Election 2020

Republican Attorneys General Taking Legal Action over Pennsylvania Mail-in Ballots

KATHERINE RODRIGUEZ

Republican attorneys general from across the U.S. are taking legal action in Pennsylvania to challenge mail-in ballots.

Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, Missouri Attorney General Eric Schmitt, and Oklahoma Attorney General Mike Hunter spoke about the subject during a virtual press conference Monday afternoon.

“We have constantly reminded the American people that we represent and stand up for the rule of law,” Landry, the chairman of the Republican Attorneys General Association, said. “As such, we believe the voting system should be free of outside, undue influence.”

Landry compared President Donald Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden’s presidential race to “referees getting to change the rules midway through the football game.”

“We believe that’s exactly what the Pennsylvania Supreme Court did,” Landry said.

Schmitt, who was instrumental in bringing this brief forward, said the attorneys general filed this brief Monday “seeking the Supreme Court to take the Pennsylvania case and then reverse the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision.”

In the brief, Schmitt said they highlighted the issue of “separation of powers,” specifically to state legislatures “granting time, place, and manner” for their state’s frameworks.

Schmitt said the state Supreme Court “overstepped” its bounds when dealing with the state legislature.

Schmitt also said the brief dealt with “election integrity,” and called mail-in ballots the “most likely form of fraud.”

He then cited a recent case in Missouri where a local official was indicted for ballot fraud.

Hunter called the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s actions “one of the most breathtaking abuses of judicial authority.”

He then explained that the group as attorneys general had a responsibility to “address that kind of abuse of judicial authority” because it can affect election outcomes not just in Pennsylvania but nationwide.

“We are seeking the Supreme Court to take this case,” Schmitt said. “We think this is a very, very important case.”

Before the election, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court said it would allow mail-in ballots to be counted post-Election Day without evidence of a postmark. The state Supreme Court also ruled before the election that ballots cannot be tossed over a mismatched signature.

Breitbart

Sholom Schreirber

Progressively maintain extensive infomediaries via extensible niches. Dramatically disseminate standardized metrics after resource-leveling processes. Objectively pursue diverse catalysts for change for interoperable meta-services.

Share
Published by
Sholom Schreirber
Tags: Featured

Recent Posts

Anti-Israel protesters occupy Barnard building, demand ‘amnesty’ for expelled peers

( JNS) The Empire State Building was lit orange on Wednesday night in memory of Shiri…

3 hours ago

Four coffins returned to Israel from Gaza, identification ongoing

( JNS) The Israeli Prime Minister’s Office confirmed on Wednesday that four coffins returned from…

3 hours ago

House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Mandates Use of “Judea and Samaria” for Israel’s Biblical Heartland

House Foreign Affairs Committee Chair Mandates Use of “Judea and Samaria” for Israel’s Biblical Heartland…

3 hours ago

Oscar-winning actor Gene Hackman and his wife and dog found dead in their New Mexico home

(AP) — Oscar-winning actor Gene Hackman, his wife and their dog were found dead in their…

3 hours ago

NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch Condemns Bail Reform and Lenient Prosecution as Crime Surges in NYC

NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch Condemns Bail Reform and Lenient Prosecution as Crime Surges in NYC…

3 hours ago

Top CUNY honchos OK’d antisemitic Hunter College course — now heads must roll

Jeffrey Lax (originally published in NY Post) Gov. Hochul was resolute and clear-eyed Tuesday when…

3 hours ago