according to federal investigators cited by Fox News, were not accidental or coincidental. Law enforcement officials believe Judge Dugan willfully obstructed the arrest, using her judicial authority to mislead agents and create an opportunity for the migrant to escape.

Judge Dugan was taken into custody by FBI agents on Friday morning and is expected to make her initial appearance in federal court in Milwaukee later the same day. The Fox News report emphasized that this development marks a rare and serious escalation in the ongoing tensions between local court systems and federal immigration enforcement agencies.

State Rep. Bob Donovan, a Republican legislator and longtime figure in Milwaukee politics, issued a scathing response to the allegations. In a statement shared with Fox News, Donovan said, “In all my years of Milwaukee politics and public safety issues, working with cops, district attorneys, and judges, I have never seen a more irresponsible act by an officer of the court, let alone a judge, if true.” He added that the alleged actions “border on obstruction of justice” and urged that, if the accusations are substantiated, prosecution should proceed to the “fullest extent of the law.”

Judge Dugan, who was elected to Branch 31 of the Milwaukee County Circuit Court in 2016 and reelected unopposed in 2022, is no stranger to public service. She has a long history of working with vulnerable populations, having previously served as executive director of Catholic Charities and with several legal aid organizations. Her docket has largely included misdemeanor cases.

Earlier this week, in response to growing rumors and early local reporting, Judge Dugan attempted to deflect the mounting scrutiny. As the Fox News report noted, the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel reported on her denial of the allegations in an email reply, where she wrote, “Nearly every fact regarding the ‘tips’ in your email is inaccurate.”

However, the credibility of her denial appears to be further eroded by the steady accumulation of investigative findings being reported by Fox News. Efforts by Fox News Digital to reach Judge Dugan for comment were unsuccessful. On Wednesday, a staffer from her office informed Fox that she was in court and would return the call. No further response was received by Thursday.

The courthouse where the incident took place has recently become the site of increased immigration enforcement activity. According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, two individuals have been arrested by ICE officials in courthouse hallways in recent weeks. These developments suggest growing federal interest in conducting apprehensions in what have traditionally been considered sensitive or neutral spaces.

As Fox News noted, questions are being raised about judicial overreach, sanctuary policies, and the friction between state court jurisdictions and federal immigration enforcement. While some defenders of sanctuary ideals may rally to Judge Dugan’s side, the weight of federal charges and the rare nature of a judge being arrested by the FBI may turn this case into a flashpoint for national debate on immigration and the rule of law.

The investigation is ongoing, and Judge Dugan’s appearance in federal court is expected to provide the next chapter in what promises to be a contentious and politically charged legal battle.

Alex Soros: Heir to a Billionaire Empire Faces Scrutiny Amid Questions About Judgment, Leadership, & Political Influence

Alex Soros: Heir to a Billionaire Empire Faces Scrutiny Amid Questions About Judgment, Leadership, & Political Influence

Edited by: TJVNews.com

In a revealing and at times scathing exposé published by New York Magazine, Alex Soros—the 39-year-old son of left-wing billionaire philanthropist George Soros—emerges as an enigmatic and controversial figure at the helm of the powerful Open Society Foundations (OSF). The report, which paints a complex and often unflattering portrait of the younger Soros, was immediately amplified by Fox News, which has extensively covered the political and ideological reach of the Soros family empire.

According to the Fox News report which credited New York Magazine’s profile as raising red flags among current and former OSF insiders, many within the organization have expressed concern that Alex Soros is an ill-suited successor to his father’s philanthropic legacy. George Soros, who built OSF into one of the world’s most influential progressive grant-making institutions since the 1980s, handed over control of the organization to his son in June 2023.

The transition was met with skepticism—even among those close to the family. “The real story is that every single person who knows the family knows that Alex was exactly the wrong person to lead the foundation,” an anonymous source “with deep OSF ties” told New York Magazine, a quote repeatedly cited by Fox News as emblematic of internal discord.

While George Soros became globally known for his financial acumen and support for progressive causes, the New York Magazine piece suggests that Alex Soros lacks both the intellectual discipline and the strategic focus required for the role he now occupies. Fox News reported that he is described as “brooding and cerebral,” yet emotionally volatile, with a speech pattern compared to a “skipping record.” Far from embodying the steady stewardship expected of an OSF leader, Soros is portrayed as impulsive and distracted.

Some insiders, Fox News noted, likened him to Roman Roy, the self-destructive character from HBO’s Succession, calling him “smart but f**king impossible and not particularly interested in the details.” Others invoke biblical allegory, casting him as the Prodigal Son—embraced by his father despite years of wayward behavior and detachment from the foundation’s inner workings.

The article draws a sharp contrast between Alex and his elder half-brother, Jonathan Soros, a Harvard Law graduate with a record of policy engagement and financial credibility. As the Fox News report highlighted, many believed Jonathan would be the natural heir to the Soros legacy—a belief that makes Alex’s ascension all the more baffling to foundation veterans.

As the Fox News report detailed, Alex Soros has also drawn criticism for his highly visible political lifestyle, frequently posting photographs of himself with high-profile Democrats and global leaders. These include images with President Joe Biden, former President Bill Clinton, Vice President Kamala Harris, Governors Gretchen Whitmer and Josh Shapiro, and even Pope Francis and President Emmanuel Macron.

One particularly telling episode came during the 2024 presidential race when Alex hosted a fundraiser for vice-presidential candidate Tim Walz at his New York apartment and posted photos of the event on social media. According to New York Magazine, the move was viewed internally as a “PR headache.” As one former OSF official put it, Alex seems drawn to “shiny objects,” a trait that the Fox News report argued is symptomatic of superficial engagement rather than meaningful leadership.

