20.6 F
New York

tjvnews.com

Tuesday, January 27, 2026
CLASSIFIED ADS
LEGAL NOTICE
DONATE
SUBSCRIBE

Zohran Mamdani’s Controversial “Not on Our Dime” Bill Sparks Backlash Over Targeting of Jewish Charities

Related Articles

Must read

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

 

By: Fern Sidman

In a move that has generated fierce debate across political, religious, and legal spheres, New York City mayoral primary winner Zohran Mamdani has reintroduced a legislative proposal that critics say directly targets Jewish charities and religious institutions. The bill—titled “Not on Our Dime!: Ending New York Funding of Israeli Settler Violence Act”—seeks to impose sweeping financial penalties on any New York-based not-for-profit corporation, including synagogues, that provides funds to organizations operating in or associated with Israel’s presence in Judea and Samaria, Gaza Strip, or East Jerusalem.

As reported on Tuesday in The Jerusalem Post, Mamdani’s proposal would amend New York’s not-for-profit corporation law to prohibit what it terms “unauthorized support of Israeli settlement activity.” The bill defines such activity broadly to include not only direct aid to Israeli civilians residing in “disputed” territories, but also support to organizations alleged to be affiliated with the Israeli armed forces or any actions involving the “appropriation” or “damage” of Palestinian property.

If enacted, the legislation would empower the New York State Attorney General to dissolve any nonprofit found in violation. In addition, individuals—specifically Palestinians who claim to have been harmed by “settler violence” allegedly facilitated by such funding—would be granted standing to file civil suits against these entities. According to the report in The Jerusalem Post, violators would be subject to fines of no less than $1 million.

The bill’s language refers repeatedly to “occupied territory,” defining the term to include all areas of Judea, Samaria, Gaza, and East Jerusalem—terminology and scope that align closely with the most hardline interpretations of international law but diverge sharply from Israel’s own legal and historical claims to those territories.

While the original version of the bill, introduced by Mamdani in May 2023, failed to gain traction due to resistance from legislative leadership, The Jerusalem Post report confirmed that the measure was quietly revised and expanded throughout 2024 and formally reintroduced in February 2025. It is currently pending review by the Committee on Corporations, Authorities, and Commissions.

Among the bill’s explicit targets are several well-known Jewish organizations with long histories of philanthropic work in Israel. Mamdani has named the Central Fund of Israel as a focal point of enforcement. Others named on the bill’s companion website, NotOnOurDime.org, include the One Israel Fund, United Hatzalah, ZAKA, and crowdfunding platforms such as JGives and Israel Gives—all of which, according to the site, have facilitated fundraising for equipment or services tied to Israeli defense or security efforts.

In particular, the website claims the One Israel Fund raised more than $2 million in the final months of 2023 alone, including funds for surveillance drones and thermal cameras allegedly provided to settlers in Judea and Samaria. The group also points to videos where recipients of such aid have been identified as individuals sanctioned by the Biden administration for violent conduct.

The Jerusalem Post report warned that if enacted, it could establish a precedent in which American Jewish institutions are financially penalized or dismantled for supporting causes aligned with Israel’s defense or settlement activities—activities that, while controversial internationally, are often considered lawful and even moral by large segments of the Jewish community and Israeli public.

Critics of the bill argue that it constitutes a direct attack on Jewish religious freedom and philanthropic autonomy. “This legislation seeks to criminalize support for Israel under the guise of nonprofit regulation,” one legal expert told The Jerusalem Post, adding that the bill may violate constitutional protections regarding freedom of religion and association.

Proponents, however, frame the measure as a moral imperative. Mamdani and his allies claim the bill is designed to ensure New York does not indirectly subsidize what they characterize as violence and oppression. “It’s about accountability,” one supporter told The Jerusalem Post. “Tax-deductible status should not be a shield for supporting the violation of human rights.”

But Jewish leaders across New York see the bill as a disturbing escalation in efforts to stigmatize support for Israel, particularly in the wake of rising antisemitism following the October 7th Hamas massacre and the subsequent war in Gaza. “At a time when Jewish communities are feeling increasingly vulnerable, this bill chooses to isolate, accuse, and punish,” wrote one op-ed in The Jerusalem Post.

As the legislation awaits review, the broader question looms: Will New York set a precedent in regulating the political reach of charitable giving—or will it ignite a constitutional battle over the right of Jewish Americans to support Israel as they see fit? For now, the tension continues to build.

4 COMMENTS

  1. I guess you will then have to check every Islam Muslim mosque , store front, charity that sends money to.Hamas Palestinian terrorists who kidnapped and kill US citizens.

    • What you said is true. Nevertheless, Israel does not really have a money problem. It has a policy problem. If Israel execute the right policy, the money becomes almost irrelevant.

  2. This is a very interesting expose of the virulent antisemitism motivating this Democrat communist Muslim terrorist and his Democrat supporters, and the Progressive–Muslim Terrorist “Red-Green alliance”.

    When I find a surprising is TJV’s report that, this has “generated fierce debate across political, religious, and legal spheres”. Who are the “fiercely debating”, “political, religious, and legal” actors? Who are these vicious hateful characters? A “debate” makes it sound like there are two sides. Is TJV admitting that the Democrats and Muslims are fiercely evil?

    Does TJV actually believe New York may
    pass laws “regulating the political reach of charitable giving” or will “ignite a constitutional battle over the right of Jewish Americans to support Israel as they see fit”? If so the country verges on becoming a Muslim terrorist Nazi state.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest article