By: Fern Sidman

A storm of controversy has erupted over President Donald Trump’s recent nomination of 29-year-old attorney Paul Ingrassia to lead the U.S. Office of Special Counsel, after resurfaced social media posts revealed that Ingrassia appeared to dismiss the Hamas-led October 7, 2023, massacre in Israel as a psychological operation intended to distract Americans from domestic issues. As reported on Wednesday by The Algemeiner, Ingrassia’s past remarks—many posted publicly on X (formerly Twitter)—have drawn swift backlash from Jewish advocacy groups and critics across the political spectrum.

On October 8, just one day after Hamas terrorists murdered more than 1,200 civilians in southern Israel and abducted over 250 others in a coordinated and brutal cross-border assault, Ingrassia posted: “This ‘war’ is yet another psyop to distract Americans from celebrating Columbus Day.” He continued, one week later: “I think we could all admit at this stage that Israel/Palestine, much like Ukraine before it, and BLM before that, and covid/vaccine before that, was another psyop. But sadly, people fell for it. And they’ll fall for the next one too.”

As The Algemeiner report emphasized, these remarks are particularly disturbing in light of the unprecedented brutality of the October 7 attack—the deadliest day for Jews since the Holocaust. Survivors, including women and children, were burned alive, tortured, and taken hostage. The atrocities were condemned worldwide, with even historically critical nations acknowledging the exceptional horror of the massacre.

Yet Ingrassia, in his now widely circulated posts, appeared to equate public concern over Hamas terrorism with political theater. He also compared the attack to illegal immigration in the United States, stating: “The amount of energy everyone has put into condemning Hamas… should be the same amount of energy we put into condemning our wide open border, which is a war comparable to the attack on Israel in terms of bloodshed.” According to the information provided in The Algemeiner report, this false equivalence—juxtaposing foreign terrorism with U.S. border policy—has sparked outrage from national security analysts and Jewish leaders alike.

Ingrassia’s nomination would place him at the helm of the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC), a crucial independent agency responsible for enforcing ethics laws, protecting whistleblowers, and upholding federal civil service integrity. If confirmed by the Senate, Ingrassia would wield significant authority to investigate claims of misconduct across the federal workforce, recommend disciplinary action, and report egregious behavior to Congress.

Critics argue that his public record—marked by inflammatory commentary and alliances with controversial figures—renders him unfit for the role. As The Algemeiner report explained, Ingrassia has repeatedly voiced support for Andrew Tate, the social media influencer and accused sex trafficker known for his misogynistic and antisemitic views. Tate has previously posted that he refuses to “listen to women, Mexicans, or Jews” and has accused Jews of orchestrating “mass genetic suicide” through immigration policy. He has also accused Israel of committing “genocide” in Gaza and engaged in Holocaust denialism—claims that align with virulently antisemitic conspiracy theories.

Despite this association, Ingrassia has continued to defend Tate online, further deepening concern among Jewish advocacy organizations. The Algemeiner report noted that Ingrassia’s nomination is not an isolated incident but part of a troubling pattern of personnel choices by the Trump administration involving individuals with ties to white supremacist ideologies and antisemitic rhetoric.

One of the most prominent examples is Kingsley Wilson, who was named Deputy Press Secretary at the Department of Defense and is now slated for promotion to serve as Pentagon Press Secretary. Wilson, formerly affiliated with the Center for Renewing America, came under fire for her past social media posts that parroted neo-Nazi talking points—including falsely stating in 2023 that Leo Frank, a Jewish man lynched in 1915 after a widely acknowledged wrongful conviction, had “raped & murdered a 13-year-old girl.” As the report in The Algemeiner highlighted, this narrative has long been used by antisemitic groups to undermine the historical basis for the Anti-Defamation League’s founding.

The elevation of both Wilson and Ingrassia to high-ranking positions has intensified scrutiny of the Trump administration’s vetting process and raised fears among civil rights organizations that antisemitic conspiracies are not only being tolerated but elevated within the corridors of government.

Jewish leaders and watchdogs have urged the Senate to block Ingrassia’s nomination, citing not only his dismissal of the October 7 attacks but also his broader record of conspiratorial and incendiary commentary. “It is unacceptable for someone who casts doubt on one of the worst terror attacks in Jewish history—and who defends individuals known for their explicit antisemitism—to lead a federal ethics agency,” said one official quoted by The Algemeiner.

As the Senate prepares for confirmation hearings, the stakes are clear. The Office of Special Counsel’s mission is rooted in protecting government employees from retaliation, ensuring political neutrality, and maintaining public trust in civil institutions. Ingrassia’s critics argue that his track record undermines every aspect of that mandate.

For now, the White House has not commented on the resurfaced posts. But the growing controversy is likely to make Ingrassia’s confirmation one of the most contentious in the coming months. As The Algemeiner reported, the broader concern is not just one appointment—but a systemic erosion of safeguards meant to prevent the normalization of hate within the highest levels of American governance.