Fox News has long scrutinized the political activities of both George and Alex Soros, with recent reporting highlighting a Media Research Center analysis that alleges Alex Soros politicized mass shootings, supported abolishing the Electoral College, advocated for the decriminalization of sex work, and endorsed attacks on conservative Supreme Court justices.

More notably, Fox News reported that since 2018, Alex Soros has funneled over $5 million into federal political campaigns, including a $2 million contribution to the Senate Majority PAC aligned with Senator Chuck Schumer. These donations underscore his growing clout within Democratic fundraising circles, even as questions linger about his policy priorities and strategic vision.

Despite his meteoric rise within OSF, critics inside and outside the organization say Alex Soros has yet to articulate a clear vision for the future. As New York Magazine puts it, he offers no “coherent agenda for the Democrats” and remains unclear about how to challenge what he sees as the rise of authoritarianism in the U.S. Under Alex’s stewardship, the foundation faces a precarious moment, particularly as the Democratic Party struggles with internal fragmentation and a lack of clear messaging heading into the 2024 election cycle.

As the Fox News report indicated, the stakes are immense. With billions of dollars at his disposal, Alex Soros could play a defining role in shaping America’s political and ideological landscape. Yet his critics warn that without a disciplined hand and a well-defined mission, the legacy of Open Society Foundations—and the Soros influence writ large—could face irreparable damage.

Fox News Digital reached out to OSF for comment on the New York Magazine profile but did not receive an immediate response.

 

Faith Meets Fury: Chabad Hassidim Confront Anti-Israel Protesters as Ben-Gvir Speaks in Crown Heights

Faith Meets Fury: Chabad Hassidim Confront Anti-Israel Protesters as Ben-Gvir Speaks in Crown Heights

By: Fern Sidman

Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir delivered a powerful and unapologetic address Thursday night at the iconic Chabad Lubavitch World Headquarters in Crown Heights, Brooklyn, engaging directly with hundreds of Chabad Hassidim amid fierce protests and heightened political scrutiny. The event marked one of the most visible stops of his U.S. tour, according to a report on te Israel National News web site.

Ben-Gvir’s speech, held at the famed 770 Eastern Parkway, home to the spiritual and administrative nerve center of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, centered on the ongoing war in Gaza, Israel’s long-term security challenges, and the implementation of President Donald Trump’s regional vision for peace.

In a resolute and emotionally charged tone, Ben-Gvir declared that Israel must continue to “act with strength and clarity” in Gaza until the terror infrastructure is dismantled. He repeatedly emphasized the legitimacy of Israel’s actions and positioned them within the broader moral imperative of defending Jewish life.

INN reported that following his address, the Minister participated in a “hisvaadus,” a traditional Chassidic farbrengen gathering, where he engaged in informal discussions with Hassidim, offering reflections on Jewish resilience, Torah values, and national security.

Even before Ben-Gvir arrived at the Crown Heights venue, anti-Israel protesters had begun to assemble outside 770, many waving Palestinian flags and chanting slogans including “Free Palestine” and “Zionism is terrorism.” According to Israel National News, tensions escalated quickly as demonstrators confronted Chabad attendees, resulting in verbal clashes and moments of physical shoving.

NYPD officers stationed at the scene worked to separate the groups and ensure the Minister’s arrival and departure went unhindered. No serious injuries were reported, though police later confirmed several citations were issued for disorderly conduct.

Chabad members in attendance described the protest as a deeply disrespectful intrusion on a sacred site, particularly during a spiritual gathering intended to foster unity and support for Israel during wartime, according to the INN report.

Earlier on Thursday, Ben-Gvir held a closed-door policy briefing in Manhattan with Jewish community leaders, students, journalists, and business professionals, during which he discussed his positions on a wide range of topics — including Trump’s Gaza resettlement plan, voluntary emigration of Gazan civilians, and the future of Israeli governance in the region.

During the session, an anti-Israel protester burst into the room, screamed “Ben-Gvir is a Nazi,” and loudly shouted “Free Palestine” before being swiftly escorted out by the Minister’s security team, as was reported by INN.

Ben-Gvir, characteristically unfazed, responded with a smirk, earning applause from supporters in the room. According to Israel National News, this disruption only sharpened the audience’s attention to the Minister’s unapologetically hardline messaging.

In response to a question from a Jewish community member about the status of the Trump administration’s proposed peace plan, Ben-Gvir made his stance unequivocal.

“I hope that Prime Minister Netanyahu will take the path of Trump’s plan,” Ben-Gvir said. “It’s correct, it’s real, it’s moral, and it’s the solution.”

INN reported that he expressed strong support for voluntary emigration policies as part of the long-term solution for Gaza, saying: “I recognize the Prime Minister’s openness regarding the idea of voluntary emigration. I do everything I can for it to happen — not tomorrow, but yesterday.”

Ben-Gvir framed the Trump plan not merely as a geopolitical blueprint but as a moral imperative — one that centers Jewish security and self-determination in a volatile Middle East.

Ben-Gvir’s trip to the United States, which has included visits to Mar-a-Lago, police precincts, Jewish organizations, and synagogues, has drawn criticism from progressive Jewish groups, civil rights advocates, and anti-Zionist organizations. Some have decried his meetings with senior Republicans and public defense of hardline policies, including the bombing of Hamas food storage sites.

