48.4 F
New York
Saturday, November 16, 2024

Feud Erupts Between Trump Allies Laura Loomer and Marjorie Taylor Greene: A MAGA Divide Grows

Related Articles

-Advertisement-

Must read

Edited by: TJVNews.com

In a striking public spat, two of Donald Trump’s most vocal supporters, Laura Loomer and Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.), have turned from allies to adversaries, engaging in a fierce battle of words. According to a report in The Post, the feud, taking place largely on social media, signals deeper tensions within Trump’s political base as he prepares for the 2024 presidential race. At the center of the controversy is Loomer’s growing presence in Trump’s inner circle and her alleged influence over his debate strategy, which has drawn sharp criticism from Greene.

Laura Loomer, a far-right activist known for her incendiary rhetoric, has become a regular figure in Trump’s orbit, attending events and reportedly offering him advice during key moments of his campaign. This newfound proximity to the former president has not gone unnoticed, with some of Trump’s other supporters questioning her influence. As per the information provided in The Post report, Loomer was even spotted on a private plane with Trump en route to Philadelphia for a televised debate with Vice President Kamala Harris, where she reportedly urged him to take an aggressive, combative stance against his opponents.

While Loomer’s enthusiasm for Trump is well-documented, her growing role as a potential adviser has triggered friction, especially with Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has long been a staunch Trump ally. The rift between the two firebrand conservatives erupted publicly this week, with Greene taking aim at Loomer’s political judgment. The Post noted that in comments to reporters on Thursday, Greene dismissed Loomer’s involvement in Trump’s campaign, saying bluntly, “I don’t think she has the right mentality to advise a very important presidential election.”

The barbs didn’t end there. Both Greene and Loomer have exchanged increasingly pointed remarks on social media, intensifying what has become a public showdown between two of Trump’s most vocal supporters. The report in The Post suggested that their feud has sparked widespread interest within the MAGA movement, with many wondering what impact this conflict could have on Trump’s 2024 prospects.

The conflict between Loomer and Greene erupted after Loomer posted an inflammatory tweet on September 8, 2023, mocking Vice President Kamala Harris in terms that many found overtly racist. The Post report explained that Loomer wrote that if Harris were to defeat Trump in the 2024 election, “the White House will smell like curry,” adding that White House speeches would be conducted “via a call center” and that feedback from the American public would be given through a customer satisfaction survey “that nobody will understand.” Loomer’s comments were seen by many as a blatant insult to Harris’ Indian heritage, drawing widespread condemnation for their racial undertones.

While Loomer has built her brand on provocative, often incendiary, social media posts, her comments about Harris crossed a line for Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has herself faced accusations of racism in the past. Indicated in The Post report was that just three days later, Greene publicly rebuked Loomer, taking to X (formerly Twitter) to call the post “appalling” and insisting that it did not reflect the values of the Republican Party or the MAGA movement. “This does not represent President Trump. This type of behavior should not be tolerated ever,” Greene wrote, demanding that Loomer take down the post.

Greene’s sharp condemnation of Loomer marked a turning point in what has now become a full-blown feud between two of Trump’s most prominent supporters. The Post confirmed that in her response, Greene sought to distance both the Republican Party and Trump from Loomer’s divisive rhetoric, signaling that even in a movement built on populist, anti-establishment rhetoric, there are limits to what should be considered acceptable discourse.

By calling out Loomer so publicly, Greene not only positioned herself as a defender of Republican values but also took a strong stance against the more fringe elements within the MAGA movement. “It does not represent who we are as Republicans or MAGA,” Greene declared when speaking with The Post, as she clearly framed Loomer’s comments as outside the bounds of acceptable political expression

This public denunciation is significant given Greene’s own controversial track record. The Georgia congresswoman has been labeled a “racist” for her past remarks, including her promotion of conspiracy theories, but in this instance, Greene appeared determined to demonstrate a degree of moral leadership by disavowing Loomer’s remarks. The demand that Loomer delete her tweet—an unusually direct rebuke from within the same political camp—also emphasized Greene’s efforts to draw a line between what she views as legitimate political discourse and harmful, racially insensitive rhetoric.

