Letters to the Editor

Trump’s Plan for Gaza: A Bold Step Toward Peace

Dear Editor,

President Donald Trump’s plan to relocate Palestinians from Gaza in order to rebuild the war-torn region is not just a bold move—it is a necessary step toward lasting peace and stability. For too long, the people of Gaza have been held hostage by Hamas, an Iranian-backed terrorist organization that prioritizes Israel’s destruction over the well-being of its own people. The only viable path forward is to remove Hamas entirely from the equation and create the conditions for a genuine peace—one that ensures Israel’s security while offering Palestinians a real chance for a future free from the grip of terrorism.

The central truth that critics of Trump’s plan refuse to acknowledge is that Gaza, in its current state, is unsustainable. The region has been turned into a launching pad for endless wars against Israel. Hamas has systematically misused humanitarian aid, diverting resources to build terror tunnels and manufacture rockets instead of schools, hospitals, and infrastructure. Rather than allowing this cycle of violence to continue, Trump’s proposal recognizes that a strategic relocation of Palestinians—at least temporarily—would allow for the complete dismantling of Hamas’s terror network while laying the foundation for meaningful reconstruction efforts.

Far from being an act of displacement, this plan is a humanitarian necessity. The Palestinian people in Gaza have endured the brunt of Hamas’s tyranny, forced to live under an oppressive regime that uses them as human shields and cannon fodder in its war against Israel. By relocating them to safer areas—whether in Sinai or Jordan—Trump’s plan would finally give innocent civilians the opportunity to live outside of a war zone while allowing for the complete eradication of Hamas’s military infrastructure. A Gaza free of Hamas is the only way to ensure that billions of dollars in international aid actually go toward improving Palestinian lives rather than funding terror.

Critics claim that neighboring Arab countries, particularly Egypt, should not be expected to accept Palestinians, but this argument rings hollow. Historically, the Arab world has championed the Palestinian cause—so why, in this moment of dire need, should these same nations refuse to provide a safe haven, even temporarily? The truth is that many Arab states have long used the Palestinians as pawns in their political games against Israel. Trump’s plan calls their bluff, putting them in a position to prove whether they genuinely care about the well-being of the Palestinian people or simply seek to perpetuate their suffering as a means to attack Israel.

For Israel, the benefits of this plan are undeniable. For too long, Israel has been forced into military conflicts simply to protect its own citizens from relentless rocket attacks and terrorist incursions. The elimination of Hamas would remove this existential threat, allowing Israel to shift from defense to diplomacy, from constant conflict to long-term peacebuilding. A demilitarized and rebuilt Gaza, free of radicalism, would create an entirely new paradigm for Israeli-Palestinian relations.

Sincerely,
Gabriel Wossowsky
Scarsdale, NY

Universities as Hotbeds of Anti-Semitism

Dear Editor,

The rising tide of virulent anti-Semitism in America—especially on our nation’s college campuses—is a crisis that can no longer be ignored. What once were institutions of higher learning, dedicated to the free exchange of ideas, have morphed into ideological battlegrounds where Jewish students are harassed, silenced, and even physically threatened. Universities that pride themselves on diversity and inclusion have, in reality, become breeding grounds for anti-Israel propaganda and raw, unfiltered Jew-hatred.

In this environment, President Donald Trump’s recent executive order denying visas to foreign students who come to the United States to incite hatred against Jews and call for the destruction of Israel is not only justified—it is long overdue. America must take a firm stand against those who exploit our democratic freedoms to spread genocidal ideologies.

The evidence of this troubling escalation is everywhere. Anti-Semitic incidents on college campuses have skyrocketed, with Jewish students being shouted down, doxed, and physically attacked simply for expressing support for Israel. Student organizations such as Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP) and other radical groups, many of which are backed by foreign interests, routinely glorify Hamas, an Iranian-funded terrorist organization responsible for the massacre of innocent civilians. These groups promote falsehoods that delegitimize Israel’s very right to exist, accusing it of genocide while openly advocating for the eradication of the Jewish state.

Administrators and faculty members, either out of ideological sympathy or sheer cowardice, have largely abdicated their responsibility to protect Jewish students. Under the guise of “academic freedom,” professors openly spew anti-Israel rhetoric, inviting guest speakers who compare Israel to Nazi Germany and justifying terrorist attacks against Israeli civilians. Meanwhile, Jewish students are forced to hide their identities, afraid to wear a Star of David or express support for the only Jewish state in the world.

President Trump’s executive order sends an unmistakable message: America will not be a safe haven for those who seek to import their bigotry onto our campuses.

Sincerely
Talia Waxbaum
Highland Park, NJ

An End to the Russia-Ukraine War?

Dear Editor,

The war between Russia and Ukraine has dragged on for far too long, inflicting immense suffering on civilians, depleting global resources, and destabilizing international security. What began as a conflict over territorial ambitions has evolved into a full-scale geopolitical crisis, with no clear resolution in sight. Ukraine, valiantly defending its sovereignty, continues to rely on Western aid, while Russia remains undeterred, leveraging its military strength and strategic alliances to sustain its war efforts. Amid this prolonged conflict, one pressing question emerges: Can President Donald Trump succeed in negotiating an end to this war where others have failed?

Unlike President Biden’s approach—which has consisted primarily of sending billions in military aid to Ukraine without a concrete diplomatic strategy—Trump has signaled that he intends to pursue direct negotiations with both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. While some critics dismiss Trump’s confidence as mere bravado, history suggests that he may be uniquely positioned to broker a deal that could finally bring peace to the region.

In his previous term as president, Trump’s administration strengthened NATO while simultaneously fostering dialogues with adversaries, including North Korea and Russia. He was the first U.S. president in decades to keep Russia in check without escalating into direct conflict. His tough stance on energy independence also weakened Russia’s economic leverage—something that Biden’s policies have reversed by allowing Moscow to continue profiting from high oil and gas prices.

The world is watching as this conflict continues with no clear resolution. Trump’s unique brand of diplomacy could offer the best hope for ending the war. While critics may doubt his methods, one thing is clear—traditional diplomatic efforts have failed, and a new, bold approach is needed. Whether or not one agrees with Trump’s politics, his ability to bring warring factions to the table cannot be ignored. If anyone can force Putin and Zelensky into an agreement, it just might be him.

Sincerely,
Edward Haimowitz
Rego Park, NY