Still, as Israel National News has reported consistently, Ben-Gvir remains undeterred, using his American tour to rally Diaspora support, particularly from Orthodox and Zionist communities who view his positions as uncompromising but necessary.

Ben-Gvir’s Brooklyn address — delivered under the spiritual banner of Chabad and amid vocal public backlash — encapsulated the deepening divides both within the American Jewish community and in broader U.S.-Israel discourse.

For his supporters, the Minister’s visit was an act of Jewish pride and solidarity in the face of rising antisemitism and anti-Israel sentiment. For his critics, it was a flashpoint for renewed protest against Israel’s right-wing leadership.

Regardless of where one stands, as the Israel National News report noted, Ben-Gvir’s presence on American soil continues to make headlines — and stir hearts. His message: Israel’s fight is existential, and it will not pause for politeness.

Yale Revokes Status of Anti-Israel Student Group Over “Disturbing Anti-Semitic Conduct”  at Jewish Student Event

shutterstock

Yale Revokes Status of Anti-Israel Student Group Over “Disturbing Anti-Semitic Conduct”  at Jewish Student Event

By: Fern Sidman

In a significant development amid rising tensions on U.S. college campuses, Yale University has revoked the registered status of the student group Yalies4Palestine and opened an investigation into what it described as “disturbing antisemitic conduct” during an unsanctioned protest targeting a Jewish student event earlier this week.

As reported on Thursday by The Jewish News Syndicate (JNS), the decision came swiftly after university officials found that Yalies4Palestine had blatantly violated institutional policies—despite having received explicit warnings only one day prior.

“Yale condemns antisemitism and will hold those who violate our policies accountable through our disciplinary processes,” the Ivy League institution said in a formal statement.

The controversy erupted on Tuesday night when protesters affiliated with Yalies4Palestine and an unregistered anti-Israel group staged a disruptive protest against a private off-campus event hosted by Shabtai, a global Jewish leadership society associated with Yale students and alumni, according to the information provided in the JNS report. The event featured Israeli National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir, a frequent target of pro-Palestinian and far-left criticism.

Video footage shows protesters blocking access to parts of the Yale campus, including forming a human chain that physically obstructed Jewish students attempting to attend the Shabtai event. The JNS report indicated that at least one video posted by a Jewish student captured the moment they were denied passage through Beinecke Plaza, where the encampment and demonstration had taken place.

The federal Task Force to Combat Antisemitism, which includes officials from the Departments of Education, Justice, and Health and Human Services, as well as the General Services Administration, issued a rare public statement on the incident. “We are cautiously encouraged by Yale’s actions,” the task force noted, citing enforcement of time, place, and manner restrictions and the prompt deregistration of the student group responsible. The task force also commended Yale for launching a disciplinary review of individual students who may have crossed the line from speech into harassment or unlawful conduct, the JNS report said.

The protest on Tuesday evening was launched less than 24 hours after Yale administrators held a formal meeting with Yalies4Palestine to discuss prior violations of university policies. During that meeting, the group was explicitly warned that further misconduct would result in disciplinary measures and loss of privileges.

“Because Yalies4Palestine has flagrantly violated the rules to which the Yale College dean’s office holds all registered student organizations,” Yale stated, “the college is withdrawing its status as a registered student organization.”

As a result, the group has been removed from Yale’s official database of student clubs. As per the JNS report, the decision strips the organization of its ability to reserve campus space, apply for university funding, use Yale branding, or participate in institutional programming.

Yale officials also announced that individual disciplinary measures would be taken against students involved in the protest, particularly those who had already received prior warnings or sanctions. Penalties may include reprimand, probation, suspension, or even expulsion, with law enforcement potentially involved in more severe cases.

In a parallel development, Harmeet Dhillon, Assistant U.S. Attorney General for Civil Rights, posted on social media that the Justice Department is monitoring the situation and has already engaged with affected students.

“The DOJ is tracking the concerning activities at Yale and is in touch with impacted Jewish students,” Dhillon wrote, according to the JNS report.

Some anti-Israel groups have alleged that Yale acted out of fear of losing federal funding in light of mounting pressure from the Trump administration, which has taken aggressive action in recent weeks against universities perceived to be failing to combat antisemitism. As JNS reported, several institutions are already facing multi-billion-dollar federal grant freezes for their failure to act on campus hate incidents.

In this context, critics from anti-Israel circles accused Yale of “capitulating” to outside pressure. A joint statement by several protest organizations denounced the university’s decision and claimed that the crackdown on Yalies4Palestine was part of a broader campaign to suppress pro-Palestinian voices on campus.

Yale is far from alone in facing rising tensions surrounding campus protests on Israel-related issues. According to the information contained in the JNS report, a nationwide uptick in antisemitic harassment and campus incitement has led to dozens of federal civil rights investigations under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, or national origin—including antisemitism in federally funded programs.

The federal Task Force to Combat Antisemitism has been a central player in coordinating efforts to hold academic institutions accountable. Their recent praise of Yale’s response signals that universities that swiftly enforce their own codes of conduct may be less likely to face severe federal penalties.

As the JNS report emphasized, the developments at Yale University could serve as a blueprint for other colleges navigating the difficult terrain of protest rights versus institutional responsibility. While universities must preserve freedom of expression, they are equally obligated to protect Jewish students from targeted harassment and ensure campus safety.

By decisively revoking the privileges of Yalies4Palestine and initiating disciplinary proceedings, Yale appears to be taking the threat of antisemitism seriously, even as debates rage over how to define the boundary between protected speech and hate-fueled intimidation.

