Nassau County’s Proposed 15-Foot Police Buffer Zone Sparks Constitutional Concerns

Lawmakers in Nassau County, New York, have introduced a controversial bill that would make it a misdemeanor to come within 15 feet of police officers, firefighters, or other emergency responders during an active emergency — a move critics argue could violate constitutional rights, The New York Post reports.

Under the proposed legislation, civilians who cross the 15-foot “buffer zone” could face a $1,000 fine and up to a year in jail. The Republican-backed bill is intended to shield first responders from potential threats, harassment, and interference while they perform their duties, according to the lawmakers behind it.

“It is important that first responders are not obstructed during emergency situations,” said Legislator John Ferretti, one of the bill’s sponsors. “Our frontline heroes should be able to perform lifesaving actions without distractions.”

The proposal has also received bipartisan support. Democrat Legislator Seth Koslow remarked, “Our cops and first responders shouldn’t have to fight crowds while they’re saving lives. This bill gives them the authority to keep chaos out and do their jobs without interference. It’s backed by both parties — because protecting those who protect us shouldn’t be political.”

However, civil liberties advocates are pushing back. Justin Harrison, senior policy counsel at the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU), warned that the bill could suppress public oversight of police actions. “Floating buffer zones offer yet another way for police to keep their activities hidden from public scrutiny,” Harrison said. “Laws that make it harder to monitor the police violate the Constitution and foster distrust in law enforcement.”

The NYCLU pointed to similar “buffer zone” laws in states like Louisiana, Arizona, and Indiana that have been struck down by federal courts. Harrison predicted that if Nassau’s version passes, “it will meet the same fate.”

Although New York State law already criminalizes interfering with emergency personnel, this new legislation would go a step further by restricting how close individuals can get — even if they aren’t actively interfering.

Critics say this added distance could be weaponized to target bystanders, journalists, and activists, particularly during high-stress or controversial incidents. Proponents, meanwhile, argue it’s a necessary safety measure to reduce chaos during emergencies and safeguard those on the front lines.