By: Fern Sidman

A forceful critique of prevailing Middle East narratives emerged this week from one of Britain’s most prominent journalists and commentators, Melanie Phillips, who denounced what she termed “Palestinianism” as a corrosive and dangerous ideology that has infected Western political and cultural discourse.

This is a must listen by @MelanieLatest

An absolute must.pic.twitter.com/YuSQ74WTIF

“Palestinianism is a moral cancer in the West – which has corrupted intellectual elites, fried the collective brain, and destroyed the West’s ability to distinguish truth from lies and the…

— Kosher🎗 (@koshercockney) August 12, 2025

In a statement widely circulated on social media and reported by VIN News, Phillips described “Palestinianism” as “a moral cancer in the West — corrupting intellectual elites, frying the collective brain, and destroying the ability to tell truth from lies — and therefore to defend our way of life.”

Her remarks, delivered with characteristic precision and urgency, were aimed at the wholesale adoption by Western institutions, media, and policymakers of a fabricated historical narrative — one that undermines Israel’s legitimacy while eroding moral clarity in the broader defense of democratic values.

As the VIN News report detailed, Phillips went further in her remarks by outright rejecting the notion of a distinct Palestinian people. She asserted: “The indigenous people of the land are the Jews. The ‘Palestinian people’ do not exist. They’ve admitted it themselves: we invented it to twist the minds of the West.”

Such statements directly challenge a foundational assumption underpinning decades of diplomatic engagement in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Phillips argued that this constructed identity, far from serving as a path to coexistence, has been wielded as a tool to delegitimize the Jewish state and to mobilize international opinion against it.

Her comments echo themes long present in her writing and public commentary — that historical revisionism, particularly regarding the origins and legitimacy of Israel, has been systematically advanced in academic, political, and media arenas, often without rigorous challenge.

VIN News noted that Phillips, who began her career in British mainstream media and wrote for outlets including The Guardian and The Times, has in recent decades become a leading voice in confronting clear cut anti-Israel bias and the erosion of Western civilizational confidence.

Her work has consistently focused on the dangers posed when democratic societies internalize false narratives. She has argued that this process has accelerated over the past half-century, particularly in relation to the Middle East, and that it has left Israel increasingly isolated in diplomatic forums and vulnerable to public misperception.

In her latest comments, as reported by VIN News, Phillips linked the rise of “Palestinianism” to a wider breakdown of intellectual rigor and moral reasoning among Western elites. She claimed that by embracing distortions of history, these elites have effectively surrendered the ability to distinguish between aggressor and victim, truth and propaganda.

Such erosion, she argued, carries implications beyond the Middle East. If Western societies cannot clearly identify and defend fundamental truths, their capacity to confront other forms of ideological extremism and geopolitical threat is also diminished.

Phillips’s remarks were met with strong approval from many pro-Israel commentators and organizations, who see them as a needed counterpoint to decades of one-sided advocacy in international discourse. Supporters have praised her for articulating uncomfortable truths at a time when public debate on Israel is often shaped by social media activism and highly selective coverage of events.

Critics, however, are likely to view her statements as provocative and deeply contentious, particularly given the entrenchment of the Palestinian national identity in diplomatic, cultural, and humanitarian frameworks worldwide.

The debate over historical claims to the land has been central to the conflict for more than a century. As VIN News highlighted in its coverage, Phillips’s assertion that the “Palestinian people” is an invented concept aligns with historical research by certain scholars who argue that the term “Palestinian” in its modern political sense only gained prominence in the mid-20th century, following the establishment of Israel in 1948.

Phillips contends that before this period, inhabitants of the territory identified primarily by local, tribal, or religious affiliations, and that the elevation of a distinct Palestinian national identity was a strategic maneuver designed to oppose Jewish sovereignty.

One of Phillips’s central points is her contention that Western academia and media have been instrumental in perpetuating these narratives. She has accused universities of embedding anti-Israel perspectives into Middle Eastern studies programs and has argued that mainstream outlets frequently adopt language and framing that subtly — or overtly — reinforces these perspectives.

She believes such portrayals, repeated over decades, have not only shaped public perception but also influenced policy decisions in Western capitals, making it more difficult for Israel’s security concerns to be understood or addressed fairly.

According to the report at VIN News, Phillips’s remarks come at a time of heightened tension in international diplomacy over the Middle East. The acceptance or rejection of certain historical narratives, she suggested, has a direct bearing on how governments approach peace negotiations, foreign aid, and security cooperation.

If Palestinianism continues to dominate, Phillips warned, Western governments may find themselves supporting policies that inadvertently embolden groups opposed to Israel’s existence — thereby undermining both regional stability and their own moral standing.

Melanie Phillips’s comments represent not a new stance but an intensification of long-held views. By describing “Palestinianism” as a “moral cancer,” she sought to convey the depth of what she perceives as the danger — not only to Israel’s legitimacy, but to the moral and intellectual foundations of Western society itself.

Her remarks will undoubtedly spark renewed debate over the intersection of history, identity, and geopolitics in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. They also highlight the ongoing challenge for policymakers, journalists, and educators in discerning historical fact from political invention — and in navigating a discourse where those lines are often deliberately blurred.

For Phillips and those who agree with her, confronting these distortions head-on remains essential. As VIN News reported, her call is ultimately for a reaffirmation of historical truth as the basis for any genuine peace and for the defense of democratic values against the corrosive influence that Palestinianism exerts.