For Jewish students who have felt increasingly unsafe on elite campuses, Yale’s response may signal a long-overdue turning point. For university leaders nationwide, it is a powerful reminder that failing to act decisively could come with profound institutional and legal consequences.

Nassau University Medical Center Chairman Fired Just Hours After Burglary at His Home Linked to Federal Corruption Probe

Nassau University Medical Center Chairman Fired Just Hours After Burglary at His Home Linked to Federal Corruption Probe

Edited by: TJVNews.com

In a dramatic and fast-moving political saga, Matthew Bruderman, the embattled chairman of Nassau University Medical Center (NUMC), was abruptly fired late Thursday by Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman — just hours after The New York Post revealed that burglars had broken into Bruderman’s home and stolen sensitive documents tied to a sweeping federal corruption investigation.

According to the information provided in The New York Post report, Bruderman’s removal marks a stunning fall for a man who had once been credited with helping pull NUMC back from financial disaster — and who, until recently, appeared to be working closely with county leaders to expose alleged large-scale corruption.

In a statement provided to The New York Post, Blakeman offered few details about the sudden dismissal, merely thanking Bruderman for his service.

“We thank Matt Bruderman for his service as Chairman of the Board of Nassau University Medical Center. Under his leadership, NUMC was able to reduce its deficits by significant margins and improve its ratings,” Blakeman said.

Bruderman, an unpaid volunteer in his role, was originally slated to serve until 2027. He is now being replaced by Dr. Irina Gelman, Nassau’s Health Commissioner, whom Blakeman praised as a “healthcare professional who’s shown the highest level of professionalism” and someone “uniquely qualified to lead the NUMC board.”

Yet the abrupt timing — coming just four hours after The New York Post’s explosive report about the burglary at Bruderman’s Oyster Bay home — has fueled widespread speculation about deeper political maneuvering behind the scenes.

According to The New York Post report, burglars specifically targeted Bruderman’s home, taking only a single binder containing sensitive records related to a federal corruption investigation. The materials reportedly detailed financial misconduct and mismanagement that Bruderman uncovered during his review of NUMC’s finances — misconduct he claimed involved more than $1 billion siphoned off by former state and county leaders since 2006.

The stolen binder was later recovered by Center Island police, but officials have not disclosed whether any suspects have been apprehended. The police have confirmed that an “active investigation” is ongoing but declined to release further details.

In an exclusive interview with The New York Post, Bruderman expressed shock and outrage over his firing, claiming he is the victim of political retribution.

“I was told if I didn’t resign today, like a coward, I would be removed,” Bruderman said. “I was told [Gov.] Kathy Hochul wanted my head for exposing the corruption and previously supporting Lee Zeldin. I was told I don’t understand how powerful these people are and the lengths they would go to hurt me. I refused to resign and they had no choice but to remove me.”

Governor Kathy Hochul’s office did not immediately respond to The New York Post’s request for comment on the allegations.

Bruderman framed his ouster as a politically motivated retaliation for blowing the whistle on financial improprieties, stating that officials “buckled under pressure” from entrenched power structures once his findings gained traction.

Despite the bitter end to his tenure, Bruderman said he remains immensely proud of his accomplishments at NUMC. Under his leadership, the once-financially bleeding institution turned a remarkable corner. As reported by The New York Post, NUMC is now projected to post a profit of approximately $11 million in 2025 — a dramatic turnaround from nearly $200 million in losses just two years earlier.

The hospital’s public corporation, NuHealth, credited Bruderman’s leadership for spearheading cost-cutting initiatives, operational reforms, and new financial oversight protocols that put the institution back on stable footing.

“I fixed the hospital and exposed corruption and people buckled under the pressure,” Bruderman said defiantly to The New York Post. “I will shift my focus towards protecting the hospital, its staff and patients from afar. I will see that those responsible for corruption are held accountable and I will make sure it is there for generations to come.”

Bruderman’s firing and the mystery surrounding the burglary at his home have sent shockwaves through Nassau County’s political and healthcare communities. While Blakeman and other county officials have remained tight-lipped, insiders cited by The New York Post suggest that the situation has escalated into a broader power struggle, with implications that could reach into the highest levels of state government.

Meanwhile, federal authorities — with FBI Director Kash Patel reportedly briefed during an earlier meeting with Blakeman in Long Island — are continuing to investigate the allegations of financial misconduct that Bruderman raised before his removal.

The case highlights the intensely fraught intersection of healthcare governance, political loyalty, and corruption allegations in one of New York State’s largest suburban counties.

Global Surge in Antisemitic Acts is Highlighted at Many Yom HaShoah Commemorations, Says Watchdog Group

Yom Hashoah. Bushko Oleksandr/Shutterstock.

Global Surge in Antisemitic Acts is Highlighted at Many Yom HaShoah Commemorations, Says Watchdog Group

By: Fern Sidman

As Israel and Jews around the world commemorated Yom HaShoah — Holocaust Remembrance Day — with solemn ceremonies, the Combat Anti-Semitism Movement (CAM) warned that the very hatred that fueled the Nazi genocide of six million Jews is not a relic of the past, but a rising global menace.

According to a new report released this week by CAM’s Antisemitism Research Center (ARC), antisemitic incidents surged worldwide in the days surrounding the commemoration, a deeply troubling juxtaposition that highlights the persistent danger facing Jewish communities around the globe.

