70.1 F
New York
Thursday, September 12, 2024

Study Says Con Edison Charging Double for Gas Delivery, Compared to National Grid

Related Articles

-Advertisement-

Must read

Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Study Says Con Edison Charging Double for Gas Delivery, Compared to National Grid

By:  Serach Nissim

Bronx Rep. Ritchie Torres said that his office has conducted a new study on energy prices, and the results are shocking.  The analysis studied gas bills from multifamily homes this year and last year.  As reported by the NY Post, Torres’ office found higher prices in all the areas served by Con Edison —including the Bronx, Manhattan and part of Queens, citing “hidden overcharges.”  The results of the study revealed that Con Edison charges nearly 100% more for gas delivery to some Big Apple customers compared to its competitor National Grid.  Average delivery costs per thermal unit of gas were $1.29 in the Bronx; in Manhattan it was $1.01 and in the part of Queens served by Con Edison it was 92 cents, as per the study.

By contrast, National Grid charges an average delivery cost of 54 cents per thermal unit, and its Queens customers paid 45 cents, per the study, which did not take Staten Island into account.  “The following report concludes there is nothing remotely just and reasonable about the delivery rates Con Ed  is charging the customers of the Bronx, Manhattan and Queens,” Torres said in a statement.

Torres, 36, has since 2021 represented New York’s 15th congressional district, which includes most of the South Bronx and which is arguably the poorest congressional district in the country.  Torres, a Democrat who previously served as a member of the city council from 2014 to 2020, is now demanding the state’s Public Service Commission to investigate the “inexplicable disparities.”  The commission’s job is to regulates and oversees gas, electric and water industries in NYS.

“When a state-sanctioned monopoly abuses its power to overcharge the public, compounding the crippling cost of inflation, the burden falls on both the Governor and the Public Service Commission to act swiftly to protect the hard-earned dollars of New Yorkers from predatory price-gouging,” Torres told The Post.

Con Ed customers were appalled by the findings.  “I am very unhappy. I didn’t know how bad it was,” said Wardean D. Squire-Askew, a retired construction manager living in the Tremont.  “Every time you turn around ConEd increases the [fees].”

Bronx landlord Ardon Wiener, who helped the Post review the data, said the main problem was inefficiency at Con Ed.  “Con Ed is run significantly less efficiently than National Grid and the consumer picks up those inefficiency costs and therefore the consumer pays a significant premium for an equivalent service, providing gas for heating and cooking,” said Wiener, who donated $6,100 to Torres’ campaign in 2023, per records.

Con Ed commented saying it was providing a superior product and making investments in safety and “clean energy.”  The energy giant did not deny the price discrepancies.  “Energy delivery rates vary from utility to utility for many reasons, including the level of service, customers’ needs, the characteristics of the area and when new rates take effect. As we move from fossil fuels to clean energy, we are investing about $1 billion a year to keep our gas system safe. We replace 80 miles of cast-iron and steel main annually, conduct monthly leak patrols and are installing a first-of-its kind gas detector in customers’ homes and businesses, an enormous step forward for safety. We encourage reforms that reduce natural gas consumption and provide customers with clean energy alternatives.” Con Edison said in a statement.

balance of natureDonate

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Latest article

- Advertisement -