In typical fashion, Laura Loomer did not back down. Rather than deleting the post or apologizing, she doubled down on her attacks, launching a series of provocative tweets aimed at Greene. The report added that Loomer dismissed Greene’s criticisms, sarcastically calling her a “raging anti-Semite” and reviving a well-known controversy in which Greene had promoted a conspiracy theory about Jewish space lasers causing California wildfires. Loomer’s attempt to paint Greene as an anti-Semite is notable given Loomer’s own Jewish heritage, suggesting that she was leveraging this identity to defend herself from Greene’s attacks while simultaneously seeking to discredit the congresswoman.

But Loomer did not stop there. She took the feud to a more personal level by attacking Greene’s recent divorce, accusing her of being a cheater and failing in her own family life. “You couldn’t even run your own family,” Loomer tweeted. “Don’t tell me how to run my FREE SPEECH!” This scathing remark underscored the depth of animosity between the two, with Loomer framing her offensive comments about Harris as a matter of free speech rather than racism.

Loomer’s decision to defend her tweet as a “funny joke” also highlights the ongoing debate within the far-right about the boundaries of humor and free expression. Suggested in The Post report was that while Loomer has built her following by pushing the limits of political correctness and censorship, her response to Greene suggests that she sees herself as a champion of unfettered speech—regardless of its potential to offend or alienate.

Much of the feud centers around Loomer’s role in shaping Trump’s approach during his recent debate with Vice President Harris. According to reports from Axios, Loomer urged Trump to adopt a confrontational tone, pushing him to engage more aggressively with Harris. The information contained in The Post report indicated that Trump’s more seasoned advisers reportedly counseled him to focus on policy issues such as the economy and avoid personal jabs, Loomer is said to have been “egging him on” to challenge Harris directly, despite the risks of derailing the conversation.

By calling out Loomer so publicly, Greene not only positioned herself as a defender of Republican values but also took a strong stance against the more fringe elements within the MAGA movement. “It does not represent who we are as Republicans or MAGA,” Greene declared when speaking with The Post, as she clearly framed Loomer’s comments as outside the bounds of acceptable political expression.

This public denunciation is significant given Greene’s own controversial track record. The Georgia congresswoman has been labeled a “racist” for her past remarks, including her promotion of conspiracy theories, but in this instance, Greene appeared determined to demonstrate a degree of moral leadership by disavowing Loomer’s remarks. The demand that Loomer delete her tweet—an unusually direct rebuke from within the same political camp—also emphasized Greene’s efforts to draw a line between what she views as legitimate political discourse and harmful, racially insensitive rhetoric.

During the debate, Trump appeared to follow Loomer’s advice, deviating from scripted policy points and responding defensively when Harris questioned the enthusiasm at his rallies. When Harris pointed out that rally attendees often leave early due to “exhaustion and boredom,” The Post reported that Trump fired back, saying, “People don’t leave my rallies, we have the biggest rallies, the most incredible rallies,” before pivoting away from the topic of border policy, which was the focus of the question.

This moment, in which Trump allowed himself to be drawn into a personal back-and-forth, contrasted sharply with the disciplined approach his more traditional advisers had recommended. Critics, including Greene, were quick to point out that this was emblematic of the influence Loomer may be exerting on Trump—and not in a good way.

The fallout from Trump’s debate performance only deepened the divide between Loomer and Greene. Taking to social media platform X (formerly Twitter), Greene publicly criticized Loomer, accusing her of promoting damaging rhetoric that could hurt Trump’s chances in 2024. The Post also reported that Greene’s criticisms grew more intense when she responded to a post Loomer had made about Harris, calling it “extremely racist.”

balance of natureDonate

- Advertisement -

1 COMMENT

  1. GOP, this NOT the time for in-fighting! Put aside any personal disagreements and unite. The goal is to get Pres Trump back in the WH! That MUST be your agenda! If Harris is elected, our Constitutional Republic WILL END!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest article

- Advertisement -