In Sweden, the chilling specter of Nazi symbolism returned on April 20th — Adolf Hitler’s birthday — as three massive banners emblazoned with swastikas were draped over a highway just outside Stockholm, in what Swedish officials described as an act of neo-Nazi provocation. CAM noted that this date has historically attracted far-right extremists emboldened to demonstrate their antisemitic ideology.

Meanwhile, in New York City, two men were arrested after targeting visibly Jewish pedestrians in Brooklyn’s Williamsburg neighborhood, using a gel gun to simulate a shooting attack. While no physical injuries were reported, the psychological impact on the local Hasidic community was profound, underscoring the dangerous normalization of intimidation tactics.

In Ukraine, the central city of Kryvyi Rih saw an attacker throw a Molotov cocktail at a synagogue, a stark reminder that even amid wartime conflict, antisemitic targeting persists. In Kathmandu, Nepal, a Norwegian national broke into and vandalized a Chabad House, further confirming CAM’s observation that Jewish institutions, no matter how remote, remain vulnerable.

Perhaps the most disturbing U.S.-based development this week occurred at Yale University, where Jewish students reported being harassed and blocked from campus areas by demonstrators in a newly established anti-Israel encampment. CAM emphasized that these types of protest encampments have increasingly blurred the line between anti-Zionist rhetoric and outright antisemitic aggression.

“This week, as Jewish students attempted to attend an event featuring a speaker from the Israeli Knesset, they were instead met with intimidation on their own campus,” CAM stated in its report.

The most lethal act of violence came at Florida State University, where a student with documented neo-Nazi sympathies and antisemitic imagery on his social media and gaming profiles carried out a mass shooting, killing two and injuring six others. CAM urged authorities to investigate potential ideological motives, warning that the convergence of online radicalization and real-world violence represents one of the most urgent antisemitic threats of our time.

Even cultural events were not immune. At the Coachella Music Festival in California, the Irish hip hop group Kneecap projected obscene anti-Israel slogans above the stage during their performance. CAM categorized this act as not merely political expression but as part of a growing trend of antisemitic imagery and slogans infiltrating entertainment spaces, often under the guise of activism.

According to CAM’s ARC weekly tracking, physical threats, violence, and vandalism constituted 25.2% of all documented antisemitic incidents globally this week, marking a sharp increase from 17.6% the previous week and 14.1% the week before that. These numbers highlight an alarming trajectory, especially around high-profile dates of Jewish remembrance or Israeli national importance.

“The irony is devastating,” said a CAM spokesperson. “As the Jewish world reflects on the darkest chapter of its history, a new wave of hatred erupts in real-time. We are witnessing the continuity of a threat we hoped had been consigned to history.”

The Combat Anti-Semitism Movement reiterated its call for governments, academic institutions, and civil society organizations to take urgent and concrete measures to counter the rising tide of antisemitism.

Universities must develop robust policies to differentiate between political expression and targeted harassment.

Law enforcement should treat antisemitic violence and vandalism as priority hate crimes, with enhanced penalties for ideological motivation.

Online platforms must be held accountable for hosting and amplifying extremist content that inspires real-world violence.

Moreover, CAM emphasized that education remains the most powerful weapon against hate, calling for increased investment in Holocaust education, interfaith dialogue, and community resilience programs.

As the world remembers the victims of the Holocaust, the Combat Anti-Semitism Movement’s findings serve as a sobering reminder: the fight against antisemitism is not merely about preserving memory — it is about ensuring that history does not repeat itself.

“We cannot allow the echo of Nazi hate to grow louder in our own time,” CAM concluded. “Yom HaShoah is not just a day of remembrance — it is a call to vigilance. And that call must be answered with action.”

For ongoing updates, analysis, and the complete ARC report, visit www.combatantisemitism.org.

Trump Targets ActBlue with Executive Order Amid GOP Allegations of Fraud and Foreign Influence

(TJV NEWS) President Donald Trump is preparing to sign an executive order aimed at cracking down on foreign interference in U.S. elections, with a sharp focus on the Democrat-aligned fundraising platform ActBlue, according to a report from Politico on Thursday.

The upcoming presidential memorandum, expected to be unveiled soon, is being framed by Trump as a move to protect election integrity by limiting foreign contributions to political campaigns. Sources familiar with the plan, speaking anonymously due to the sensitivity of the matter, indicated that the order will specifically address ActBlue’s operations. Attorney General Pam Bondi is reportedly playing a key role in shaping the legal mechanisms behind the move, though further details have yet to be made public.

In anticipation of the executive action, ActBlue President and CEO Regina Wallace-Jones sent out a fundraising email to Democratic supporters on Wednesday, warning of the potential move. She wrote, “Nothing will deter or interrupt ActBlue’s mission… This is the next version of ‘the big lie,’” referring to what she views as Trump’s ongoing effort to undermine democratic institutions.

The political storm around ActBlue has been intensifying. A recent joint report by House Judiciary Committee Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio), House Administration Chair Bryan Steil (R-Wis.), and House Oversight Chair James Comer (R-Ky.) accused ActBlue of failing to properly prevent fraud, citing internal dysfunction and weak compliance with federal election laws.

Billionaire Elon Musk also entered the fray last month, alleging that ActBlue had funded protest groups targeting Tesla, despite claims that the protests were grassroots. In response to further revelations, Musk tweeted Thursday, “ActBlue is guilty of widespread criminal identity theft,” after conservative commentator Matt Van Swol discovered donations made in his name without his knowledge.

In August, several state attorneys general announced probes into ActBlue over alleged fraudulent donations, and in 2023, citizen journalists and O’Keefe Media Group investigations claimed to uncover extensive examples of unauthorized political donations, raising further questions about potential money laundering through the platform.

