Letters to the Editor

Trudeau’s Leadership Fell Short

Dear Editor,

The announcement of Justin Trudeau’s resignation has left Canada at a crossroads, prompting reflection on his leadership and its impact on various communities, including the Jewish communities in Montreal and Toronto. While his tenure brought moments of progress and celebration of diversity, it is undeniable that his leadership fell short in addressing a deeply troubling rise in antisemitism—a failure that continues to cast a shadow over his legacy.

The Jewish communities in Montreal and Toronto have long been pillars of Canadian society, contributing richly to the nation’s cultural, economic, and intellectual fabric. However, under Mr. Trudeau’s leadership, they faced an alarming increase in incidents of antisemitism. From hateful graffiti defacing synagogues to students experiencing discrimination on university campuses, the resurgence of age-old prejudices took on a more public and emboldened form. The government’s responses—often characterized by statements of condemnation without substantive follow-through—failed to match the severity of the challenge.

Mr. Trudeau was in a position to make a difference. He could have championed robust legislation against hate crimes, ensured consistent enforcement of existing laws, and worked more effectively with local leaders and organizations to foster a culture of zero tolerance for hate. He could have taken a stronger stance against the pernicious spread of antisemitism in academic institutions and online platforms. Instead, there were too many moments of silence, hesitation, or surface-level gestures that felt more performative than purposeful.

This pattern of inaction was not only a disservice to the Jewish communities of Montreal and Toronto but also to the broader Canadian public. Antisemitism is a canary in the coal mine of societal intolerance—its unchecked growth signals a deeper erosion of the values of inclusivity and mutual respect that Canada holds dear. By failing to address this issue with the urgency and seriousness it demanded, Mr. Trudeau let down the very people he vowed to serve.

Furthermore, his leadership often seemed reactive rather than proactive on many pressing issues. Whether it was economic uncertainty, healthcare reform, or the challenges of uniting an increasingly polarized populace, Canadians often found themselves questioning whether Mr. Trudeau’s government truly understood the everyday struggles they faced. His charisma and eloquence could inspire, but inspiration alone was insufficient when the country needed concrete solutions.

As Canada prepares for a new chapter, it is imperative that the next leader learns from these shortcomings. The Jewish communities—and indeed all communities—deserve leadership that not only condemns hate but actively combats it, creating an environment where every Canadian feels safe, valued, and protected. The fabric of our nation is strongest when woven with the threads of respect and understanding, and it is the responsibility of our leaders to ensure those threads are not frayed by neglect.

Justin Trudeau’s resignation offers an opportunity for reflection, growth, and change. As Canadians, we must demand more from our leaders—not just rhetoric, but action; not just empathy, but accountability. The Jewish communities of Montreal and Toronto, and indeed all of Canada, deserve nothing less.

Sincerely,
Pierre Katzenstein
Montreal, Quebec

Congestion Pricing Means Burden on Commuters

Dear Editor,

The implementation of congestion pricing in New York City is being touted as a bold step towards reducing traffic and funding public transportation. In reality, it feels less like a thoughtful policy solution and more like yet another financial burden on everyday commuters—many of whom already struggle under the crushing cost of living in America’s most expensive city.

For countless workers, small business owners, and families who rely on driving into Manhattan, this new pricing scheme is not merely an inconvenience—it’s an economic barrier. The city claims this policy will reduce gridlock and improve air quality, but let’s be honest: this is primarily about generating revenue. And who will bear the brunt of these costs? Not the wealthy executives in private cars or chauffeured vehicles. It’s the middle-class workers, delivery drivers, tradespeople, and those from the outer boroughs and suburbs who have no practical alternative to driving into Manhattan.

Public transit, while essential, cannot serve every commuter’s needs. Trains are overcrowded, buses are slow and unreliable, and subway stations are in a state of chronic disrepair. Before asking drivers to pay exorbitant tolls just to enter their own city, the MTA should be held accountable for its mismanagement of funds and lack of meaningful improvements. Why should the public be asked to foot yet another bill for an organization that has long been synonymous with inefficiency and financial waste?

Furthermore, congestion pricing risks driving away essential commerce. Small businesses, which are already hanging on by a thread, depend on suppliers, contractors, and customers who travel into the city. Adding yet another expense will undoubtedly lead to increased prices for consumers and potentially force more businesses to close their doors.

New York City has become a place where financial barriers increasingly dictate who gets to live, work, and thrive here. Congestion pricing feels like one more hurdle designed to extract money from those who can least afford it, under the guise of environmental and urban planning concerns. If this were truly about sustainability, we would see a far more aggressive investment in affordable, reliable mass transit and smarter city planning—not simply a toll booth disguised as a traffic solution.

For many commuters, the message from City Hall seems clear: if you can’t afford to pay, you’re not welcome in Manhattan. That’s not the New York spirit we know, and it’s certainly not a vision of a city that claims to value inclusivity and opportunity for all.

Sincerely,
Zachary Lopiansky
Brooklyn, NY

Taking Our Country Back

Dear Editor,

As we approach the inauguration of Donald Trump, there’s a renewed sense of optimism among millions of Americans who believe this moment marks a turning point for our nation. The “America First” agenda represents more than just a slogan—it’s a promise to prioritize the needs of hardworking citizens, secure our borders, revitalize our economy, and restore a sense of pride in our country.

For too long, many Americans have felt ignored by leaders who seemed more focused on global interests than the struggles faced here at home. With Trump back in office, there’s hope that we’ll see policies aimed at strengthening our industries, supporting our workers, and ensuring that America stands strong on the world stage without compromising our sovereignty.

“Taking Our Country Back” isn’t about division—it’s about unity through shared purpose and a commitment to protecting the American dream for future generations. It’s about ensuring that every citizen, regardless of background, feels seen, heard, and respected by their government.

While challenges undoubtedly lie ahead, this inauguration feels like a moment of renewal. I’m hopeful that under Trump’s leadership, we’ll see a return to common-sense policies, bold decision-making, and a vision that puts America—and its people—first.

Sincerely,
Morris Haberman
Asbury Park, NJ