As the executive order looms, Trump’s move is expected to provoke legal and political challenges, but it also brings fresh scrutiny to how online fundraising platforms operate within U.S. elections

Washington State University Instructor Arrested for Allegedly Assaulting Student Over Trump Hat

Washington State University Instructor Arrested for Allegedly Assaulting Student Over Trump Hat

A Washington State University (WSU) PhD student and instructor, Patrick Mahoney, has been arrested and suspended from teaching duties after allegedly assaulting a student for wearing a red “Take America Back” Trump 2024 hat, according to a police report obtained by The Jason Rantz Show on 770 KTTH.

The incident occurred on the Pullman campus, where the victim, engineering student Jay Sani, was allegedly confronted by Mahoney and another WSU employee, Gerald Hoff. Sani told police that Mahoney forcefully grabbed his hat and threw it, after which both Mahoney and Hoff allegedly tackled him to the ground.

The police report states that once Sani was on the ground, Mahoney “grabbed Sani’s head and slammed it into the ground.” Sani, attempting to deescalate the situation, reportedly raised his hands and verbally indicated that he was not fighting back.

When questioned by police, Mahoney admitted to taking the hat and justified his reaction by saying, “You’re fking wearing that hat, you wanted someone to fking look at it, right?” He also referred to Sani as “ol’ boy,” expressing familiarity with him from campus and describing him as a “Right Wing dude.” Mahoney claimed that Sani “body-checked” him, prompting the alleged physical response, which included striking Sani in the jaw.

Both Mahoney and Hoff were arrested for assault, as reported by KTTH. Following the arrests, WSU confirmed to The Daily Evergreen that Mahoney had been suspended and removed from all teaching responsibilities.

The incident was also captured on surveillance footage, shared publicly by Frontlines journalist Jonathan Choe on social media, which allegedly shows Mahoney and Hoff initiating the physical altercation.

Mahoney, who is described in reports as a far-left activist, has a history of political involvement, including participation in union activities and advocacy for a ceasefire in Gaza.

In the aftermath, Sani shared his perspective on social media, emphasizing the importance of First Amendment rights. “I’m an engineering student that wants to get the degree and move on. So what if I like someone that you don’t like?” Sani wrote on Facebook. “We have the 1st Amendment, and it’s not okay that just because you don’t like that person, I should be attacked for it.”

The case has intensified national conversations about political tolerance and campus safety, especially as tensions remain high during the 2024 election cycle.

Nassau County’s Proposed 15-Foot Police Buffer Zone Sparks Constitutional Concerns

Nassau County NY Police - LCPDFR.com

Nassau County’s Proposed 15-Foot Police Buffer Zone Sparks Constitutional Concerns

Lawmakers in Nassau County, New York, have introduced a controversial bill that would make it a misdemeanor to come within 15 feet of police officers, firefighters, or other emergency responders during an active emergency — a move critics argue could violate constitutional rights, The New York Post reports.

Under the proposed legislation, civilians who cross the 15-foot “buffer zone” could face a $1,000 fine and up to a year in jail. The Republican-backed bill is intended to shield first responders from potential threats, harassment, and interference while they perform their duties, according to the lawmakers behind it.

“It is important that first responders are not obstructed during emergency situations,” said Legislator John Ferretti, one of the bill’s sponsors. “Our frontline heroes should be able to perform lifesaving actions without distractions.”

The proposal has also received bipartisan support. Democrat Legislator Seth Koslow remarked, “Our cops and first responders shouldn’t have to fight crowds while they’re saving lives. This bill gives them the authority to keep chaos out and do their jobs without interference. It’s backed by both parties — because protecting those who protect us shouldn’t be political.”

However, civil liberties advocates are pushing back. Justin Harrison, senior policy counsel at the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), warned that the bill could suppress public oversight of police actions. “Floating buffer zones offer yet another way for police to keep their activities hidden from public scrutiny,” Harrison said. “Laws that make it harder to monitor the police violate the Constitution and foster distrust in law enforcement.”

The NYCLU pointed to similar “buffer zone” laws in states like Louisiana, Arizona, and Indiana that have been struck down by federal courts. Harrison predicted that if Nassau’s version passes, “it will meet the same fate.”

Although New York State law already criminalizes interfering with emergency personnel, this new legislation would go a step further by restricting how close individuals can get — even if they aren’t actively interfering.

Critics say this added distance could be weaponized to target bystanders, journalists, and activists, particularly during high-stress or controversial incidents. Proponents, meanwhile, argue it’s a necessary safety measure to reduce chaos during emergencies and safeguard those on the front lines.

White House Israel-Iran Policy Director Faces Antisemitic ‘Dual Loyalty’ Smears Over Israeli Experience

(TJV NEWS) The White House National Security Council confirmed this week that Merav Ceren has been appointed as its new director for Israel and Iran policy. The move has sparked criticism, with some accusing her of a conflict of interest due to her past work with Israel’s Defense Ministry — a line of attack critics say echoes long-standing antisemitic tropes about dual loyalty.

Ceren, an American citizen and national security expert, has previously served in high-level policy roles in both the Senate and House, including as deputy policy director for the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation. According to her biography on the Foundation for Defense of Democracies (FDD), she participated in negotiations between Israeli and Palestinian officials in the West Bank during a fellowship at Israel’s Ministry of Defense and worked as a researcher at the Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs. She holds a master’s degree in international relations from Syracuse University and is fluent in Hebrew, with proficiency in Arabic and Turkish.

Her appointment drew fire from critics including the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), which claimed that her past experience compromises her impartiality on Middle East policy. “Placing someone who previously worked for the Israeli military in charge of U.S. policy on Iran and Israel undermines American diplomacy and raises serious concerns about impartiality and the potential for war,” CAIR stated — despite the fact that Ceren’s work was limited to civilian policy coordination, not military service.

Responding to the backlash, National Security Council spokesperson Brian Hughes defended Ceren, saying, “She is a patriotic American committed to implementing President Trump’s agenda, and these lies are efforts to undermine that agenda.” Ceren’s defenders across the national security community also pushed back against what they described as baseless and bigoted attacks.

“She has a great reputation for competency and being very good on policy, and I’ve never seen anyone who knows her question her patriotism,” wrote Rebeccah Heinrichs of the Hudson Institute. Jason Brodsky, policy director at United Against Nuclear Iran, called the criticism “disgusting,” emphasizing that Ceren never officially served in the Israeli military and calling the accusations “antisemitism that belongs in the gutter.”

Merav Ceren’s brother, Omri Ceren, is also known in Washington as a foreign policy adviser and legislative director for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who is a vocal supporter of Israel.

Critics note that the attacks on Merav Ceren reflect an enduring antisemitic trope: the accusation that American Jews are inherently disloyal or beholden to Israel. As the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) has documented, Jewish public servants have frequently been subjected to suspicion over supposed dual allegiances. Former President Richard Nixon, for instance, was caught on tape expressing fear of a “Jewish cabal” in his administration, saying he believed Jews were “born spies.”

“These kinds of attacks aren’t just unfair — they’re dangerous,” said one Jewish community leader. “They delegitimize Jewish Americans’ right to serve in government and contribute to foreign policy just like anyone else.”

As noted by JNS, the controversy over Ceren’s appointment underscores the growing politicization of U.S.-Israel policy — and the risks faced by Jewish Americans who step into the spotlight in national security roles.

Notably, a 2005 Los Angeles Times article identified Ceren as being born in Haifa, Israel. However, she left as a toddler and only returned briefly in 2004. Her career has been shaped overwhelmingly by her work in U.S. public service and foreign policy circles.

Despite the uproar, White House officials are standing by her qualifications and commitment. As one former colleague put it: “If we start disqualifying people based on their ethnicity or faith, we’re surrendering to the very prejudice we claim to oppose.”

Schumer accuses Trump of ‘weaponizing antisemitism’ to defund universities

Chuck Schumer’s record on Israel is clear: he has repeatedly failed to prioritize the security and well-being of America’s closest ally in the Middle East. Credit: AP

By Vered Weiss, World Israel News

Senator Minority Leader Chuck Schumer accused President Donald Trump of “weaponizing antisemitism” in his decision to cut federal funding to certain universities for failing to protect Jewish students.

Schumer, the highest-ranking Jewish politician in the US, posted on social media on Holocaust Remembrance Day, “Stop disgracefully weaponizing antisemitism to attack universities.”

Schumer joined other Jewish Democratic senators in urging the Trump administration to abandon its current policy. His statement followed a letter addressed directly written to the president by Schumer and four fellow Democrats—Senators Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Jacky Rosen of Nevada, Adam Schiff of California and Brian Schatz of Hawaii.

 

 

“[Trump’s] failing to address the real problem of antisemitism—instead using this crisis as a pretext to attack those who disagree,” they wrote.

The senators wrote that they were disturbed by Trump’s “broad and extralegal attacks against universities and higher education institutions as well as members of their communities.”

The letter added that Trump’s actions “seem to go far beyond combating antisemitism, using what is a real crisis as a pretext to attack people and institutions who do not agree with you.”

  What Columbia University president Katrina Armstrong really told faculty members

Recommended for you

How To Stay Down And Compress The Golf Ball (Without Being Wide Open)Sponsored | Performance Golf
Your Email Should Be Private. Proton Mail Is Free and Built for Your SecuritySponsored | Proton Mail
This game is so realistic that it’s worth playing just to see!Sponsored | RAID: Shadow Legends

The senators claimed that Trump was “undermining or even destroying these vital institutions while hiding behind claims of tackling antisemitism as a guise” and requested that the president answer certain questions posed in the letter by April 30.

The missive follows Harvard University’s announcement that it would sue the Trump Administration for its decision to cancel $2 billion in funding.

At a campaign rally last August in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, Trump accused the Democrats of siding with Hamas and anti-Israel factions on the far-left in the U.S., labeling Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer a “proud member” of the terrorist group.

Mayor of major US city blasted by Jews for wearing pro-Hamas symbol

Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson (right), April 25, 2025 (X screenshot

(JNS) The Chicago Jewish Alliance denounced Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson on Wednesday after the local chapter of the Council on American–Islamic Relations posted a photo of him wearing a keffiyeh to celebrate Arab Heritage Month.

“This is outrageous,” the alliance wrote. “For the mayor of Chicago to stand there—cloaked in a symbol now synonymous with Jewish bloodshed, flanked by an organization that justifies it—is more than tone-deaf. It’s a betrayal.”

“It tells Jewish Chicagoans: Your pain doesn’t matter. Your dead don’t count. Your safety is negotiable,” it continued, adding that the garment is “not neutral. It’s a flag of war.”

 

 

“The keffiyeh isn’t just a cultural symbol. Not anymore. In today’s world, it’s worn at Hamas rallies. It’s paraded in the streets when mobs chant ‘From the river to the sea,’ a call for the eradication of Israel. It’s the uniform of those who cheered on the Oct. 7 massacre — where babies were burned, women raped, and over 1,200 Jews slaughtered.”

The statement went further to call out CAIR, stating the organization is a “co-conspirator in the largest terror-financing trial in U.S. history.”

CAIR blamed Israel for the Hamas-led terror attacks in southern Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, and was removed from the White House national strategy on antisemitism under the Biden administration. Its executive director, Nihad Awad, said that Israel does not have the right to self-defense.

While the alliance condemned the action, the organization added that Arab Heritage Month “should be celebrated” but “through food, music, poetry, and history,” and “not by embracing symbols of terror.”

Lisa Katz, chief government affairs officer for the Combat Antisemitism Movement, encouraged Johnson “to engage in open dialogue with Chicago’s Jewish community, learn more about the evolving symbols of modern-day antisemitism, and show solidarity against antisemitism and hate in all their contemporary forms.”

“This moment presents an opportunity for education, for empathy and for leadership that brings communities together rather than deepening divides,” Katz wrote.

Trump Touts Abraham Accords, Predicts More Normalization Deals With Israel: “Maybe” I Deserve the Nobel Peace Prize

R-L: UAE Foreign Minister Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan, President Donald Trump, PM Benjamin Netanyahu and Bahrain Foreign Minister Dr. Abdullatif bin Rashid Al-Zayani sign the Abraham Accords, Sept. 15, 2020. (White House/Joyce N. Boghosian)

Trump Touts Abraham Accords, Predicts More Normalization Deals With Israel: “Maybe” I Deserve the Nobel Peace Prize

By: Fern Sidman

During a high-profile Oval Office meeting with Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre on Thursday, President Donald Trump reignited the debate over his candidacy for the Nobel Peace Prize, suggesting that his administration’s Abraham Accords might be deserving of the world’s most prestigious peace honor.

“Maybe for the Abraham Accords,” Trump said with a confident grin in response to a reporter’s question about whether he felt worthy of the prize, The Times of Israel reported on Thursday.

The meeting with the Norwegian leader, whose country administers the Nobel Prize, offered a symbolic backdrop for Trump to reflect on the foreign policy legacy of his first term and hint at what may come next.

While the Nobel Committee does not publicly comment on nominees, Trump was formally nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize in 2020 and 2021 by several European lawmakers specifically for his role in the Abraham Accords, as was noted in The Times of Israel report.

Though he ultimately did not win, Trump and his supporters have long argued that his administration’s success in achieving Arab-Israeli normalization — without territorial concessions or war — constitutes a landmark achievement worthy of the prize.

Trump didn’t just rest on past achievements — he predicted a surge in countries seeking normalization with Israel, crediting continued U.S. diplomatic efforts under his renewed leadership.

“We are going to be filling it up very rapidly,” Trump said, referring to the Abraham Accords, according to The Times of Israel. “A lot of countries want to come into the Abraham Accords.”

The Abraham Accords, a series of U.S.-brokered agreements established in 2020 between Israel and several Arab states — including the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco, and Sudan — marked one of the most significant geopolitical shifts in the Middle East in decades. The accords normalized diplomatic relations and opened avenues for trade, security cooperation, and cultural exchange.

The Times of Israel reported that while critics initially doubted the durability of the agreements, subsequent developments and enduring bilateral ties between Israel and these nations have cemented the Abraham Accords as a cornerstone of Trump’s foreign policy legacy, particularly among pro-Israel voters and international relations experts.

Trump also addressed the high-stakes nuclear negotiations with Iran, suggesting that a new deal may be within reach — while also hinting that military action remains on the table if diplomacy fails.

“There are only two options. One option is not a good option at all,” Trump said, referencing a potential military strike if Tehran pursues a nuclear weapon, as reported by The Times of Israel.

But Trump tempered his remarks with an unexpected note of optimism, stating: “We’re doing very well on an agreement with Iran… that one is well in its way. We could have a very, very good decision, and a lot of lives will be saved.”

His remarks indicate a dramatic potential shift from in his earlier “maximum pressure” campaign against Iran, which included the U.S. withdrawal from the 2015 Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), The Times of Israel report explained. Instead, Trump now appears open to striking a new deal, provided it curtails Iran’s nuclear ambitions and ensures regional stability.

As reported by The Times of Israel, Trump’s comments come at a pivotal time, both domestically and internationally. In recent months, Trump has intensified U.S. engagement with Gulf nations, bolstered military cooperation with Israel, and launched a comprehensive review of U.S. foreign aid tied to antisemitism and extremism abroad. His administration has also linked foreign student visas and federal grants to compliance with anti-terror standards, especially in institutions suspected of harboring anti-Israel sentiment.

In that context, Trump’s Oval Office meeting was as much about diplomatic optics as it was about policy. His references to the Abraham Accords were clearly designed to call attention to his legacy and project future ambitions, not just with Iran but across the wider Arab and Muslim world.

While Trump was characteristically nonchalant when asked if he deserved the Nobel Peace Prize — replying simply “maybe” — The Times of Israel report suggested that the underlying message was more profound: Trump believes the Abraham Accords are far from over.

If additional countries — such as Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, or Oman — were to join the agreements under Trump’s leadership, his claim to the Peace Prize would only grow stronger.

Whether or not the Nobel Committee agrees, Trump’s renewed push for Middle East normalization, combined with his potentially game-changing nuclear negotiations with Iran, ensures that foreign policy will remain a central pillar of his second-term agenda — and a defining element of his presidential legacy.